It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Originally posted by Domo1
A small-town judge in Alabama is giving non-violent offenders a choice at sentencing: go to jail or go to church. Under a program dubbed "Operation Restore Our Community," the city judge in Bay Minette lets misdemeanor offenders serve time and pay a fine or go to church every Sunday for a year, according to WKRG.com. If offenders choose church, they can pick the place of worship as long as they check in weekly with the pastor and police. After a year of Sundays in the pew, the offender's case will be dismissed.
I've got real mixed feelings on this. I don't think that the State should be making or encouraging people to go to church. Granted, you get to pick the church and it saves a TON of money but something about this just feels wrong. What about the Atheist or Agnostic or...? I suppose I could support this measure if community service or something along those lines were also implemented. There's no sense in locking someone up if they don't pose a danger in my opinion. We waste far too much money incarcerating people that really don't need to be in jail.
What do you guys think? Fair enough or should there be some changes?
Link
Jesus Christ is exactly what these men need. He alone can free them of their desires to commit crimes and make them better people in the process while he saves their souls all at the same time. Theres too much godlessness in the world and thats the problem.
Originally posted by queenofsheba
reply to post by Annee
You turned it into a question by the "aren't you." But then again, you can state your opinion...fine by me. Where's my scotch?? Why does everyone drink scotch around here? I've heard that often of ATSer's.
Originally posted by AnneeQuit acting like this was an attack.
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by The Old American
False dichotomy. The issue here is not the existence of alternative punishments for non-violent offenders, but whether they should include attending religious institutions.
Originally posted by The Old American
Screw it. Put them in jail. Waste more taxpayer money because we can't have non-violent offenders anywhere but jail. Separation of church and state PERIOD, no ifs, ands, or buts!
Completely throw out the part where a judge, in today's fascist America, is willing to not put someone in jail for a minor offense. A judge advocating for no jail time. He gives a criminal an actual choice as to the punishment he receives? Where else in America is this happening? Was that nowhere? I thought so.
You people with a grudge against God really need to grow the freak up, get over yourselves, and think about, for just once in your lives, the needs of the many. How many non-violent offenders, people that smoked one joint, a kid that stole a radio, are languishing in jail right now at millions of dollars of taxpayer cost? This is a WIN for taxpayers and for people that don't need to be in prison with real criminals!
/TOA
Originally posted by buster2010
Originally posted by The Old American
Screw it. Put them in jail. Waste more taxpayer money because we can't have non-violent offenders anywhere but jail. Separation of church and state PERIOD, no ifs, ands, or buts!
Completely throw out the part where a judge, in today's fascist America, is willing to not put someone in jail for a minor offense. A judge advocating for no jail time. He gives a criminal an actual choice as to the punishment he receives? Where else in America is this happening? Was that nowhere? I thought so.
You people with a grudge against God really need to grow the freak up, get over yourselves, and think about, for just once in your lives, the needs of the many. How many non-violent offenders, people that smoked one joint, a kid that stole a radio, are languishing in jail right now at millions of dollars of taxpayer cost? This is a WIN for taxpayers and for people that don't need to be in prison with real criminals!
/TOA
Nice to see you don't support the separation of church and state. Why didn't he have them go through a rehab program and do community service? At least that way they would be doing some good in the community in which they broke the law. If this judge is allowing to let his religious views to influence his verdicts then he chose the wrong line of work.
The issue here is that a judge is giving a criminal a choice to go to jail or not.
Originally posted by Annee
How about this judge contact some Atheist groups in the area - - - and see if they have any programs or recommendations.
Atheists are becoming more socially involved. I would bet non-religious programs are also available.
Originally posted by CynicalDrivel
And do you get why I'd like you to cut it out? Or do we need a 8-10th round of the same freaking conversation over and over? Especially if even before this time I stated that I agreed with your statement, and that what I reposted in response had nothing to do with you parroting this over and over?
I guess I'll be taking a trip to the penitentiary, If I go to church somebody will be getting hurt and that is a guarantee. I can't take no sanctimonious people in a church.
Originally posted by Annee
The problem is not that the judge offered church as an alternative.
The problem is he offered only church as an alternative.