Top 10 Worst Diseases, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 29-9-2011 @ 10:14 PM by brilab45
reply to post by SecretKnowledge



We are both in the same shoes. I will call the CDC for us both. :-)


reply posted on 29-9-2011 @ 10:15 PM by brilab45
reply to post by MikeZutch



Check out the video first. Don't blame the messenger.


reply posted on 29-9-2011 @ 10:16 PM by brilab45
reply to post by Bonkrh



I'm not a virologist or doctor. Truly, I thought the same thing.


reply posted on 29-9-2011 @ 10:16 PM by MikeZutch
reply to post by brilab45



It's important to research things on ATS before posting things to everyone.


reply posted on 29-9-2011 @ 10:18 PM by brilab45
reply to post by MikeZutch



Umm, I would have to an advanced degree to read through all the medical data and come up with an answer. Thanx for the put down. Ugh!


reply posted on 29-9-2011 @ 10:21 PM by MikeZutch
reply to post by brilab45



Not really. You just search Ebola, and you get a chart from the CDC that shows how many deaths and when they occurred. You can do that for all of the other diseases as well.

I'm not putting you down either, you just have to see where misinformation is bad.


reply posted on 29-9-2011 @ 10:26 PM by brilab45
reply to post by MikeZutch



Did you bother to look at the video? I'm just asking before you make a blanket statement. I would respect that you would give me better feedback and discuss your conclusions in a manner that is in accordance with ATS standards. I thank you in advance.



reply posted on 29-9-2011 @ 10:32 PM by MikeZutch
reply to post by brilab45



No I didn't, because the video for Ebola isn't available. I am giving you feedback in accordance with ATS standards.



15). Posting: You will not Post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate.


Those can go along with the information you posted, since it is all three.

Now as i've said before, the one for Ebola is wrong, I haven't looked at the other stats because Ebola was the one that jumped out at me first, and it is very incorrect. UNLESS, they are talking solely about other animals, then that may be a realistic statement. Even then, i'm not positive.


reply posted on 29-9-2011 @ 10:38 PM by brilab45
reply to post by MikeZutch



Your right so far. Fair enough. I will continue to research to find definitive information that is more reliable. You are right about animals being included in the contagion. However, give me some time to find better facts and figures than Wikipedia or other known false information sites.


reply posted on 29-9-2011 @ 10:41 PM by MikeZutch
Originally posted by brilab45
reply to
post by MikeZutch



Your right so far. Fair enough. I will continue to research to find definitive information that is more reliable. You are right about animals being included in the contagion. However, give me some time to find better facts and figures than Wikipedia or other known false information sites.


Please don't put this argument between us. It's just that I didn't want people to interpret the information wrong. If you go to www.cdc.gov , you can find some very useful information, and easily too !


reply posted on 29-9-2011 @ 10:44 PM by brilab45
reply to post by MikeZutch



Oh, no I'm not offended in any way. But I do think there are other sources than the CDC. Were cool. No beef with you. Thanx for pointing the issue out to me.


reply posted on 29-9-2011 @ 10:48 PM by Sanndy
Originally posted by brilab45
reply to
post by MikeZutch



Your right so far. Fair enough. I will continue to research to find definitive information that is more reliable. You are right about animals being included in the contagion. However, give me some time to find better facts and figures than Wikipedia or other known false information sites.


Wikipedia is not a source, it is a tool and the wiki for Ebola actually has much lower numbers on its page than the headline of the article that links back to it.
Kinda soundes like nobody read it and checked the citations but me?


reply posted on 29-9-2011 @ 11:13 PM by brilab45
reply to post by MikeZutch



You are absolutely correct. Up to 1850 people have died from Ebola. Got the information from the World Health Organization. Research definitely makes things more plausible. However, it was a generalized post.

There is no way I could have researched 10 different diseases with any accuracy. This is a conspiracy website. All things posted are not always correct.

Thank you for keeping me on my toes. Here is the link from WHO: www.who.int...

Yes, I was wrong in promoting facts and figures that are not FACTUAL. However, I can't be responsible for every website that promotes inaccuracies. It happens here frequently.

Edited to add: Star for you!
edit on 29-9-2011 by brilab45 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 30-9-2011 @ 06:40 AM by MikeZutch
Originally posted by brilab45
reply to
post by MikeZutch



Oh, no I'm not offended in any way. But I do think there are other sources than the CDC. Were cool. No beef with you. Thanx for pointing the issue out to me.


Yay for civility ! Good job finding the WHO link as well.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



The Church of HIV: Inventing the AIDS Virus
  Posted 7 days ago with 64 member flags
DIY lets cure cancer simple as that
  Posted 3 days ago with 19 member flags
Why are dead people waking up around the world?
  Posted 6 days ago with 12 member flags
Dying For A Smile
  Posted 14 days ago with 11 member flags
Harvard To Be Tried for Alzheimer\'s Research Fraud
  Posted 7 days ago with 10 member flags
Man loses penis to flesh eating bacteria
  Posted 6 days ago with 9 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Pacifism is cowardice!
  The Gray Area: 7 hours ago, 86 replies
Zombie decomposition and death
  Survival: 12 hours ago, 45 replies
No more. I'm done.
  Rant: 10 hours ago, 45 replies