So who is watching the GOP debate in a few minutes?

Originally posted by TDawgRex
reply to post by wWizard

 

I hope it's a Paul / Cain ticket.

Now that would be a new morning in America.

If I had the right to vote, I'd sooo support this. Star sir.

Now we have to listen to these babbling idiots....

reply to post by TDawgRex


They know they aren't going to get elected? So they just want to sell some books?

I'm calling it the Rick Romney show.

reply to post by Lorienth
Cain as president of the senate, casting deciding votes that might involve his aggression towards Islam or his tendencies toward supporting the Fed...hmmm.

Maybe some other cabinet position, but I'd be worried about some of his views affecting some pretty important votes in the event of a tie.

Originally posted by TDawgRex
reply to post by boncho

 

But in my opinion. they are not doing to good.

Based upon the crowds reaction.

They keep referancing each others books. What's up with that?

Any attention is good attention. People are dumb downed by media already, this is just the same tactics being used. The reason people watch Jersey Shore, American Idol, Survivor, is not for the content. It's for popularity. I think this is being manipulated the same.

Romney/Perry, did you see those two go at it?


....if they are being talked about, negative or positive, they are the popular vote.

Originally posted by Praetorius
reply to post by eLPresidente

 

Yeah, so far this is what I'm tracking - x's are direct questions, i's are follow-ups or jump-ins:

Perry - xixixixxixi
Romney - xiiiixxxxi
Bachmann - xxixx
Santorum - xxxix
Gingrich - xxx
Huntsman- xixiix
Cain - xxxx
Paul - xxx
Johnson - xx

All - x (Johnson, Santorum, Gingrich, Paul, Perry, Romney(i), Bachmann, Cain, Huntsman)

Here we go, some actual reporting!

Ron Paul only getting 3 questions when he is polling third nationally, a top tier candidate getting 2nd to the last amount of questions asked?

If this isn't blatant manipulation, I don't know what is.

Who would ya'll vote for if you HAD to choose between Mitt and Rick?

Originally posted by Praetorius
reply to post by eLPresidente

 

Yeah, so far this is what I'm tracking - x's are direct questions, i's are follow-ups or jump-ins:

Perry - xixixixxixi
Romney - xiiiixxxxi
Bachmann - xxixx
Santorum - xxxix
Gingrich - xxx
Huntsman- xixiix
Cain - xxxx
Paul - xxx
Johnson - xx

All - x (Johnson, Santorum, Gingrich, Paul, Perry, Romney(i), Bachmann, Cain, Huntsman)

This is the definition of Fair and Balanced, no?

reply to post by Lorienth


I think that their political philosophies would compliment each other.

They both seem to have the Nations success at heart overall.

Originally posted by BeyondPerception

Originally posted by Praetorius
reply to post by eLPresidente

 

Yeah, so far this is what I'm tracking - x's are direct questions, i's are follow-ups or jump-ins:

Perry - xixixixxixi
Romney - xiiiixxxxi
Bachmann - xxixx
Santorum - xxxix
Gingrich - xxx
Huntsman- xixiix
Cain - xxxx
Paul - xxx
Johnson - xx

All - x (Johnson, Santorum, Gingrich, Paul, Perry, Romney(i), Bachmann, Cain, Huntsman)

This is the definition of Fair and Balanced, no?

To be fair, it's pretty fair and balanced for FOX standards.

Who would ya'll vote for if you HAD to choose between Mitt and Rick?

reply to post by Linkamoto


Obama

Originally posted by boncho
To be fair, it's pretty fair and balanced for FOX standards.

They have standards

The 30 second question asked to each candidate -

Paul : "People create the jobs, not the government"

'Mass Applause'

Chris : "Waiting for the applause......'

Originally posted by boncho

Originally posted by TDawgRex
reply to post by wWizard

 

I hope it's a Paul / Cain ticket.

Now that would be a new morning in America.

With the time they are giving people, the focus, it sounds like it will be Perry/Romney and Romney for the win. The entire night has been about the both of them, the more time they give them the fresher they will be in people's minds. And it looks like they are shaping Perry to be the idiot (or he is shaping himself?)

The others are getting more time than before.

That's a change.

Curious: Who gets invited to these debates in the audience? They CLEARLY like Paul's responses the best. And I must say, Paul has knocked every one of his (few) questions out of the park!

Woot Paul just got his dig in...crowd loved it too.

HUNTSMAN BORES ME...HE IS THE MEH CANDIDATE

reply to post by Linkamoto
Ugh...I'm inclined to believe that the devil I know is better than the devil I don't know...but with Romney's record of changing positions or breaking promises as is expedient I see too much Obama, and with Perry I get way too much Bush. And they're both friendly-ish with big business corporatocracy...

Ouch. I really think I'd have to pick Romney...but I wouldn't be able to vote. Sitting this one out again if I can't support Paul, or at least get over some of the other gripes I have with Johnson or Newt.

Originally posted by buni11687
Paul : "People create the jobs, not the government"

'Mass Applause'

Chris : "Waiting for the applause......'

Paul had an OUTSTANDING response to the jobs issue. If he doesn't get air time after this, I will be more than convinced, that the elections are rigged.

LOL @ Johnson... Awesome