Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Fox News Pulls Poll Showing Ron Paul Debate Victory, Claims Mitt Romney Won

page: 2
20
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 23 2011 @ 06:31 PM
link   
i would just like to add my 2 cents too all those saying ron paul supporters flock to his online polls.
i know about 50 people, including myself who are definitely for ron paul. and i also know for a
certainty that not one of us has voted in any online poll. so he has more followers than is showing and also not all his supporters are flooding the stupid, meaningless polls. just an fyi.

i'll save my vote for the day it counts, and i know many others who are doing the same.




posted on Sep, 23 2011 @ 06:39 PM
link   
People act like Ron Paul supporters are the only ones who use the Internet. News flash, everyone uses the Internet. Also, I don't need a poll or a news caster tell me who I should vote for. All I have to do is see what each candidate voted for and what they believe in to make my decision.

I can tell you one thing, I wont vote for RomneyCARE or MERK PerrySIL. If you want to lose more of your fleeting freedom, by all means bury your head in the sand and vote one of those fascists in.

The only real people I see on that stage are Ron Paul and Herman Cain. The only two people who make freaking sense to me. The others are full of hot air.
edit on 23-9-2011 by BIGPoJo because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2011 @ 07:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by Carseller4
anti-war kooks, and pot heads.

I don't like war and would smoke pot if it were legal. If I didn't think the position of president is figurehead, I still wouldn't want Paul in charge. I'm too socialistic.



posted on Sep, 23 2011 @ 11:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Carseller4
 


Seriously??You must be from Texas.Only a commie doesn't like Ron Paul or talks # about him.You must be a used car salesman because anyone who HAS a soul wouldn't be doing what your doing to him.



posted on Sep, 23 2011 @ 11:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by gwydionblack
reply to post by Carseller4
 


Yes I'm sure all the Straw Polls he won as well are simply shams and chain emails.


People on ATS actually think online polls and straw polls are legit indicators of anything? Online polls are quite simply that and anyone with half a brain sees the flaws. Straw polls are won and lost by the candidate themselves buying the votes. Neither is a legit indicator of anything. Then again, I could be wrong and Paul won the election in a landslide in 2008?
No?



posted on Sep, 23 2011 @ 11:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by letscit
i would just like to add my 2 cents too all those saying ron paul supporters flock to his online polls.
i know about 50 people, including myself who are definitely for ron paul. and i also know for a
certainty that not one of us has voted in any online poll. so he has more followers than is showing and also not all his supporters are flooding the stupid, meaningless polls. just an fyi.

i'll save my vote for the day it counts, and i know many others who are doing the same.


Did you really ask all 50?
Are you sure they were honest?
Sorry, but I had to ask because of how funny it is that anyone can write a post claiming that they represent 0.000162862975% of the US population and yet speak for some kind of majority.

You do realize that there is a Mitt Romney fan somewhere saying that he and 100 of his friends did not vote too, right? Guess now it is about who has the most non-voters?


Paul fans, it is a big big world out there you know. How many of your grandparents took part in that online poll?



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 12:18 AM
link   
Ron Paul's got more fans and haters (The people that say the polls only matter when Pauls not on top) than a rap star this election is in the bag remember the saying "haters promote me"
.



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 12:23 AM
link   
Just like to add I demand a manual recount of actual votes after they rig the election. Wonder how many ballots will vanish under misterious circumstances?



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 12:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by FallenWun

Originally posted by gwydionblack
reply to post by Carseller4
 


Yes I'm sure all the Straw Polls he won as well are simply shams and chain emails.


People on ATS actually think online polls and straw polls are legit indicators of anything? Online polls are quite simply that and anyone with half a brain sees the flaws. Straw polls are won and lost by the candidate themselves buying the votes. Neither is a legit indicator of anything. Then again, I could be wrong and Paul won the election in a landslide in 2008?
No?


/sarcasm
no he came in a close second to hillary but when they went back in time to fix the prob (being that hil won and destroyed the future) They knew that rp won after her first term so they skiped him in hopes of not causing too much change to the time line. Thankfully it was all wright in votes so not many knoticed.
/sarcasm

now back to the real world
Did you not hear about all of the voter fraud that took place in 08 and the messed up voting machines? Its not likely that anyone can tell you 100% without a doubt who won in 08.



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 02:06 AM
link   
I say let's get Christie into the race. That will shake things up. Besides, anyone as fat as him can surely fatten up the rest of us.


Nope, no one in the MSM will allow Ron Paul become a threat to the status quo. It's just not going to happen.



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 03:19 AM
link   
reply to post by BIGPoJo
 


Wow you took the words out of my mouth. I mean really they do make the most sense i'm starting to like Mr. Cain a bit but Ron Paul is who i'm rooting for. Also i don't know if anyone caught this at the end of the debate as the camera pans out it looks as if Dr. Paul is in a FOX news persons face. Then you don't see him any where after that when they show them greeting the crowd with their wives you don't see him maybe they didn't show him or he was pissed at something or someone and just left.
edit on 24-9-2011 by Godhood because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 08:37 AM
link   
With people like you defining what we should believe in your just as bad as anything in office. Cock


i]reply to post by Carseller4
 



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 09:04 AM
link   
reply to post by schuyler
 


No they just do what they are told. Get in line, vote for the one that has a chance against BO, you know the classic oiled back hair Politician. Ron Paul has not waivered or his beliefs since he started 20 yrs ago. Romney can't make one debate without waffling, Golden boy Perry cannot debate easy gop, so how can he debate BO?
So who is electible? Really? It is Ron Paul, he talks to both sides Dems and Reps. Dems like drugs and hate war, Reps like less taxes and fiscal responsibility. Most of the canidates have adapted several of Ron Paul's stances, and claiming them for themselves. The problem is they have no intention of implementation of said programs ( Audit the Fed, fair tax, etc...). So drink your kool aid and follow the sheep in front of you.
They are (msm) is defeating Ron Paul by mentally convincing people he does not have a chance. I listened to most of the reports yesturday to see if they mentioned the poll at all. Fox came out with talking head after talking head saying electibility. They asked over and over Who do you think is the most electible? Ron Paul scares TPTB and I like that alot. O'rielly calls him everything from and idiot to unelectible. Fair and Balanced I don't think so. The only way to repond to Mr O is to become a "premium subscriber". what a hoax!!!!!!!!! That way they can weed out the unwanteds. ust my 2 cents worth. I am tired of people putting down Ron Paul when he makes more sense than any other candidate, and has fought for his beliefs even before they were popular. He is the only difference. Between reps and dems there is no differences like they claim. Look at their stances, look at washington, if we keep saying that people who could make a difference are unelectible, then a difference will never be made. We have to make a difference this country cannot sustain more of the same. It just can't!!!!!!!



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 10:16 AM
link   
reply to post by Carseller4
 



Another one of these? Really?

Once again, it would be news if Ron Paul didn't win an online poll. It's what he does. It's also why it doesn't get reported on. Everyone knows it's a sham. Thousands of Ron Paul fans sitting back forwarding emails letting other of the latest polls they need to spam. Great organization, but it doesn't translate into results when it comes to State Primaries.


Ah, Carseller. He's so dedicated isn't he? What a guy. Never misses an opportunity to "cheer" us on. In fact he is so punctual about it you would "almost" think it was his career. He always shows up early, is always positive, and always quick to man the State Primary drum for us so that we can march forward unhindered. Truly one of the unsung heroes of the Ron Paul movement.

From the bottom of our hearts Carseller, thanks for being there for us. You the man!

You know, come to think of it, of all the cars I have ever bought I have never bought one from a car salesman, nor have I ever been friends with one. Obviously, I will have to correct this situation.

Pardon me, suddenly I am feeling a little vomitous...

Ron Paul 2012



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 10:19 AM
link   
The only GOP candidate that has any hope is Romney.

Please note: IMHO.
edit on 24-9-2011 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 10:21 AM
link   
Ron Paul can beat them at their own game when the cards are stacked against him, that shows just how powerful a contender he is. If he got a 1/10th of the coverage that the Perry/Romney feud-fest gets he would win in a landslide. As much as I enjoy Ron Paul speaking for longer periods of time to a warmer audience, I kind of like seeing him under the gun and only needing to answer in 30 seconds or so to a slanted question, and he still knocks it out of the park. In a way I'm happy the media is ignoring him, it would leave a bitter taste in my mouth if I had to admit that fox news was supporting Ron Paul. Let the establishment shun him, it just shows he is of a different caliber, a better caliber.



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 10:24 AM
link   
reply to post by gwydionblack
 



Yes I'm sure all the Straw Polls he won as well are simply shams and chain emails.


You didn't get the email with the "Super Secret Ron Paul Straw Poll Hacking Software" (SSRPSPHS for short
)?

Might check in your Spam folder, might have gone there by accident. If not send me a U2U and I will forward you your copy. But don't tell anybody...

Oh, damn! I blew it, I let the cat out of the bag...

Oh, wait, I haven't posted this yet. Whew! So which button will let me abort this post? Ah yes "Reply". that's it...



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 10:32 AM
link   
reply to post by FallenWun
 



Paul fans, it is a big big world out there you know. How many of your grandparents took part in that online poll?


My Grandparents are dead so I don't think they did vote, does this help prove your point? I can't tell as I am not sure what your point is.

Mom is 88 and refuses to learn how to use a computer, but she always votes Republican, except for the Kennedy election. She was all for Ron Paul until she heard she might lose her Medicaid. The other day when Ron Stated that he would not be pulling any medical rugs out from under any Seniors, she decided he would be okay.

We have talked about Ron Paul, but Mom makes up her own mind, always has. I hope this helps ya', probably would be more helpful if I knew what you were driving at with the above post.
edit on 24-9-2011 by Ittabena because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 10:36 AM
link   
reply to post by jonnywhite
 



The only GOP candidate that has any hope is Romney.


Perhaps... Let's work with that theory. If Romney is the only candidate that has any hope, how much does that leave for us?

You guys love to talk about "Ron doesn't have a chance", but never do y'all discuss one issue. Do ya know any? Or is that not in the "Troll job description"?



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 10:40 AM
link   
Half of what Ron Paul says makes sense and I am with him 100%, the other half of what he says wants me to never see him as President of our country....


I think he would be great in positions that he could focus change in..like the Fed Res, wouldn't that be interesting if he was put in charge of that, but as President.. I shudder to think....
edit on 24-9-2011 by Xtrozero because: (no reason given)






top topics



 
20
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join