It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

First video of Satellite UARS debris falling over Okotoks,Canada AMAZING VIDEO!

page: 3
31
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:07 AM
link   
Don't think ash would explain it. That user just doesn't seem to understand that we have 0 way of knowing the actual speed from this video. We know the objects are really really far away as we cant see any streaking. That alone makes it impossible to say what speed they travel.




posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:10 AM
link   
But wait! It re-entered over Australia!
www.youtube.com...



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:11 AM
link   
skip to 3:50



I couldn't find the orig video used in this but I found one close. I'll eventually find the video used in this, I'm tired and need some sleep.

Notice the similarities.



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:13 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


That's MIR



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:14 AM
link   
reply to post by litterbaux
 

But at least it is a satellite.



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:15 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


I thought it was Italy!




posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:15 AM
link   
reply to post by litterbaux
 


That's not the same video. Not even close.



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:16 AM
link   
So the whole thing is a cover up for massive UFO landings



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:17 AM
link   
reply to post by PsykoOps
 


I stated its not the same video. The strange lights in the sky act the same way at the 3:50 min mark.

There were no satellites falling that day, explain the similarity.



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:18 AM
link   
Debris recovered



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:19 AM
link   
reply to post by litterbaux
 


Explain what similarity? The one you perceive in your head? I can't explain that. Look at the mirror.



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:19 AM
link   
reply to post by bluemooone2
 


Isn't this the first video however?
It is included in this thread by Semoro www.stuff.co.nz...
Uars satellite crashes back to earth
www.abovetopsecret.com...



There were reports on Twitter of debris falling over Okotoks, a town south of Calgary in western Canada, most

edit on 24-9-2011 by newcovenant because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
Debris recovered


While watching that video, the only thought in my head was how funny it'd be if this guys hair caught on fire..



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:23 AM
link   

Update #15
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:46:42 PM GMT-1000

NASA’s decommissioned Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite fell back to Earth between 11:23 p.m. EDT Friday, Sept. 23 and 1:09 a.m. EDT Sept. 24. The Joint Space Operations Center at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California said the satellite penetrated the atmosphere over the Pacific Ocean. The precise re-entry time and location are not yet known with certainty.

www.nasa.gov...

Okotoks is 500 miles from the Pacific coast.



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by TheDon
reply to post by bluemooone2
 


At the 2.32 mark he makes a reference to the date being sept 22nd,


NASA’s decommissioned Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite fell back to Earth between 11:23 p.m. EDT Friday, Sept. 23 and 1:09 a.m. EDT Sept. 24. The satellite was passing eastward over Canada and Africa as well as vast portions of the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian oceans during that period. The precise re-entry time and location are not yet known with certainty.


Source

Which was posted at Sat, 24 Sep 2011 09:16:50 AM GMT+0200

So I can not see how that can be UARS.


I noticed that too when I first watched it, but I wonder if maybe he just got confused on the date during his excitement... I do that all the time in my old age.



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:25 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 



So? How you going to say the distance from the video?
edit on 24/9/2011 by PsykoOps because: (no reason given)


Also


The precise re-entry time and location are not yet known with certainty.

edit on 24/9/2011 by PsykoOps because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by litterbaux
 


Explain what similarity? The one you perceive in your head? I can't explain that. Look at the mirror.


Are you really gonna make me overlay the two video's....

To show the similarity in the "lights" movement....

Then upload to a fake youtube account....

Just to prove to you that its an old video thats being faked as current events?

Here I'll save both of us some time. Watch the video again, notice the pixelation. What causes that? Over production/over rendering. This is a very poor video by a person that absolutely sucks at video rendering. I'll bet its a 10 year old kid.

I really wish I had more time tonight because I could make a much better video in 1080p with great audio and you guys could think im God for catching it




posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:28 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


No wonder the thing lost orbit and crashed, I guess even NASA had to cut back and use cardboard for their sattelite program. At that rate maybe we should invest in cardboard manufacturing.



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by Phage

Update #15
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:46:42 PM GMT-1000

NASA’s decommissioned Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite fell back to Earth between 11:23 p.m. EDT Friday, Sept. 23 and 1:09 a.m. EDT Sept. 24. The Joint Space Operations Center at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California said the satellite penetrated the atmosphere over the Pacific Ocean. The precise re-entry time and location are not yet known with certainty.

www.nasa.gov...

Okotoks is 500 miles from the Pacific coast.


Thats total bull sheite.

Everyone with sat capability knows when it came down and could run projections even though it was tumbling. I detect something stuck on someones shoe and it stinks.



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by Versa
The lights don't look like they're moving to me. I think its just street/house lights on a hill. IMO that's not the UARS.

ETA

Comments have just been disabled for the video so imo its a hoax
edit on 24/9/11 by Versa because: (no reason given)


Ho i guess it was not a bad thing for me to still look out after your iffy comment then

hope you do not need a second line




top topics



 
31
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join