The first one - the head I believe
if an original and not a reproduction
would be pre columbian. I am trying
to remember exactly what they are
called and I can't. They would throw
them into the corn fields for a good
crop. I have had an original before
but they really aren't worth that much
since there are so many of them still
out there. Maybe $45 - $75. The
other objects I am not familiar with.

Don't take my word for what info I
gave as I have been out of the antique
and antiquity business for a while now.
Its to give you an idea of what to research.

Corn God keeps coming to mind.

Interesting - thank you for sharing your
treasures.

El Da Sensai and Tame one.

They reunited this year, axctually.

The figurine head looks vaguely Egyptian, but the rocks look like petrified clay with holes caused by worms or other underwater animals. Being their exit-breathing holes. It was covered in silt or other material that also filled the holes then later eroded away from the original, now hardened rock, being a less substantial mineral/material. I've seen old riverbed, and lake-beach material like this.

That's my guess anyway.

ZG

There's a reason archaeologists, when photographing artifacts, try to insert a ruler alongside them. Scale is very important; I could be looking at the edges of a ceramic container's handles, or a full on bust.

As well, multiple angles, preferably from all sides and edges, even from those that might not look as "interesting," would be of great help.

If it's from the Americas, I'd say it's Olmec. If it's not, or more modern, then it could be from places as varied as modern China to Mesopotamia. An in-depth description might narrow things down considerably, as well as the aforementioned pictures.

Best of luck.

It's red clay pottery somewhat vaguely in the style of the Aztec -- however, it lacks some of the stylized elements, which makes me think (along with the lack of wear on the object) that it is probably less than 200 years old.

I think it's a good guess that it might be one of the "garden gods."

It's certainly not Mayan or Olmec -- wrong style face. It's an attractive piece and it's a shame there's no documentation with it.

I am from the US, thanks for all the great insights and replies, these were found from an unclaimed box auctioned off in New mexico, would that be of any help?

Thanks once again for the great replies, look for even more

From the latest response, I reckon it is a Teotihuacan head fragment. Thanks a bunch everyone, those porous pottery is still leaving me thinking.... hmmmm