It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hawkiye
Glad you think you have it all figured out... however atoms don't burn sugar. Breathing and eating is just gathering more perpetual motion machines (atoms) to the form.
Look it up where in your science text book? It is most often those who think they understand physics so well who understand it the least stuck in thier little box of orthodoxy. That is why we are still using 150 year old technology for transportation...
But like I said I am just some guy in the internet so what do I know...
Originally posted by jonnywhite
People should not think of perpetual motion machines that do work when they think about producing energy.
Another thing is that energy cannot be created or destroyed, just changed.
We keep thinking that perpetual motion machines that produce energy will answer our problems. But the mistake is assuming that non-perpetual energy producers AREN'T ALREADY answering problems!! We DO NOT need free energy to solve problems!! ]
Make energy that produces work free and you change the game.
Because the oil companies say so.
The patent office will not allow patents on perpetual motion machines as they break the first law of thermodynamics. This states that energy can be changed from one form to another, but cannot be created or destroyed.
The machine, largely created out of leftover bicycle parts and a windscreen-washer motor uses high-powered magnets and a series of flywheels to apparently create energy from gravity.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by boncho
The problem is our centralized electrical distribution system. In that regard, you are correct. However if a source of "free energy" were developed, the centralized model would no longer make sense. A decentralized model would be much better imo. Each home could have it's own mini power generation station. Whether it be solar, or wind, or hydro, fuel cells, or something else like the OP is discussing. Think of the revolution that would result.
Sorry... what are you talking about? You are not making any sense.
At least bother to understand the science you are so quick to dismiss, you look less ignorant that way
Notice the correlation between scientific illiteracy and blind belief in all this perpetual/over unity nonsense?
That's true.
Originally posted by boncho
The solar system is not a perpetual motion machine.
Perpetual motion describes hypothetical machines that operate or produce useful work indefinitely and, more generally, hypothetical machines that produce more work or energy than they consume
Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by hawkiye
The solar system is not a perpetual motion machine.
reply to post by Arbitrageur
The solar system can't produce useful work indefinitely. Maybe for a long time, but not indefinitely.
And your evidence for that is???
Originally posted by jude11
This is the Holy Grail of energy and scientists/Engineers have been trying to create perpetual motion for...well, forever.
Glad you think you have it all figured out... however atoms don't burn sugar. Breathing and eating is just gathering more perpetual motion machines (atoms) to the form.