Originally posted by EmilNomel
why do i even bother talking to:
Actually, my mind is very much open. I am more than willing to change my stance should compelling evidence be presented. But hey, you heard about the
guy a couple of hours ago so you're the expert.
Eh? That's a non sequitur.
Jealous of what? How is this comment pertinent to mine?
sure people die all the time...
All the time and every time.
and according to your logic that means that no one has ever been poisoned and thus killed by others?
That's a straw man. Where did I say that no one has ever been poisoned? Point out the part of my post where I specifically said that. But seeing as
you mention it, post up the evidence that he was
poisoned. I'm assuming you have evidence in abundance seeing as you've become an expert on
the guy within a couple of hours.
what a ridiculous and poor explanation without any proof on your claim what so ever!
The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate that it was foul play. That is how these things work: you make a claim, you provide the evidence to
support your claim.
hmmm... mysteriously died maybe because he was poisoned by uranium?
if his invention did not work and was a scam as you quickly try to accuse... then why was he offered 1 billion dollars by the oil
See above. More unfounded statements. This is the Science & Technology forum, not the Baseless Claims & Unsubstantiated Conjecture forum. Present
, of which I'm sure you have loads considering you are so sure in your beliefs. I'd hate to think you were accepting any old bunkum
as the credible information.
perhaps your own jealousy quickly accuses (without even a short pause for a thought) others of being scam artists wile listening to your closed
minded old rubbish inner ego?
Again, what exactly am I supposed to be jealous of? You have yet to make this clear.
...you ever thought of that??
Funnily enough, no, because you are not making sense. See above.
ok, so you say i lack critical thinking...
that maybe is a small fault on my part
That's a pretty big fault on your part. You are responding with your emotions rather than engaging with your brain.
(i'm not perfect)
but, all that you have is critical thinking as the perfect critic who is quick to judge others and accusing them for whatever you can think of
Actually, critical thinking is "logical thinking that draws conclusions from facts and evidence". I'd say that's pretty important for forming
opinions and engaging in debate.
without any proof what so ever...
Again, the burden of proof is on you. Your claims are extraordinary, therefore you need to present extraordinary proof. Where is the proof of murder,
over unity and the $1b corporate pay off?
offending and insulting them just because they say something that's not to your ego's liking!
If an unwillingness to accept baseless claims without any supporting evidence is offensive and insulting, that is your problem. You speak of egos, yet
you are the one who has responded in an emotional manner like someone who has their ego bruised. If your pride gets in the way of reason, that is your
problem, not mine.