An auburn Bigfoot? Screams orang-utan to me. Looks like 1 in the initial screenshot as well. Why an Orang-utan would be swinging about tree's in Ontario is beyond me, but its more logical than it being a Bigfoot.
Dont get me wrong, Im not a complete disbeliever of sasquatch, just dont think this is a video of 1.
cheers,
L

Originally posted by AbdulAlhazred
An auburn Bigfoot? Screams orang-utan to me. Looks like 1 in the initial screenshot as well. Why an Orang-utan would be swinging about tree's in Ontario is beyond me, but its more logical than it being a Bigfoot.
Dont get me wrong, Im not a complete disbeliever of sasquatch, just dont think this is a video of 1.
cheers,
L

Tend to agree with you and considering Canadian laws for keeping wild animals as a private collection was (in the last few years following death and injuries of family members/owners) very relaxed only to be tightened up as of late - sorry don't know the dates but I'm sure private owners rather than adhere to regulation or keeping animals without the authorities being aware would simply allow them to live free - these people get very attached and would rather they be freed than taken to some kind of zoo.

what i like about the bigfoot phenomenon, is that it may actually be proven true one day. dna evidencee or a body would basicly be one of the biggest stories of the century overnight. the likelyhood of it happeneing are much greater than more unprovable super natural/paranormal events. bigfoot/yetti has some legitimate science (evolution) on its side.

Originally posted by predator0187
This is a strange video and another one that peaked my attention.

It's either a hoax or they don't understand what the "object" might really be. Potentially an out of focus bug.

Its' clear that nothing of any significant mass is in those trees as nothing is happening to the trees as the "blob" moves from one to the other.

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord

Originally posted by predator0187
This is a strange video and another one that peaked my attention.

It's either a hoax or they don't understand what the "object" might really be. Potentially an out of focus bug.

Its' clear that nothing of any significant mass is in those trees as nothing is happening to the trees as the "blob" moves from one to the other.

Agreed. A Bigfoot would probably collapse those trees, or at least top them. Particularly if estimates of over a 1000 pounds or more for an average BF are correct. I have a tendency to go with the escaped monkey theory for both of the incidents shown in this video. I'm sure a BF could climb a big tree in an emergency, but swinging around on the small upper branches? I don't think so somehow...

The video is so bad, even the trees are blurry and distorted. Fail.

Originally posted by predator0187
What else would be flying through the trees like that?

Squirrels, birds, monkeys, etc.

All we have is the videographer's word for the context, which is dubious at best.

I personally just cannot buy that Sasquatches are tree-dwelling animals. They don't seem to be built for it. The creatures in the video are obviously primates, and to me they look so very similar to chimps...At one point I could have sworn some of the movements also looked like those of an Orangutan. Either or, I still do not think these are Sasquatches.

However, I couldn't make out the other creatures that were supposedly there, off to the left when the camera pans. My analysis is basically from the one creature I could see in the tree...Or two rather. They also look somewhat small. Juvenile Sasquatch you say? Possibly.

The arm length would be consistent with a known primate as well, and although I have a belief on the arm length of Sasquatches, that isn't really anything definitive to go on...Only definitive enough to conclude that a creature is either an ape or it isn't. So this is most likely an ape, but I hold reservations that it is a juvenile Sasquatch. Maybe I am wrong, and I hope I am...Did anyone else think that guy's name was an awesome Bigfoot hunter name?