It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003
This is pure fascism.A so called copyright should not be used to destroy small scale free market capitalists.This is whats happening ,the fascists are destroying the free market capitalists.
not done....
a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.
The copyright infringement of software (often referred to as software piracy) refers to several practices which involve the unauthorized copying of computer software. Copyright infringement is the unauthorized or prohibited use of works under copyright, infringing the copyright owner's exclusive rights, such as the right to reproduce or perform the copyrighted work, or to make derivative works.
Originally posted by Havick007
Why arent the uploaders of the original content being held accountable or tracked down, they upload alot of media, surely they can be tracked... not that i want that either.
So now instead of holding the uploader or the website accountable, the companies are trying to hold the ISP provider accountable.... really?
edit on 3-10-2011 by Havick007 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Havick007
reply to post by ZeroReady
I've always thought it wasnt illegal to actually download it once it's online, the only person that can be held accountable is the provider or person that uploaded the file originally... well i hope thats true, it does make sense though.
Last October, On the Cheap, the California company that owns rights to Danielle Staub Raw, sued those 5,000 illegal downloaders in San Francisco federal court. In filing the suit, On the Cheap joined what has become a swell of litigation between porn movie producers and alleged porno pirates. According to an anonymously-administered website that tracks the data, there have been more than 340 suits claiming video piracy (some assert illegal downloading of non-porn films). The twist in more than 300 of the suits is that the movie producers don’t know the identities of the downloaders. So rather than sue named defendants, they file complaints against John Doe downloaders — sometimes naming thousands of anonymous defendants in a single complaint, as in On the Cheap’s suit against Danielle Staub fans.
That tactic has put the porn piracy cases on the cutting edge of copyright law in the digital era. Movie producers have asked courts to issue subpoenas demanding information from Internet service providers that permits them to identify the alleged illegal downloaders
Originally posted by Havick007
reply to post by Required01
Ok and while we work our asses off every single day for years on end and yet the majority of us will never earn as much in a lifetime as an a grade 'actor' in one movie... let alone the companies and many other people involved..
It's crap!
I work alot harder in my job than standing in front of a camera looking pretty and being something other than yourself.
I wont goto the movies or buy the overpriced dvd's for that very reason, wake up!!