It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New Twin Tower Collapse Model Could Squash 9/11 Conspiracies

page: 8
11
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 28 2011 @ 03:11 AM
link   
reply to post by Bob Sholtz
 


Investigators, good ones, don't go, I going to look at tons of evidence and ignore it, and instead chases a baseless theory because I'm suspicious of some people with no tangible connection to the crime.

You'd have to act purely on faith, and that's not what investigators do.




posted on Sep, 28 2011 @ 03:20 AM
link   
reply to post by sith9157
 


Why not ask the the other 99.9% of architects and engineers who DON'T belong to that ridiculous orginisation?



posted on Sep, 28 2011 @ 06:04 AM
link   
reply to post by spw184
 

how do you expect the collapse of the majority of the building to be explained if you only look at a few floors? the 20% could have been just the falling top floors which wouldn't be a good approximation of the overall collapse at all. besides, you want to know where the evidence for explosives went? there would be no reason to plant any devices in the top floors if you planned to destroy the rest of the building, so if only the top floors were inspected (as is possible), this would also give a very inaccurate view of reality.

btw. why investigate for controlled demolition? even if you want to toss out all the witness testimony, police, firefighters, and citizens, of bombs going off in the basement before the plane ever hit, and the molten steel, and explosion sounds, it is actually the protocol to investigate for bombs and explosives/controlled demolition.

seems like everyone made up their minds pretty quickly.
edit on 28-9-2011 by Bob Sholtz because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 28 2011 @ 06:05 AM
link   
reply to post by spw184
 


Strange all this stuff coming out just after the 911 anniversary.....



posted on Sep, 28 2011 @ 06:08 AM
link   
reply to post by captainnotsoobvious
 

investigators are supposed to follow protocol. they didn't. there is plenty of evidence of CD. just because you don't want to believe it doesn't make it false.



posted on Sep, 28 2011 @ 05:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
reply to post by captainnotsoobvious
 

investigators are supposed to follow protocol. they didn't. there is plenty of evidence of CD. just because you don't want to believe it doesn't make it false.


It also doesn't make it true.



posted on Sep, 28 2011 @ 08:01 PM
link   
reply to post by spw184
 

well when there's witness testimony and audio/video evidence, along with motive and means, it's enough to warrant a new independent investigation. around 40% of americans believe the OS isn't true. that is a huge amount of people, and their concerns should be addressed if there is nothing to hide.



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join