It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You apparently didn't read the Popular Mechanics articles I cited in this thread. They not only THOUGHT of testing it, they DID test several of them, and countless other contraptions that claim to improve gas mileage. Virtually none of them made it better, and many of them made the mileage worse. With HHO it was slightly worse. They were deluged with people who claimed huge improvements but cited the reasons they are skeptical, one of which is the bias or driving style changes you mentioned. That's one reason they did testing on a dynamometer.
Originally posted by daskakik
If someone puts one of these things in their car and they say they see improved milage then, giving them the benefit of the doubt, it's not a question of "can it work?" but "what is actually causing this?".
Now it could just be a biased observation or even a change in driving style but it might be something someone hasn't thought of testing before.
You mean like this?
Originally posted by brindle
Simple magnets can propel a car.One small one and two others,1 for forward and one for reverse.Extend 2 poles into the drivers seat to go either forward or reverse ,no problem.What seems to be the discussion here.
The ForkenSwift is a 1992 Geo Metro converted from gasoline to electric power with used forklift parts (electric motor, etc.), used golf cart batteries (and a golf cart motor controller) and a pair of near-dead "host" cars.
I dont have a car, I ride a horse for transportation.I would never pay for gas.At 3 dollars a gallons, thats ridiculous.If i ever needed gas, I would go to the coast of saudia arabia,fill up up a tanker of a 200, 000 gallonsI I would buy the refined gas at 60 a gallon,transport it home, then sell the rest.Gas is overpriced fool.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
You mean like this?
Originally posted by brindle
Simple magnets can propel a car.One small one and two others,1 for forward and one for reverse.Extend 2 poles into the drivers seat to go either forward or reverse ,no problem.What seems to be the discussion here.
knowyourmeme.com...
Did you notice the name of that site is troll science? Does that make you a troll? Or are you actually powering your own personal car with magnets as you describe?
Originally posted by autowrench
You maybe getting better gas mileage by creating a more efficient combustion in the cylinder and eaking out all the power that gallon of gasoline can produce.That's not the same as running solely on hydrogen created by onboard electrolysis.
Please show me where I said that I was running on HHO alone?
quote "screwed":
Can someone please tell me why you couldn't generate the electrolysis process using the already existing alternator?
It would work like this.
A separate deep cell battery is designated to the electrolysis system.
You get in the car, flip a switch, and the bubbles begin to rise and gas begins to accumulate in the water cannister in the trunk.
Pressure begins to build, feeding the Hydrogen/O2 mixture to the fuel injection manifold on the engine,
then it's time to start the car.
Once started, the alternator begins generating the electricity needed to keep the system going.
The only problem I see is the ability to keep the pressure at a manageable rate.
Too much pressure and somethings gonna blow.
Too little and the engine dies.
But the idea is still solid.
Originally posted by autowrench
I will not be posting it in this forum. I will just keep it for myself, and my friends and family.
Originally posted by daskakik
reply to post by Arbitrageur
They should just discontinue ICE. Like vacum tube TVs. That would guarantee volume. Hey maybe that was what the bailouts were. A government incentive to retool and phase out gas guzzlers.
Off time don't cost anything and it's worth less if your doing something you enjoy. Heck you usually have to pay for entertainment. These guys probably had a ball and now get the same miles as a gallon of gas for less than a buck.
Time better spent than mucking about with HHO because people can't let go of the ICE. That is mainly why I posted it because earlier in the thread the price of electric cars was presented as prohibitive.
edit on 1-10-2011 by daskakik because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by gamesmaster63
Are people having a hard time understanding that autowrench is using the HHO (hydrogen and oxygen developed electolytically from H2O...water) as a fuel additive, not as the primary fuel source?
That is what I read from his posts.
Originally posted by john_bmth
Originally posted by mutatismutandis
reply to post by john_bmth
You do realize you are attempting to insight arguement in a post who's soul intention is to further their reasearch of said subject. Your only intention thus far has been to come here just to call us all idiots when the op was asking for assistance. If you're so insistent that your point of view is correct seeing how you obviously feel your futher educated than anyone else in this post, then go publish your own findings in your prestigious scientific journal and leave the real science to those actively trying to make a difference. It'd be a lot more constructive than spouting off to those that don't care for your input in a sad attempt to bewiddle us.
Originally posted by RogerT
john_bgmth does this in every thread discussing this subject. He actually seems to believe he is making a contribution to the poor feeble minds that don't wish to see life through his own personal world view. It appears to be a 'defender of the faith', 'missionary' type thing.
Debating with him is absolutely pointless. Even if you post facts and figures, rather than personal observation and opinion, he'll either ignore them or revert to his favorite mantra "show me the peer reviewed paper" (as if the corrupt, broken peer review system is the gatekeeper of truth :rofl
Only way to keep the thread on track is to simply ignore him. I apologise to the OP for feeding the troll, I should know better
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
but it seems like turning the engine off would be the best solution if it wasn't so inefficient to restart it.
This revolutionary TwinAir engine, however, takes the car to a new level, adding brains to its beauty. Some critics are even hailing the 875cc twin-cylinder turbocharged unit as one of the greatest leaps forward in engine technology in the past 20 years