reply to post by mike dangerously
I agree Mike, but while I appreciate Max Cleland's willingness to speak up, I also have to question what he did after quitting the commission. Why
wasn't he more vocal? Why didn't he continue to investigate on his own and burn the one's were responsible for the stonewalling? I don't think he
did the right thing by quitting. He should have stayed in, learned as much as he could, continue to look into the suspicions, been vocal when the
report came out, and call the responsible ones out publicly. Instead he says, "I... cannot look any American in the eye, especially family members of
victims, and say the commission had full access. This investigation is now compromised." and fades away. Something interesting is that he was
defeated in the '02 election because his opponent, Saxby Chambliss, equated him to Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein by not supporting homeland security
measures. That is interesting because anyone who thought about speaking out has an example of the backlash of doing so. This is a man who lost his
legs in the Vietnam War, yet, was equated to a terrorist for voting against homeland security. Truly sickening, Karl Rove, truly sickening.
Saudi Intelligence was definitely aware of the hijackers and so was the ISI. Now what some of us had suspected has been confirmed. The CIA, NSA and
the FBI were also well aware them. Not only did they fail to do their jobs, we have proof that they physically helped them by at the very least
blocking info to allow them the freedom to do their mission. I believe it goes deeper than that, but I am only going to comment on the facts this
thread has confirmed.