Originally posted by Essan
reply to post by sacgamer25
My assumption is that you have made up your mind and will dismiss any evidence or argument that does not support your preconceived dogma (the
antithesis of science) - including for example DNA, RNA, fossil record and radiometric dating. And I bet my assumption isn't far off the mark.
You say it is a false assumption to claim dinosaurs did not live alongside man. I say according to the geological record dinosaurs largely became
extinct 65,000,000 years ago and that the earliest homonids that might be called human did not appear until around 2,000,000 years ago.
No fossils of any form of homonid have ever been found in the same strata as that in which dinosaur bones have been found, and vice versa.
Why then do you assume that humans did live alongside dinosaurs? And do you think humans lived alongside cynodonts as well? edit on
24-9-2011 by Essan because: (no reason given)
As long as I can provide scientific evidence that the things you assume as facts are indeed assumptions then I refuse to believe the assumption.
Dinos and man: 65 million years assumes the accuracy of dating and the accuracy of strata. I gave a link for dating here is one for strata.
www.youtube.com...
Hominid and dinosaur fossils: That is simple would you have been hanging out with the dinosaurs? If strata data is wrong, which science suggest it
could be, see you tube video above, then it cannot be stated as fact. Also i assume the flood whipped out the majority of dinosaurs. I imagine man
migrating to higher ground until all ground was covered, the bodies would have floated once water overtook the higher ground and they would have
complete decomposed in the water, leaving no fossil record. This theory would be consistent with the small amount of fossil evidence we have.
Here is a good link that explains fossil record and draws a conclusion on why we don't find dino and hominoid fossils together.
www.answersingenesis.org...
edit on 24-9-2011 by sacgamer25 because: spelling
