It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Let’s talk about that jobs bill that we can’t pay for but Obama wants to “pass NOW!” More specifically, Title III, Subtitle D of the bill. This section says that employers cannot hire or not hire someone based on their current employment status. Richard Epstein at the Hoover Institute has a great breakdown of the jobs bill as a whole, linked here, and he talks about this piece of the bill at the end of his article and says, “These laws assume, erroneously, that remote administrators have better information as to what characteristics are job-related than the employers whose successful operations depend on making the right calls.”
Originally posted by neo96
So when i heard this my jaw dropped and said what the hell seriously if your unemployed your being discriminated agianst? really now?
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by FurvusRexCaeli
the way it works is a person who has the qualifications for any job they are interview for if they dont have those they dont get the job merely because they think they are entitled to that job.
Originally posted by sarra1833
What I loathe on top of this is that they use your CREDIT HISTORY to see if you can get a job or not. Excuse me????? Just because I have crap credit doesn't mean I am not a hard working person and am loyal to a Tee to the jobs I have held.
Originally posted by neo96
regulation and control hasnt brought jobs back to this country but pushed them out the proof is in the pudding
Maybe it's fair, maybe it's not, but I don't believe prolonging the unemployment of otherwise qualified job-seekers, in favor of students and job-hoppers, is creating any wealth
Originally posted by neo96
unemployed is not a job qualification no matter how much the current administration and their supporters claim it is.
Originally posted by spiritualzombie
Originally posted by neo96
unemployed is not a job qualification no matter how much the current administration and their supporters claim it is.
Discrimination against the jobless is no different, and if you have strong evidence to believe you have been denied a job based on your unemployment (such as an ad that states "The Jobless need not apply") you absolutely have a case for discrimination.edit on 3-10-2011 by spiritualzombie because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by macman
Ok, so, should a company be allowed to not hire due to extended unemployment? Yes. Just as they can state that they won't hire someone for database admin, with no background in database admin.