It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I believe government should protect from outside aggression.
Originally posted by jimnuggits
Tell, in your own words, your political stance.
I believe that the government must protect citizens from outside aggression, environmental devastation, and provide a level playing field for all its citizens, including food, shelter and a good education until such time as every member of our democracy can contribute to the greater good.
Originally posted by jimnuggits
reply to post by beezzer
No interstate highways, national parks, federal disaster relief, or national certification for university accreditation?
What about food safety, and...
Originally posted by Partygirl
Sounds good to me, no objections, although I'd like to see the fine print on what exactly constitutes a "level playing field." I have a feeling there is room for disagreement within that broad and noble sentiment.
Originally posted by jimnuggits
reply to post by beezzer
No interstate highways, national parks, federal disaster relief, or national certification for university accreditation?
What about food safety, and...
Minus that stuff, I can't think of many other good attributes.
Interesting!
Originally posted by jimnuggits
reply to post by beezzer
As a teacher, no department of education makes me very nervous.
Could you make a case for it?
No standards?
What would be considered a 'good education' then?
Originally posted by Misoir
reply to post by illuminatislave
It would be absolutely stupid for them to refuse aid. Not because of some political leaning of theirs but rather for the fact that they pay taxes for those services… and taxes are not voluntary. Yeah I pay taxes, although I think they are far too excessive and government does way too much, so should I pay my taxes then shut up if anything happens to me? The money I was forced by law to pay in taxes could have been better kept in an account designed specifically for such a situation.
Originally posted by Misoir
reply to post by illuminatislave
I do not believe in a level playing field or equality. There is only liberty. If a kid is born into a family of millionaires who can afford a top notch education then that kid receives top notch education. If a kid is born into a family of desperately poor who can only afford public education then that kid should receive public education. Typically the kid in the wealthy family has a higher chance of success so why restrict those parents from providing their kid with the tools of success? We cannot go around and tell kids that when they come in last place in a foot race that they did just as good as the kid who won.
Some are born with privilege others are not. If you are born without privilege then your climb to the top is just that much more inspiring and self-fulfilling.