good post but needs paragraphs . i didnt look at the links but took your word . i was interested in the part where you described the original
researcher as schizophrenic.
if he was diagnosed he was likely subject to forced intervention such as medication in the form of 'chemicals for the brain'
the fact is , science does NOT understand the ways the brain function , science postulates hypothesis that mental illnesses are caused by 'chemical
imbalances' in the brain.
this makes the whole area of brain function taboo , secretised and an object of confusion. that includes the bits about the spinal column bathing the
brain in csf< or whatever that aspect of supercomplicated organic-chemistry does.
levels of dopamine - lack of iinhibitors for it , is cited as a major cause of psychotic disorder such as schizophrenia . yet there is no scientific
test for dopamine levels in the brain > treatment then is enforced on pure assumptions.
too much knowledge about the very vulnerable nature of our brain systems , and of the ultra complex systems the brain or brains use(s) being near
completely unknown by practising medics , is dangerous and cannot be allowed .
we live in a culture where it is an expectation laid upon us , now by society at large , that we accept medical interventions on the basis of it being
'scientific' .
it would be hoped that individual members of society will 'give up' their very brains , their very tool of thought , to so called scientific
knowledge . as for me i am keeping my yawn . my brain decides when to have it , and no one else's.

