It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hanslune
Originally posted by Blue Shift
I think it will eventually be determined that humans as we know ourselves today got their start in south central Asia,
In the sub-continent?
Originally posted by DemonSpeedN
The origin of mankind is simple, we start in the garden of Eden with Adam and Eve which were white or caucasian. According to the Bible they had children, the result of cain killing abel resulted in God cursing cain with dark skin, thus we have black people or africans. Then after the global flood with Noah, his children created the other nationalities. .
The people of the world from Adam and Eve spoke english till the Tower of Babel
No, no. In-between the Caspian and Aral Seas. Near where we first domesticated the horse. Unfortunately, because the climate is (or at least was) so mild there, and our ancestors apparently tended to bury their dead, fossils are hard to come by.
Also, in order for human beings to have developed, they had to be subjected to a very nasty environment from which they barely survived. Maybe glaciation at that location? It seems to me that Africa has been too relatively environmentally stable for a hominid population to reach the levels for low number crisis-driven evolution. But.
Easy to say, hard to prove.
Originally posted by SmArTbEaTz
I think mainstream science will find a way to ignore it because of the repercussions...
I doubt you will see too many well known scientists encourage these findings in threat of being ridiculed for their beliefs. Too bad really when we could really learn a ton about our past if the resources were made and focused with a common goal.
Originally posted by autowrench
reply to post by stirling
Starred and Flagged, friend. I wonder what the Zecharia Sitchin haters and debunkers are saying about this now, not to mention the millions who think "God" created humankind.
still will not relent to massive evidence
Originally posted by stirling
The controversey continues. Like it or not the ancient 250,000 yr old ruins in south africa do exist.They were discovered from the air.
The Annunaki is another theory that has its detractors and its supporters.
Instead of everyone keeping their mind open, we all immediately get on our ego horses and ride off into the fray to scrap for the one we prefer to have happened. Every one using the speculations/information as weapons to batter the other theorists.
We obviously have been on earth for much longer than our archaeologists purport.
That the south american ruins predate those who are credited with their construction seems far more likely.They donet claim they built them either.....
In the spanish exploration days there is a story of a temple light, which was always burning being discovered in one of the edifaces. It is said to have been a primitive version of a voltaic cell that powered it.
I may be reading too much fringe stuff, but the mainstream seems rather stiltified and unwilling to take certain obvious facts.
Things like the east indian records Gitas etc seem to get little attention.
Yet they detail much of what we have today, from heavier than air flight to orbital space travels etc.
Instead of regarding these as fables , perhaps an honest attempt to build one of these mercury motors is in order?
Anomalous objects, called deep time objects have been discovered that screw the dates of the whole timeline we are given by mstream.
With a four billion yr old earth there is lots of possibilities to examine....
Originally posted by DemonSpeedNreply to post by Hanslune
That's fine if you don't believe it or not. I just can't understand why people have to have concrete scientific proof when it come's to religion.
It seems that nobody can take anything on faith, especially when considering the source like God.
Yes there's the research on DNA and stuff, did you ever think that there's a possibility that it might be wrong or off a just a little.
Science is always learning, always evolving, where you faith does not change because you just know it.
Originally posted by metaldemon2000
reply to post by Hanslune
Yet the genetic makeup of human beings is different from the rest of the mammals on this planet also we are missing two chromosomes. Not to mention our brains function differently.
Either way why does the white race have such a low tolerance to the sun? Higher rates of skin cancer, increased photosensitivity of the eyes. More suitable to colder climates. Perfect for conditions on mars if mars contained life.
Originally posted by DemonSpeedN
The origin of mankind is simple, we start in the garden of Eden with Adam and Eve which were white or caucasian. According to the Bible they had children, the result of cain killing abel resulted in God cursing cain with dark skin,
Then after the global flood with Noah, his children created the other nationalities.
Originally posted by downunderET
Originally posted by SmArTbEaTz
I think mainstream science will find a way to ignore it because of the repercussions...
I doubt you will see too many well known scientists encourage these findings in threat of being ridiculed for their beliefs. Too bad really when we could really learn a ton about our past if the resources were made and focused with a common goal.
I agree, just like Cremo & Thompson' "Forbidden Archology"
Funny thing I was listening to the Red Ice Radio interview with Michael Cremo, and he was saying that he had many letters from university students, who had read his book, and then got into HUGE arguments with their college professors.
It's amazing how the cabalistic academia still will not relent to massive evidence, that makes all the text book theories look like the Flinstones!!!