It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The particular version I was quoting uses the word, slave, while most versions use the word, servant. According to the translators of this version, bond-servant does not mean anything to most readers, so they used a word that implies that they were not free to just quit their job if they felt like it, being under obligation to fulfill their contract.
Why is Jesus talking about slaves anyway?
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by 1MrsJesusChrist
It looks like you are taking issue with what jhill76 wrote.
I was just quoting what he wrote and was asking what the source was for it.
You seem to be quoting the creation story according to Jesus, where he is saying that God has made people in one sort of way from the beginning, which is, male and female. He says it in such a way, to me, where it does not set one before the other.
This is true though maybe not so prevalent in today's Western culture, as it was back in the early to mid eighteen hundreds.
Since the word male is 1st and God made man 1st; most men think they have some pre-eminence over Women. . .
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by 1MrsJesusChrist
She is catering to a specific crowd, of ultra-conservative Bible-thumpers and not really such a good indication of Americans in general.