It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why does every bit of evidence for evolution prove evolution when every bit of evidence for creationsim proves nothing? Who makes the decision about what evidence proves evolution vs creationism?
edit on 24-9-2011 by sacgamer25 because: (no reason given)edit on 24-9-2011 by sacgamer25 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sacgamer25
reply to post by Atzil321
How can an atheist, who's number 1 goal is to prove God is not real, be objective. Every bit of evidence makes him believe he has proven something that in fact is unproven. This is not science or intelligence. Most of the claims that he makes about natural occurrences can also be argued prove intelligent design. If something can be argued by both sides of the argument without either side being able to prove the argument than neither side has a right to claim ownership of said argument. However evolutionist do this every day.
Originally posted by lewman
The world was created 1844 years ago by a space lion with one eye when he went for a crap.
Now try and give me proof that genesis was more accurate than my little theory.
Who makes the decision about what evidence proves evolution vs creationism?
Originally posted by steveknows
Originally posted by lewman
The world was created 1844 years ago by a space lion with one eye when he went for a crap.
Now try and give me proof that genesis was more accurate than my little theory.
The bible has fantasy drawings, you need fantasy drawings or what you say isn't true. not diagrams or photos showing the microscopic world because that's not good enough. If you don't have fantasy drawings what you say isn't true.
Originally posted by sacgamer25
Why does every bit of evidence for evolution prove evolution when every bit of evidence for creationsim proves nothing? Who makes the decision about what evidence proves evolution vs creationism?
edit on 24-9-2011 by sacgamer25 because: (no reason given)edit on 24-9-2011 by sacgamer25 because: (no reason given)
How can an atheist, who's number 1 goal is to prove God is not real, be objective.
If something can be argued by both sides of the argument without either side being able to prove the argument than neither side has a right to claim ownership of said argument.
Originally posted by DaveNorris
reply to post by steveknows
i already asked that question, no doubt you will be pointed in the direction of the closest bible