Obama will win. As predicted. And guess who's tho blame..., page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 18 times
Topic started on 28-9-2011 @ 08:38 AM by captainnotsoobvious
It's fairly obvious that, unless something completely insane and unprecedented happens, Obama will be re-elected.

The GOP is, at this point, eating it's own candidates alive (always the threat is a primary) and so far the MOST consistently popular candidate is Mitt Romney. (Hilariously, this could be the mirror or 2004, when a struggling Democrat party choose a certain Massachusetts Senator as its candidate... remember what happened?)

A few things that should be clear at this point:

- The party refuses to align behind Ron Paul. That's not gonna change. Sorry guys.
- The party is very scared of Obama... one poor debate and they've started sticking the knife into Rick Perry... not because of his (insane) policies, but because of his performance. They think he can't win. They're right.
- The Tea Party won't have a real say in the outcome of the primaries (Bachmann is toast, Perry is floundering and the businessmen are winning...looks like we may get another CEO Presidential candidate.... just like Bush Jr.)

So, what does this all mean?

Well, look... do ANY of you think that Romney can ACTUALLY beat Obama? Really?

So, unless someone with a REAL chance (sorry Sarah) enters the field, expect a pretty definitive Obama win.

And whose to blame? The GOP of course. They allowed their ranks to be swamped with ideologues and now their party is completely divided.

Good news for those that don't like Republican "policies" (that's me) but bad news for those that like white rich guys as President.


reply posted on 28-9-2011 @ 08:43 AM by captainnotsoobvious
reply to post by beezzer



Hilarious isn't it?

He'll be back down to 10% in a few weeks...



reply posted on 28-9-2011 @ 08:47 AM by rbnhd76
I think Herman Cain could win,

if he could get equal coverage..






ETA: Beezzer beat me to it..lol

Sonnny1....yep, I do drink the "Fix the damn problems" kool-aid. it taste' good
edit on 28-9-2011 by rbnhd76 because: baaahaaahaaaaaa that my EVL....evil villain laugh



reply posted on 28-9-2011 @ 08:51 AM by beezzer
Originally posted by captainnotsoobvious
reply to
post by beezzer



Hilarious isn't it?

He'll be back down to 10% in a few weeks...


Maybe, maybe not. Only time will tell.


reply posted on 28-9-2011 @ 08:51 AM by kalisdad
Originally posted by Misterlondon
how can anyone be to "blame"? i thought the majority of voters decide who wins and becomes president... surely if the blame lies with anyone its the American public?


thats the scam of it though...

the American public doesn't decide who becomes president...

learn about electoral college before blaming the public voters

In 1824, John Quincy Adams was elected president despite not winning either the popular vote or the electoral vote. Andrew Jackson was the winner in both categories. Jackson received 38,000 more popular votes than Adams, and beat him in the electoral vote 99 to 84. Despite his victories, Jackson didn’t reach the majority 131 votes needed in the Electoral College to be declared president. In fact, neither candidate did. The decision went to the House of Representatives, which voted Adams into the White House.

In 1876, Rutherford B. Hayes won the election (by a margin of one electoral vote), but he lost the popular vote by more than 250,000 ballots to Samuel J. Tilden.

In 1888, Benjamin Harrison received 233 electoral votes to Grover Cleveland’s 168, winning the presidency. But Harrison lost the popular vote by more than 90,000 votes.

In 2000, George W. Bush was declared the winner of the general election and became the 43rd president, but he didn’t win the popular vote either. Al Gore holds that distinction, garnering about 540,000 more votes than Bush. However, Bush won the electoral vote, 271 to 266.

www.factcheck.org...
edit on 28-9-2011 by kalisdad because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 28-9-2011 @ 09:24 AM by 1AnunnakiBastard
reply to post by captainnotsoobvious



Your analysis is not taking in account the three more important details:

1)What's the Illuminati-freemasonry agenda for USA, by 2012??

2)Who's the best puppet for carry up this agenda??

3)What's his/her role for the NWO??

Do you really believe that the sheeple decides a presidential election through the vote??? Democracy is an illusion. Candidates are constructed and deconstructed according to the agenda of their overlords. TPTB are planing a complete dismantle of USA??? Turn it into a fascist nation?? Turn it into the 4th reich?? Who fits better in each scenario?? People who believe that leaders all over the world are put in the power, independently of occult forces and secret societies, are delusional.

edit on 9/28/2011 by 1AnunnakiBastard because: (no reason given)
edit on 9/28/2011 by 1AnunnakiBastard because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 28-9-2011 @ 09:28 AM by getreadyalready
reply to post by beezzer



Cain has a great shot, if he begins acting presidential right now. He has laid his 9-9-9 plan out for the world to see, and it has boosted his ratings considerably. No other candidate has a clear plan, they just have talking points and ideas. Now, if Cain will follow up that plan by laying out potential cabinet members and running mates, and a plan for Israel/Palestine, and some other clear foreign policy, then he has a shot.

Perhaps he could get some major corporations to endorse his 9-9-9 plan and publicize how it will affect their operations in the US. If it brings money home from overseas shelters, and it encourages investment in growth in the US, then people will undoubtedly support it!

Cain has a chance to seize this momentum and continue doing what is working. That means continuing to act as if he is about to become president, and lay out his agenda.

With Perry self-destructing, I think the Paul-Romney-Cain race will heat up and become a lot closer race. Romney and Cain have pesky Fed and Healthcare problems. Paul is the only clear choice at this very moment, but it is anybody's game with Perry out of the picture.


reply posted on 28-9-2011 @ 09:37 AM by antonia
Originally posted by 1AnunnakiBastard
reply to
post by captainnotsoobvious



Your analysis is not taking in account the three more important details:

1)What's the Illuminati-freemasonry agenda for USA, by 2012??

2)Who's the best puppet for carry up this agenda??

3)What's his/her role for the NWO??

Do you really believe that the sheeple decides a presidential election through the vote??? Democracy is an illusion. Candidates are constructed and deconstructed according to the agenda of their overlords. TPTB are planing a complete dismantle of USA??? Turn it into a fascist nation?? Turn it into the 4th reich?? Who fits better in each scenario?? People who believe that leaders all over the world are put in the power, independently of occult forces and secret societies, are delusional.

edit on 9/28/2011 by 1AnunnakiBastard because: (no reason given)
edit on 9/28/2011 by 1AnunnakiBastard because: (no reason given)


This, I'm not exactly sure what the game is. I still think Perry isn't finished, they will just polish him up. War is on the agenda right now.


reply posted on 28-9-2011 @ 09:38 AM by kellynap43
reply to post by captainnotsoobvious



NO president has been reelected when unemployment is 9.0% plus

That is a fact. Deal with it.


reply posted on 28-9-2011 @ 09:40 AM by kellynap43
reply to post by beezzer



I hope to God Herman Cain is elected. He is not a politician. Hes someone real. He has created and defined success. He is the american dream.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul Won (Great Read) - Huffington Post
  Posted 13 days ago with 127 member flags
Texas GOP Mutiny - SC, VA, LA and Others May Join
  Posted 15 days ago with 83 member flags
A Common Man\'s Guide to the Federal Budget.
  Posted 3 days ago with 51 member flags
*VID* Ron Paul delegates speak out from RNC.
  Posted 8 days ago with 39 member flags