It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The next big step in the gold standard debate is going to be taken next month at Washington, when one of the original members of the Reagan-era United States Gold Commission offers a five-step plan to return America to sound money.
The architect of the plan, Lewis Lehrman, a businessman and scholar, will present his program in an address October 5 at a conference in Washington on the how to return to a stable dollar. He will outline a five-step program to return America to a gold-backed currency within five years.
What is significant about the event is its aim of shifting the discussion to practical steps that could be taken to rescue the American monetary system. It comes as the value of the United States dollar has collapsed to record lows, sinking at one point this month to less than an 1,800th of an ounce of gold.
Originally posted by grey580
This is a stroke of genius "if" we actually have the reserves to pull this off.
Otherwise we are wasting our time.
Plan To Return America To the Gold Standard Set To Be Offered at Washington
Originally posted by neo96
lets run with that governemt figure of 1 trillion in circulation
so that would mean we would need 625 million ounces of gold to back that 1 trillion at $1600 an ounce
fort knox only holds 147 million. if my math is right
Originally posted by mileslong54
Originally posted by grey580
This is a stroke of genius "if" we actually have the reserves to pull this off.
Otherwise we are wasting our time.
There is the problem, there is more paper money than there is gold backing it
The Question of Gold Money: Is There Enough? (by Republicae)
Submitted by Republicae on Mon, 06/22/2009 - 19:27 in Daily Paul Liberty Forum
The most commonly held misconception is that the supply of gold, either globally or in U.S. reserve, is insufficient to serve as money. One of the common adages pertaining to gold is that there is not enough flexibility in the money supply to sustain the growing needs of either the U.S. or global economy, thus the only option is fiat.
Of course, the ones that hold such misconceptions are the very ones who support, most whole-heartedly, the fiat system and the power it allows both the government and central bankers of the world. Another claim, among many, is that a gold monetary system would make it difficult for a country to isolate itself from the economic woes of the rest of the world. Strange, but it appears that the fiat monetary system is much more problematic in such terms. Yet another claim is that a gold monetary system does not permit wide exchange rate changes and is resistant to government controls over both domestic and international trade and the payment of that trade. That of course, is true, but such restrictions on the ability of government to place such controls only allows for a freer market. All of such claims are usually found in those circles of people who are either centralists or globalists or both.
Factually of course, none of the criticisms about a free market gold monetary system are true, they are fabricated either intentionally or held out of a stance of complete ignorance of monetary mechanics. Gold cannot be easily regimented by governments or, for that matter banks and it does not lend itself therefore, very well to regimented economies.
One last claim against gold is that there just is not enough gold to reestablish the U.S. dollar's redeemability. It is true that the number of paper and credit dollars created has been so vast that there is not enough gold to redeem dollars at the original rate of $20 to the ounce. But, we can recognize reality and reestablish the dollar at an appropriate rate of approximately $2000 to the ounce. Murray N. Rothbard has proposed just such a program in The Mystery of Banking:
That the dollar be defined as 1/1696 gold ounce.
That the Fed take the gold out of Fort Knox and the other Treasury depositories, and that the gold then be used (a) to redeem outright all Federal Reserve Notes, and (b) to be given to the commercial banks, liquidating in return all their deposit accounts at the Fed...I propose that the most convenient definition is one that will enable us, at one and the same time as returning to a gold standard, to denationalize gold and to abolish the Federal Reserve System.
Originally posted by whaaa
that won't happen either because most money doesn't exist as currency, but as ones and zeros in a data bank;
Originally posted by letscit
man ron paul should be just utterly flattered lately. it seems more and more politicians and crooks are picking up on his idea's, calling them their own and trying to run with it. but i dont believe them, they have a catch that i believe ron paul does not. i dont know what their catch is exactly but i promise it wont be good for the working man.
Originally posted by neo96
yep there is not enough gold in the world
to cover the 1 trillion dollars in fiat currency in circulation according to the federal website so yeah right
another problem was long as the barrel of oil is tied to the dollar
its never going to happen we should have never been taken off the gold standard
im just waiting for another repeat of history the us governments confiscation of the citizens gold.edit on 28-9-2011 by neo96 because: (no reason given)