Lets continue the dis-info agents elsewhere then..
Do you agree we can now call 2012 the 'unproven hypothesis' from now on? Following your own logic it is now irresponsible to call 2012 a mere hoax.
Whether or not the original source for the hypothesis was Mayan prophecies is irrelevant, facts do back up that we have had many mass extinctions that
Yes you are right.. So many names TYCHE, NEMESIS, WORMWOOD, ELENIN, PLANET X, YU55, C2010 X1, Marduk, Nemesis, Hercolubus, the Gods Planet, the Planet
of the Empire, the Planet of the Cross or the Red Planet. Total about 32 names all very useful for helping the confusion.
I have a 3rd nipple which I use to communicate to Gandhi..
this is a hoax.
Gandhi is of course dead.
Those amateur astronomers would have detected it by now? Yes they have.
Now answer this, can you think of one logical reason why Google sky et al would block out a chunk of the sky? and move that blocked area as though it
were disguising a moving object.
In the context that we have agreed a dangerous event would be hidden, then how would they hide it?
1) Block out Google sky et al.
2) Create confusion around the event. Swapping names, I believe they will have a different name for different stages of the operation.
3) Release information to overtake Google search rankings on key terms such as 'Two suns'
4) Use the fall of satellites to desensitize the public to objects falling from the sky. Furthermore to create doom fatique.
5) Massage public anxiety by having a conference on NEO's shortly before the danger period. Note: Watch NASA previous conferences from the last 10
years and you will see that the behaviour of the panel is odd!