posted on Sep, 27 2011 @ 12:32 AM
I can't remember all of the equations and values offhand, but I know that the orbits of the planets can be predicted from knowing the others. A
planet beyond mars was mathematically predicted and people started looking for it. What they found was the asteroid belt.
So my point is, since the planets follow this mathematical pattern, then that same mathematical pattern could be seen in other things, either
intentionally or by accident, and it wouldn't necessarily mean that these other instances of the pattern were directly related to planetary orbits.
Lastly, even if something in the Giza layout does directly relate to the inner planets, that wouldn't be that amazing. Venus and even Mercury can
both be seen with the naked eye, though Mercury is a bit tough for the casual observer.