It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ReptileRipper
reply to post by Varemia
no..... first flash - right hand side , happens right before the *topple* , work on yours , use that video to work on yours, keep looping it , youll see LOTS of charges going off , up and down both sides of the tower. and theyre going off behind the smoke demolishing the *toppling* top.
Why tapdance around it , its there, its scary to think of at first , but when you accept it , and everyone else does, THEN we can get justice for what happened.
Originally posted by ReptileRipper
who said theyre not worth listening to ? i havnt seen any of them say anything along the lines of " i knew it would come down because the tower lost its structural integraty on impact" .. then proceeded to explain how and why they thought that ..... i`d listen to them, i`d look into it .....
But what is truly amazing is these kids who sit there waffling on about how burning carpets and plastic can melt steel.
this whole OS was already made up weeks if not months before 911 , so it wouldnt be hard to radio all feet on ground and say , the towers leaning
Originally posted by ReptileRipper
reply to post by TrickoftheShade
Varemia thinks so ...... burning carpets and paper brought down the towers
Originally posted by Varemia
Edit: You can't ignore the truth forever.edit on 18-10-2011 by Varemia because: (no reason given)
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by anoncoholic
that a tower that is beginning to lean will stop its lean and instead correct its falling nature contrary to all known physics?
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Originally posted by anoncoholic
that a tower that is beginning to lean will stop its lean and instead correct its falling nature contrary to all known physics?
Just as a matter of interest, how do the bombs correct the falling of the tower and stop it from continuing on its "leaning" trajectory?