It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Freefall collapse.. without explosives?

page: 3
0
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 26 2011 @ 06:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Insolubrious
Anok - to answer your question I believe the majority of south face would be buried underneath the rubble pile in southern collapse. But really when you look at this pile, there's really not much left that's recognisable.


What is recognizable is that the majority of the rubble is centered in the footprint of the building, it is not biased in any one direction.

What is recognizable is that there are outer walls that are also not biased in one direction, but are evenly spread around the footprint of the building.

As far as the building leaning during collapse, again from the evidence it is more likely what you think is the building leaning is not the whole building leaning in that direction, but simply the side you see, the other side of the building is also falling inwards, because that is what the post collapse rubble pile shows. You can tell if you study the walls that they came from all four sides. What you see is not the whole height of the walls btw, as part of them are in the rubble pile, and what you have is just the top most parts.

Go back to your WTC 6 vid and ask yourself why that building didn't collapse into a neat pile, but simply left a burned out shell, as most normal buildings do from fire.

This was WTC 7...



Now imagine that leaning to one side when it collapsed, and then look at the post collapse pics.

It didn't lean anywhere, except in on itself...









posted on Sep, 26 2011 @ 06:11 PM
link   
It was not a cover up, the ones who they say did it, did it. But there is more to the story.



new topics
 
0
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join