It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The perfection in English is the precision of the gematriaic content.
All that you present there is DA'ATH, the abyss, knowledge's infinite pit.
The imagination has no limit on it's associations and connections, there's no real quantifiable knowledge there.
Originally posted by graphuto
reply to post by ignant
Funnily enough, if you take those 21 versions and lay out each verse side by side, they all mean the same thing.
We all know that the bible in what amounts to its present day form came around a spot over 300 years after the alleged death of JC. Now in 415 AD the Catholic Church declared that they knew all that there was to know, Cyril, the Archbishop of Alexandria burned the worlds greatest repositry for knowledge, the library at ALexandria and was later made a saint by the church. Being as communication was poor at the time for most of the world the only way to dispute the historical accuracy of the bible was that library. Well now all of the books are gone so the church is the main source for historical information.
Originally posted by DrJay1975
I imagine they would have kept everything which supported the belief structure they were creating. I would also imagine the contradictory pieces were destroyed unless they had infinitely more significance than simply contradicting the historical accuracy of the bible.
Originally posted by DrJay1975
I imagine they would have kept everything which supported the belief structure they were creating. I would also imagine the contradictory pieces were destroyed unless they had infinitely more significance than simply contradicting the historical accuracy of the bible.
"The Codex Sinaiticus has been corrected by so many hands that it affords a most interesting and intricate problem to the palaeographer who wishes to disentangle the various stages by which it has reached its present condition...." --Kirsopp Lake,Introduction of the New Testament Volume.
Originally posted by DrJay1975
Original
"There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus."
First Error
"There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, who do not walk according to the flesh."
Second Error
"There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, who do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the spirit."
Third Error
"There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, who walk according to the flesh, but according to the spirit."
The statements are exact opposites. Changes the meaning significantly.
Originally posted by vedatruth
Does it ring a bell that so many versions of the Bible exist?
There was only one Jesus who preached his gospel.
It is because he did not write any book.
Other people wrote it, after he was gone.
This is the problem with all religious books, they are interpretation by somebody of what a preacher said. This interpretation can be objective or subjective based on the intrepretar.
This is so different from Veda which is pure knowledge. Each mantra is what God says something to man. No human is preaching, or interpreting. There is only a single version of Veda.
A yogi learns Veda in a state of 'samadhi'. And any human can be a yogi without learning a single word of Sanskrit.
This is what I call the word of God. ('shabd brahm' in Sanskrit).
Originally posted by dontreally
Youre exagerrating the significance of English.
Iis easily plausible that "h-a-n-d" was composed by studying the physical anatomy of the human hand. Before the word 'hand' became what it was, man was aware it had so many bones, and so got 'h-a-n-d'.
This is the essential difference the kabbalists note between Hebrew and other languages.
Hebrew was divinely bestowed; it came from without, a projection from the mind of God into human reality.
I dont know if youre new to this, but you will almost always encounter kabbalists/mystics who insist on the superiority and holiness of the Hebrew language to all other languages. It is fairly clear why that is.
The more deeply one analyzes these gematria, the more clear the associations between different worlds and things become.
Its an impressive fact that of the extant Torah scrolls, between Polish, Ukranian, Morroccon, Egyptian, Iranian, etc Jews, that there has only been found to be 9 letter discrepenacies between their versions of the Torah. So neatly, and with care, was the Torah transmitted, that wherever the Jews mirated, the Torah was the same. Only 9 letters amidst hundreds of thousands were either missing or different.
I have no idea what you mean by this.. Just mentioning "daath" doesnt mean anything. Were talking about two different languages. One conveys completely different information from the other. Hebrew, as the holy tongue, is conveying reality as the creator eastablish it.
It is so bloody obvious. You need to show a little more reverence for Hebrew.
It may be old, but is unique. Stands alone. Sanskrit, Arabic, English, may convey crystalized pieces of information about the cosmos, but is only a "relative" truth, which conveys an objective truth to the people, or culture connected to the language, but in itself, cannot be said to match reality as it actually is. Only Hebrew, i am willing to wager, can make that claim.
Originally posted by undo
Originally posted by vedatruth
Does it ring a bell that so many versions of the Bible exist?
There was only one Jesus who preached his gospel.
It is because he did not write any book.
Other people wrote it, after he was gone.
This is the problem with all religious books, they are interpretation by somebody of what a preacher said. This interpretation can be objective or subjective based on the intrepretar.
This is so different from Veda which is pure knowledge. Each mantra is what God says something to man. No human is preaching, or interpreting. There is only a single version of Veda.
A yogi learns Veda in a state of 'samadhi'. And any human can be a yogi without learning a single word of Sanskrit.
This is what I call the word of God. ('shabd brahm' in Sanskrit).
i defend all ancient texts by first, pointing out that the ancient people kept oral histories before they wrote them down. secondly, it makes ZERO sense to suggest everyone lied before 300 years ago, and now everyone tells the truth (except people who claim that it's statistically impossible for everyone to be lying for 5700 years of human history - they are called either liars themselves or naive people who don't see the problems with ancient "myths." it bugs me that modern universities claim our ancient histories, the texts our ancestors went to so much trouble to carve into stone and pen to scrolls and etc is nothing but lies, confabulations, and myths, ).
Myths are not all lies. In fact myths contain a lot of historical facts. But they often also contain hyperbole ('atishyokti' in Sanskrit), and misrepresentations due to limited understanding of the person writing or telling the story.
The inscriptions have been done for varying reasons - some are just legal code. Some may be record of trade (especially clay tablets, which were used from Babylonia to China in ancient world). Only rare ones contain a myth, associated with an historical event.
Bharat always had a culture of writing on paper, made of leaves of bhoj trees.
Veda never changed (ever) because yogis have rediscovered Veda time and again.