It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ReptileRipper
Once again ..... WRONG .... he was on the 78th floor
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by ReptileRipper
reply to post by PhotonEffect
very close to free fall yes ...... i`ll say it again ... watch it and time it.
Originally posted by PhotonEffect
reply to post by anoncoholic
Borders on lunacy? Come on man.
Originally posted by anoncoholic
A C130 was seen climbing in altitude at the Pentagon and what is a C130 but a cargo carrier and why would it be climbing (unless the Pentagon were a landing/takeoff strip) if not to drop off cargo and in this case speculating it was plane parts seems more logical than all the jumbo-jets pieces turning to vapor.
What really borders on lunacy is your sense of logic if you can sit there with a straight face and suggest that the cargo plane was making an air drop of plane parts to be planted at the site. In broad daylight. With witnesses all around. None of whom reported seeing such a spectacle.
Please think about what you're saying. Please.
Originally posted by ReptileRipper
reply to post by Varemia
no , the lowest VISIBLE impacted floor , from outside of the tower, that thing burst floors open and set floors and floors on fire right ? so im guessing it wasnt easy getting up to 78 , infact didnt he have to repair 2 elevators to get up there ? correct me if im wrong on that one ( you will )
Originally posted by anoncoholic
so a jet was there?
Aside from the supposed one that hit the Pentagon that is?
.....and the only reason a C130 would climb is takeoff or cargo drop out the back door.
Face it, truth is self evident and it is the lies that people need to keep repeating. Nothing any of you have said makes a bit of sense in the overall picture and hardly explains away the facts like foreknowledge of the attack, profiteering from the attack, preparation for the attack, lies to confuse and outright blame others for the attack and last but not least, an entire community of liars to keep the lies alive and feasible rather than recognized.
You are either with us or against us and there is no middle ground on cold-blooded, calculated murder. If you believed in God you would have that morality and wouldn't need to be told.
now, address my same questions that I keep repeating in every post, why the need to lie? I know you will never answer neither will anyone else because truth can't be explained away so get off trying to justify mass murder. I can't help but wonder, how many people have you killed that you could be so cavalier over 3000 dead on that day alone?
No conscience whatsoever?
Perhaps you aren't even human but a program that is set with the standard replies and it does seem like you lot are automated just by viewing the front pages of forums when a truth gets posted and exposes your pack of lies. The typical response is to flood the front page to bury the post if the poster can't be intimidated into a pissing contest.
Guess what, I not only piss for distance I also have aim and the only thing coming from you lot is circular arguments rather than facing the evidence.
Confuse the issue with conjectures and half-truths as facts is hardly worthy of intellect when a simple fact continually is ignored.
Answer my question, why the need to lie?
Originally posted by PhotonEffect
Originally posted by anoncoholic
so a jet was there?
You betcha
Aside from the supposed one that hit the Pentagon that is?
Nope. Just the one. AA77
.....and the only reason a C130 would climb is takeoff or cargo drop out the back door.
Says who?
Face it, truth is self evident and it is the lies that people need to keep repeating. Nothing any of you have said makes a bit of sense in the overall picture and hardly explains away the facts like foreknowledge of the attack, profiteering from the attack, preparation for the attack, lies to confuse and outright blame others for the attack and last but not least, an entire community of liars to keep the lies alive and feasible rather than recognized.
You are either with us or against us and there is no middle ground on cold-blooded, calculated murder. If you believed in God you would have that morality and wouldn't need to be told.
now, address my same questions that I keep repeating in every post, why the need to lie? I know you will never answer neither will anyone else because truth can't be explained away so get off trying to justify mass murder. I can't help but wonder, how many people have you killed that you could be so cavalier over 3000 dead on that day alone?
No conscience whatsoever?
Perhaps you aren't even human but a program that is set with the standard replies and it does seem like you lot are automated just by viewing the front pages of forums when a truth gets posted and exposes your pack of lies. The typical response is to flood the front page to bury the post if the poster can't be intimidated into a pissing contest.
Guess what, I not only piss for distance I also have aim and the only thing coming from you lot is circular arguments rather than facing the evidence.
Confuse the issue with conjectures and half-truths as facts is hardly worthy of intellect when a simple fact continually is ignored.
Answer my question, why the need to lie?
Holy smokes man!!
That was some diatribe! This is a first- you managed to call me a liar, a murderer, an atheist, and a non-human all in one lucid post.
You have exposed yourself as a complete wack-adoo in my book. Man, I love ATS!edit on 18-10-2011 by PhotonEffect because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ReptileRipper
reply to post by Varemia
Haha , where the fire was hottest , it was the same fuel burning on each floor you muppet, and i said it was close to free fall , i want to see where this resistance is , because im trying and i cant see those towers stopping one floor from collapsing ..... show me ... with your amazing white arrows and one liners..... show me the resistance.
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by ReptileRipper
reply to post by Varemia
What ... you mean the debris that were blown from the top hit the ground before the rest of the tower ? "well ... slap my thigh"
And why did you even mention this resistance if your not going to back it up ... point it out , isnt this information enough to knock it all on the head ? if there was resistance theres no need for me to say it was controlled demolition.... dont you think ?
Originally posted by ReptileRipper
reply to post by Varemia
Aaaaah , so burning plastic and air preassure , blows massive steel structures into DUST dude , get a grip.
And yes... i know what im saying .... yes ... youd need some grade A explosives to do that wouldnt you ? shock horror
I`m guessing you beleive the squibs were air blowing out of the buildings too right ? , if so , can you explain why theyre not coming out of every window on each floor ? and why they were isolated squibs , not big old dust clouds blowing out of 5 - 6 windows at a time ? let me guess .... most of the doors were closed
And the distance those chunks of debri were travelling ... were talking like 500 - 600 feet .... plastic , carpets and air preassure c`mon what`s next ? chuck norris punched the foundations ?
edit on 18-10-2011 by ReptileRipper because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by anoncoholic
and that is how liars answer. Rather than confront the evidence you choose to make it all about me whereas I am stating facts. If the shoe fits...
The question still goes unanswered, why the need to lie if there was any veracity to the claim?
Holy smokes man!!
That was some diatribe! This is a first- you managed to call me a liar, a murderer, an atheist, and a non-human all in one lucid post.
You have exposed yourself as a complete wack-adoo in my book. Man, I love ATS! :up
Originally posted by PhotonEffect
Originally posted by anoncoholic
and that is how liars answer. Rather than confront the evidence you choose to make it all about me whereas I am stating facts. If the shoe fits...
The question still goes unanswered, why the need to lie if there was any veracity to the claim?
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about.
I haven't lied about anything.
And what evidence am I dodging? If you're talking about the C-130 witnesses claim to have seen supposedly increasing altitude after the crash, then I really don't know what more you want from me. I've addressed it...
You seem to think it's because it was making a drop off of plane parts. And I tend to think that is absolutely absurd and unworthy of any more of my time and consideration.
Google Video Link |