It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama will win. As predicted. And guess who's tho blame...

page: 13
18
<< 10  11  12   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 30 2011 @ 08:18 AM
link   
reply to post by cornucopia
 


That video has turned me against Romney. I wasn't much a fan of his before the Florida Debate. He won me over somewhat during the events and the debate, but being against MJ is so illogical that I cannot support anyone that opposes it. There isn't a lick of science or fact to back up its harsh criminal penalties.

No more Romney for me. Looks like Ron Paul is my only one in the race now.



posted on Sep, 30 2011 @ 09:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by kellynap43
reply to post by merkaba93
 


He can’t define his position? Is that why he jumped up 11 points this morning in the most current poll?
He has a plan(999) Unlike obama- Hope and change. Hows that working out for you?

What experience did the current president have with foreign policy prior to his presidency?

And what about business experience? Where is Obama on that? Oh yea, he was a community organizer. A little hint, Community organizer does not qualify you for president.



You simply attack, because you know your candidate has no substance or success record to run on. Or else you would be bragging about that.

Move along


Cain is federal reserve insider. The fed is the root of our financial issues.

Cain is a Keynsian.

I am a Ron Paul guy and have been for over 10 years. Why would you assume I am an Obama supporter?



posted on Sep, 30 2011 @ 10:32 AM
link   
reply to post by Gorman91
 


I have to butt in here - English Person speaking - the English riots haven't united diddly-squat. Everyone has a different reason why they happened and how to deal with them.



posted on Sep, 30 2011 @ 10:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by kellynap43
reply to post by merkaba93
 


He can’t define his position? Is that why he jumped up 11 points this morning in the most current poll?
He has a plan(999) Unlike obama- Hope and change. Hows that working out for you?

What experience did the current president have with foreign policy prior to his presidency?

And what about business experience? Where is Obama on that? Oh yea, he was a community organizer. A little hint, Community organizer does not qualify you for president.



You simply attack, because you know your candidate has no substance or success record to run on. Or else you would be bragging about that.

Move along


Herman also supports the North American Union.

Herman's name is at the bottom.

And seriously the 999 thing is insane. Adding a national sales tax on top of existing income taxes? Plus state taxes already in existence? Pushing 20% sales tax combined in the socialist states like Kalifornia.



posted on Sep, 30 2011 @ 10:55 AM
link   
reply to post by FlyingSpaghettiMonster
 


The response itself united them, to some degree at least. It's all an ongoing conservative affect. I certainly wouldn't imagine the PM denouncing multiculturalism a decade ago.



posted on Sep, 30 2011 @ 11:38 AM
link   
reply to post by merkaba93
 


The Herman Cain 9-9-9 Tax Plan will REPLACE the existing Tax Plan.
--------
It's really someone else coming up with the 9-9-9 plan. Cain is not willing to tell who it is.
Herman Cain is just the messenger.
The 9-9-9 plan has problems but at least Herman has a plan.
Where are the other solutions?
---------
It's entertaining to watch Michelle Bachmann get that deer in the headlights look on her
face when the big question gets thrown at her.
If i earn $1 dollar under your tax system, how much do i get to keep???

50 cents of every dollar? 75 cents?

Her answer is i want you to keep the whole $1 BUT we have bills to pay at the federal
government.
---------
Didn't Ronald Reagan give us a flat tax back in the 80s???



posted on Sep, 30 2011 @ 03:13 PM
link   
reply to post by captainnotsoobvious
 






COULD be, But just because I am paranoid, DOES NOT mean I am totally wrong!!

Like I said, just my 2 cents.

But I am thoroughly enjoying reading through all of the excellent posts and gleaning what truth I can from the madness.

Keep calm and carry on fellow truth seeker!!!

Peace




posted on Oct, 1 2011 @ 10:55 PM
link   
All the people behind Obama are from wall st so he is bought and paid for and he is doing their biding. Things seem to have been on the fast track lately too so I think more of the same is to come.



posted on Oct, 1 2011 @ 11:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by celticdog
All the people behind Obama are from wall st so he is bought and paid for and he is doing their biding. Things seem to have been on the fast track lately too so I think more of the same is to come.


So who is behind the GOP/TPM? Same what?



posted on Oct, 2 2011 @ 12:55 PM
link   
reply to post by captainnotsoobvious
 


Ron paul is exploding,and for change to happen,for the better,ron has to win.



posted on Oct, 2 2011 @ 01:29 PM
link   
reply to post by captainnotsoobvious
 


The GOP have no interest in winning. Same as 08. Iyt makes FAR more sense politically to ride out 8 years of Obama, giving a great 'reason' for all the economic problems in the country. Them, in 2016, they can re-emerge re-branded and ready to 'take America back' or some such jive.

Then, another 8 years, and repeat with the Dems.

Lather, rinse, repeat until Apocalypse.



posted on Oct, 2 2011 @ 01:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by kellynap43
reply to post by captainnotsoobvious
 


NO president has been reelected when unemployment is 9.0% plus

That is a fact. Deal with it.



It's EXACTLY this sort of thinking that will help ensure Obamas re-election in 2012 (much to the delight of the movers and shakers behind the GOP). The Republicans cant win just blaming Obama for high unemployment. It plays well to the base, who already blame Obama, but it isnt actually substantive enough to play to the larger American voting public. One has to be FOR something. That is part of the OP's point. The GOP 'candidates' so far are spending so much time attacking each other and Obama, they havent taken much time to talk about what they would actually do. This ensures the general public, especially swing voters and moderates, will not be interested in voting GOP.

But, again, this still all plays out VERY well for a massive GOP victory in 2016, which has been the plan since at least 06/07. This is the 'tank-the-economy-and-pin-all-the-blame-on-Obama' plan that even the DNC is in on. Pay attention.



posted on Oct, 2 2011 @ 04:15 PM
link   
No.

Well...maybe.

But Perry is their boy. Of course Obama is their boy. Some of the Republican candidates are going to be part of his staffl. The PTB is going to get him in their whether we like it or not. He will be illegally installed-vote fraud-and it will be plain as day as to what's going on. It doesn't matter that the numbers don't support this. The PTB are going to quit hiding what they are doing. They are brazenly going to put him in there and no one is going to like it.

The popular vote-if anyone cared what the people want-would be Ron Paul. The more they try to ignore him or downplay, the more fuel it adds to his fire.

The war against the people is going to be escalated when Perry gets elected and this will be reflected in his policies.



posted on Oct, 2 2011 @ 11:57 PM
link   
Voters decide who wins.
Obama is a gentleman yet strong and a good speaker
and has a good chance of winning the second term
and it may well be good for usa.



posted on Oct, 3 2011 @ 12:44 AM
link   
lol did you really just use this Obama thread to sling mud at Ron Paul again?

And who predicted this? you? lol...please...


keel over to the winners, that is what defeatists do.
edit on 3-10-2011 by eLPresidente because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2011 @ 08:07 AM
link   
reply to post by ARealandTrueAmerican
 


He will lose not because of GOP thinking, he will lose because he has nothing to run on. He has one failed policy after another, he had two years of complete control with the house/senate. And he accomplished nothing. That is why he will lose. He has no substance to run on. Nothing to add to his resume. Only thing he can do, and has been doing, is attacking his opposers.

Get use to disappointment.




top topics



 
18
<< 10  11  12   >>

log in

join