It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Swift Boat crew member Robert Lambert, Wednesday, says he is no supporter of John Kerry, but backs up Kerry's version of the now-disputed events that led to Bronze Stars for both men in Vietnam.
Originally posted by koji_K
anti-war protesters may have helped turn the tide of public sentiment against the war (although i have a feeling the body bags did a whole lot more). but, why should america fight a war that's against public opinion? were we not a democracy then? saying "we might have won, if we had public support" kind of defeats the purpose of calling america democratic. what, exactly, would we have been fighting FOR if the bulk of the people didn't support the war in the first place? the right of our government to do what it pleases despite the will of its people?
-koji K.
Originally posted by RANT
We "lost" Vietnam because of Kerry jrsdls?
Does that mean if it weren't for Kerry, we'd still be in Vietnam "winning?"
By your logic, how many years did Kerry take off the end of the Vietnam war? How many American lives did he save?
Had Kerry never spoken, how would Vietnam have changed in any measurable way? Explain this vision of total victory for me in terms of outcome, additional years in quagmire and American lives lost.
Originally posted by koji_K
hehehe... Oliver North says Kerry aided and abetted the enemy! Oliver "arms for hostages" North!
-koji K.
Originally posted by jrsdls
Originally posted by koji_K
hehehe... Oliver North says Kerry aided and abetted the enemy! Oliver "arms for hostages" North!
-koji K.
One big point here koji, We were not at war at that time. What North did was wrong, but he stood up and faced the charges like a man, unlike Kerry who refuses to discuss anything about his lies.
Originally posted by koji_K
Originally posted by jrsdls
Originally posted by koji_K
hehehe... Oliver North says Kerry aided and abetted the enemy! Oliver "arms for hostages" North!
-koji K.
One big point here koji, We were not at war at that time. What North did was wrong, but he stood up and faced the charges like a man, unlike Kerry who refuses to discuss anything about his lies.
ah yes, if standing up and facing your charges like a man is accomplished by lying to congress in an attempt to cover your ass....
-koji K.
Originally posted by Apollyon
Read General Gaip's book the NVA was about to collapse the Vietcong were spent after Tet. The OIC of all North Vietnamese forces admits with only slightly more pressure the Whole North would have fallen. The war was "lost" politically not militarily
Originally posted by nativeokie
When Kerry testified before congress he said in his testimony that in a meeting with over 100 veterans, many high decoracted they recounted those stories for him. In other words it was heresay, plain and simple. the swift boat vets fail to put that part in their ad, instead trying to make you think he did those things. Now I think he did admit he did some things like firing on villages, etc. Guess what? My father who served 2 tours in Vietnam as part of an elite Marine force says the same thing. He said the policy was the destroy villages and then rebuild if there were enough people left. We had a really rough policy at the time towards the citizens there mainly becuase we could not tell enemy from friend.
Originally posted by jrsdls
Bush did not bring this war up, Kerry did, when he reported for duty. Face it, If Kerry were a Republican, the Swifties would still do this, as well as Veterans against Kerry, Special Forces against Kerry, POW/MIAs against Kerry. It not a partisan attack, It a personal one. hard to vote for someone who turned thier back on you.
Originally posted by jrsdls
koji, you asked why should America fight a war that's against public opinion, let me ask, How old are you? not trying to disparge you, but just wondering. just prior to both World War I and World War II, most Americans were aginst getting involved in a european affair.
Originally posted by jrsdls
Well using your logic, either Kerry lied to Congress or his a war criminal. Do YOU want a war criminal as President?
Originally posted by jrsdls
Show me the proof that Bush was AWOL, and I don't want to see Micheal Moore documents. I want to see where Bush was charge with being AWOL. you use baseless banter to bring discredit upon the president, which is your choice, but you have no proof. We know that Kerry lied about Cambodia, lied about his purple hearts. What proof do you have?