posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 10:51 PM
Originally posted by XtraTL
How is it that simple logic fails to prevail in every single thread on ATS related to cancer?
It's a virus which occurs in 80% of humans and it cures breast cancer does it? Isn't that quite obviously an illogical and stupid thing to
Isn't it quite obvious and logical that people with breast cancer get this virus all the time. Like a large percentage of them? And it clearly
doesn't cure their breast cancer!
And how is it that ignorance prevails in every single thread on ATS related to cancer?
Killing cancer in vitro is *easy*. Real damned easy. There are lots of chemicals, viruses and treatments which do it.
The reason you keep hearing about "cancer cures" that disappear all the time is not because "big pharma" is supressing them. It's because they
aren't cancer cures. Please learn what "cancer cure" means and how it differs from killing cancer cells in vitro.
Why does this sort of thing get repeated over and over and over on ATS and yet no one listens!?
Did you know cyanide kills cancer cells in vitro. And bleach. And TNT. And extremely high temperatures. And UV. And high doses of gamma rays. And
If there's anything that's going to be suppressed in this thread, it's your post. But not through evil intentions, rather sheer willful ignorance
and intellectual laziness. It's amazing how many people don't bother to read the actual paper.
Like the good man I'm quoting stated, it is an in-vitro study, nothing to get worked up over. It has the potential to lead to something great but on
its own, it's not a cancer cure, not even close to one. Also by itself, it doesn't cure cancer, as more people should have noticed. The test is
going to be isolating the processes in which this virus induces apoptosis in cancer cells and not normal cells, AND THEN finding out if we can get it
to work in non in-vitro *peer-reviewed* studies. THEN we can get overly worked up, and begin the paranoia of how "Big-Pharma is suppressing this."