It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Roger_T, let's turn your argument around. You expect me to trawl through his website and pick through his "Chemistry and Math". You seem to accept his "paper" as valid, so I want to know on what basis. Evidently it's passed your personal peer-review so I'm assuming you have relevant qualifications. Do you have a PhD in chemistry and are you active in the area of research your PhD was awarded in? No? Lets leave it to the experts then, that's what the peer-review process is for. Post up the peer-reviewed research of his that supports his (and your) claims.
I don't have a a PhD in chemistry but I am a PhD student in an unrelated field who has research both accepted and rejected for publication through the peer review process so I'm intimately familiar with the strict requirements for good, sound research that is required for publication in credible journals. I am absolutely confident that the referees reviewing on behalf of credible journals pertinent to the relevant fields of research have the credentials and experience to assess whether Mr. Puharic's results and methodology are valid and sound. I don't accept his claims at face value and I certainly don't hold your vouch for him in high regard seeing as you do not have the credentials and training to confidently asses his findings. Let's see what the experts say, post up his journal publications that support his claims!
So enough side-stepping, enough straw man diversions, enough ducking the burden of proof and shifting it on to me, post up the peer-reviewed research that Mr. Puharic has published in credible journals that demonstrates he is indeed getting more energy out of the hydrogen splitting process than he is putting in. As they say, "put up or shut up". Enough excuses!
Originally posted by hudsonhawk69
reply to post by john_bmth
here is stan meyers indepent test www.waterfuelcell.org...
Originally posted by john_bmth
Originally posted by hudsonhawk69
reply to post by john_bmth
here is stan meyers indepent test www.waterfuelcell.org...
Right, so I downloaded the pdf and had a skim. There's a bunch of patent applications along with some dodgy "paper" that was published at a non peer-reviewed conference followed by all sorts of random stuff like scans of textbooks other strange, non-pertinent things. Care to highlight exactly where in this 140 page nonsensical mish mash of random stuff is the independent laboratory tests that demonstrate over unity?
Originally posted by john_bmth
Care to highlight exactly where in this 140 page nonsensical mish mash of random stuff is the independent laboratory tests that demonstrate over unity?
Originally posted by spoor
Originally posted by john_bmth
Care to highlight exactly where in this 140 page nonsensical mish mash of random stuff is the independent laboratory tests that demonstrate over unity?
He cannot , as there has been no such test. Meyer is just another convicted fraudster
Originally posted by hudsonhawk69
Wow!.. It's amazing to me that on a conspiracy theory web site people can be so blantently close minded even in the face of the proven facts.
Originally posted by spoor
Originally posted by hudsonhawk69
Wow!.. It's amazing to me that on a conspiracy theory web site people can be so blantently close minded even in the face of the proven facts.
very true, as some people refuse to accept that Meyer was found guilty of fraud, and was forced to return money to investors.. That is a proven fact, that some people refuse to accept.
Originally posted by hudsonhawk69
Is that going to be the basis of your arguement?
Originally posted by spoor
Originally posted by hudsonhawk69
Is that going to be the basis of your arguement?
The basis of your argument is a convicted fraud, who is unable to provide any independent tests of his device, says it works, so I believe him when he claims it works
Originally posted by hudsonhawk69
should come up with some scientific evidence that water fuel cells don't work than feel free to let me know.
Originally posted by hudsonhawk69
here is another one. www.rexresearch.com...
Originally posted by C64Warrior
What he and his friend achieved so far, is that they use the alternator to generator hydrogen and mix it together somehow with the air/petrol mix in the combustion chamber. That way they save around 30% of petrol.
edit on 4.10.2011 by C64Warrior because: (no reason given)