It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Chief of CIA's 'Global Jihad Unit' Revealed Online

page: 1
7

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 23 2011 @ 12:28 AM
link   

Chief of CIA's 'Global Jihad Unit' Revealed Online


gawker.com

By John

The CIA is having trouble keeping its secret agents off the internet. First, it allowed the White House to publish a photograph of the man behind the operation to kill Osama bin Laden. And now the identity of the woman who runs its "Global Jihad Unit"—and who has a long (if pseudonymous) history of being associated with some of the agency's most disastrous boondoggles—has been published online by two documentary filmmakers who sussed it out with the help of some "savvy internet research
(visit the link for the full news article)




posted on Sep, 23 2011 @ 12:28 AM
link   
Despite the CIA's attempt to intimidate the producers of 9/11 Press for Truth.They found the names of two desk officers that had much to do with the failures leading up to 9/11.Alfreda Bikowsky who now heads up the Global Jihad office and is a close adviser for President Obama.The other Michael Anne Casey decided not to share info about Khalid al-Mihdhar one of the supposed hijackers on flight 77 who had a US visa with the White House and the FBI.Now,Richard Clarke has a theory that the CIA sat on this in hopes of turning one of the hijackers into informants for them when that did not pan out they let them go.In my view these 2 desk officers were acting like moles,perhaps it was just the age old FBI/CIA rivalry or they were following orders that led to the CIA allowing 9/11 to happen.


gawker.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on Sep, 23 2011 @ 12:59 AM
link   
Did a quick background check and she seems to have ties to Silverstein, family even.



posted on Sep, 23 2011 @ 01:00 AM
link   
Global jihad? is that code for alCIAda? Sure seems so.



posted on Sep, 23 2011 @ 01:18 AM
link   
The CIA sure isn't what it used to be. The things it could do in the hay day of the 1960's power it once had are long in the past. I think that is good and bad. It's good if they can't meddle in the backyard of every nation on Earth like it's a giant game of 'Risk'.

It's a bad thing in that even paranoids have enemies and the United States DOES have a few out there. With this total lack of ability to keep secrecy, the CIA sure won't be the ones we can count on to warn us when the real thing is coming at us some day. I want a refund. My tax money seems to have been badly wasted here.



posted on Sep, 23 2011 @ 01:31 AM
link   
enlighten your self



"Jihad" in Arabic The Arabic word "jihad" is a noun. Its singular past tense verb is "jahada" (masculine) or "jahadat" (feminine). The singular active participle of "jihad" is "mujahid" (masculine) or "mujahida"(feminine). The root of the word "jihad" is "juhd" which means "effort." Another related word is "ijtihad"which means "working hard or diligently." Jihad is simply the process of "exerting the best efforts," involving some form of "struggle" and "resistance," to achieve a particular goal. In other words, jihad is the struggle against, or resistance to, something for the sake of a goal. The meaning of the word is independent of the nature of the invested efforts or the sought goal. Contrary to common belief, the word "jihad" does not necessarily imply any violent effort, let alone "war" and such instances of extreme violence. It is a general term that can mean violent as well as peaceful actions, depending on the context in which it is used, as we shall indeed see later. Similarly, "jihad" as a generic word can be used even when the sought goals are not Islamic, i.e. in non-religious contexts.


www.quranicstudies.com...



posted on Sep, 23 2011 @ 01:36 AM
link   
So official proof that USA is a state sponsor of terror is now available



posted on Sep, 23 2011 @ 02:45 AM
link   
reply to post by ludwigvonmises003
 


It's not the USA (as a whole) it would be incredibly naive and misleading to say so.

But certainly some individuals, private investors within powerful political positions have the potential to sponsor terrorism for their own benefits.



posted on Sep, 23 2011 @ 04:46 AM
link   
reply to post by NeverForget
 


Yes and have you ever studied the history of destabilization of nations which are not puppets to USA.
Study it and then respond.USA is state sponsor of terrorism and genocide across the world.



posted on Sep, 23 2011 @ 05:09 AM
link   
reply to post by ludwigvonmises003
 


As are, demonstrably Russia, Isreal,Pakistan, Iran, Britain, the list is endless....its all a feaking game of power



posted on Sep, 23 2011 @ 05:18 AM
link   
reply to post by stirling
 


England ,Israel,Pakistan yes. The remainder nations ?debatable.



new topics

top topics



 
7

log in

join