It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RebelRouser
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by RebelRouser
reply to post by MrXYZ
100,573,245- check it. prove me wrong
the reason why evolutionists get away with what they can^ is just like thisedit on 23-11-2011 by RebelRouser because: (no reason given)
Present evidence that this number is correct. If you can't, your answer simply isn't scientific.
Thanks for proving my point
years of flied tests and 20 recounts
Originally posted by RebelRouser
reply to post by RebelRouser
now wheres your's on the dna linking man to ape? besides "its similar". cause ill show you mine being almost like my dog's. i provided u with evidence.i said i tested it
Thanks to the discovery of DNA, it is now possible for scientists to identify not just the genes, but the individual bases. Before the discovery of DNA, scientists could only uncover the evolutionary tree of life by comparing the bodies and cells of different species. Now they can compare their genetic codes, working their way down to the deepest branches of life dating back billions of years.
Originally posted by ElohimJD
reply to post by MrXYZ
Everything I qouted that Evolution claims came from the Evolution wikipeadia page. How can you claim Evolution does not state these things when that is exactly where the quotes come from.
I will not present the evidence of the global flood, because of the haughty attitiude of the individual wanting to know. Truth is not owed to you and God does not give truth to those of a pride filled mind (not humble).
I have studied evolution thoroghly and if you think I am claiming something incorrect about what Evolution states then it is your research that needs some work.
Again the OP was asking to proove Evolution false. That has been done in my posting using the Theory of Evolution and the Law of Biogenesis. If you would like to discuss this proof further then fine. But I will not get pulled into an argument from someone who is not seeking truth but rather seeking to find fault in it.
God Bless,edit on 23-11-2011 by ElohimJD because: (no reason given)
its called diversity- its why we aren't identical cutout looking
1. the fossil record of change in earlier species-
yea its called barly scratching the surface. look at how an muscle works. its so complicated these genius's cant even comprehend how to begin copying that
2. the chemical and anatomical similarities of related life forms-
where else are they gonna go? space? ever seen how a dandelion woks? it just felt a breeze on it for years and years and knew its seeds had to produce seeds that could take flight in wind right? evolution is gods way of waking life work. for some reason man likes to give the credit to nature just being so smart. take something like a camel. scince would say that it had to travel long journeys with little water so it just adapted. wtf happend with these ancient men that traveld miles and miles? wheres our water sacks today? and if you say "thats why we were smart enough to make containers" its gonna be the stupidest thing ive ever heard. again evolution picking and choosing what it wants to make better on what species based on.. what? morals or just because?
3. the geographic distribution of related species-
but i dont see any crazy changes in any animals that have been here forever. evolutions on vacation for these last say 11,565 years and the best change you get out of them is the size? now im convinced... im also convinced that u will never see what i see, and ill never see what you see, and at some point i just have to accept u think we were apes and you have to accept i believe in man has always been just man.
4. the recorded genetic changes in living organisms over many generations-
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by ElohimJD
reply to post by MrXYZ
Everything I qouted that Evolution claims came from the Evolution wikipeadia page. How can you claim Evolution does not state these things when that is exactly where the quotes come from.
I will not present the evidence of the global flood, because of the haughty attitiude of the individual wanting to know. Truth is not owed to you and God does not give truth to those of a pride filled mind (not humble).
I have studied evolution thoroghly and if you think I am claiming something incorrect about what Evolution states then it is your research that needs some work.
Again the OP was asking to proove Evolution false. That has been done in my posting using the Theory of Evolution and the Law of Biogenesis. If you would like to discuss this proof further then fine. But I will not get pulled into an argument from someone who is not seeking truth but rather seeking to find fault in it.
God Bless,edit on 23-11-2011 by ElohimJD because: (no reason given)
So you have evidence of a global flood but are "hiding it"?
Riiiiight
You clearly haven't studied the theory, because every single point you made was debunked. You are basically preaching
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by Barcs
And how does your answer explain that you know none of it happened?
No need to wait for it, the bible has been out for a few years now.
No I comprehend it, its just that the changes needed would require stages, which would require some time. Now if you believe otherwise, the changes would be to fast and to severe and cause the species to die out.
Ignoring what I present does not mean I haven't presented anything plausible. I'm not ignoring evidence, I'm ignoring theory.
Well we could in fact be related to him, as much as its also possible he isn't from earth either. There is no evidence however that we completely originated from his species. This is why you guys are so gullible. Do you realize that the events that needed to take place to connect us to primates, could just as much connect us to anything else?
Well science has only been blind to this because there are still a vast majority that refuses to believe in the supernatural. 5 million species are working against your theory because you claim we have found fossils, yet we see no other life that has evolved, or is in the stages of evolution. You have to be so naive to believe this stuff.
Your talking about major differences in evolution when science says there are acceptable differences within reason.
No I haven't ignored it, I have made it clear that small changes are acceptable, and large ones would cause the species to die out. So I go back to saying that it would take trillions of years. It's not that your thinking outside the box here, its more like your thinking outside the building.
I think this excuse is about as lame as why we have no proof of aliens. We do have proof but people turn their heads. I'm sorry why you think we need to pretend fossilication is needed to locate these bones when we seem to be able to find dinasour bones and they are much older.
Not fossils of transisition we dont. It would simply be another species.
Well I had to throw in my two cents on this because I don't believe in faith. I do however believe God was a person at one time many years ago, and passed on just like how he told us he will no longer be able to tend to us.
No you missed the point, we would all die before puberty without medical intervention.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Well now your contradicting yourself because it is something you believe in.There are some real parts to evolution and I'm talking about microevolution but anything other than that is out of the box and never been witnessed. The funny part is how it happened to us, and has never been witnessed in any of the other 5 million species on earth. Sorry man it sounds like you have a tad more faith than I do. Nothing wrong with that however its better to stand for something otherwise youll fall for anything. So this must be your first faith. Intervention is not my first faith if you can even call it a faith. Faith is found in story books IMO.
Well I totally understand the concept and macro evolution is not the same as micro evolution, nor does accepting one automatically accept the other.
Even though this is a couple pages back, I wanted to make a point about it. All macro-evolution is, is a whole lot of micro-evolution.
If you accept micro-evolution, you automatically accept macro-evolution given the factor of time.
There is no faith. It's called perspective. If you change only a small detail of a painting, it will still look like the same painting. The dot you changed may be noticeable or it may be blatant, but the majority of the painting will still be there. Keep changing hundreds and thousands of dots, and suddenly your painting will look completely different, except it's not that simple. The dots are not random, but are slowly selected based on environment and breeding patterns, so the new picture will appear very different depending on how these thousands of little changes came about.
This is how you get new species and types of organisms. It is just changing one little thing at a time thousands of times.
The example that keeps getting thrown at me is a tornado ripping though a junk yard and magically assembling a 747 air craft, thats able to fly. How gullible. Micro evolution would be one piece of the plane finding its way back to another piece.
There is no evidence, there is theory and speculation. We have never witnessed humans evolving. So you seriously think that a tornado could put an airplane back together, over an alien abducting us and transporting us to a different planet?
And that's why it took 3.7b years.
As for your probability example, that's seriously flawed. Chances of someone getting hit by lightning are crazy small too, yet it happens all the time. And of course we have ACTUAL EVIDENCE showing us exactly how it happened.
Originally posted by OLD HIPPY DUDE
What form of dating is accepted by those who believe in evolution ?
What artifacts are acceptable in the basis of evolutionary belief ?
I'm currious, how did you come up with 3.7b years?
And that's why it took 3.7b years.
Originally posted by RebelRouser
reply to post by colin42
you answer questions with questions a lot. besides i dont see you supporting the real evidence. show me the pictures that lead you to believe that this definitely happened. before u answer that with a question. ill give you mine. here the thing is i believed wayy before i found out about these.
With one vital difference, it's not listed in the non fiction section.
Fiction being old does not make it more factual. Guess I should wait two-thousand years and pull out my Harry Potter series, eh? It stands as proof that there are wizards among us. It's true because it says it is.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by Varemia
Fiction being old does not make it more factual. Guess I should wait two-thousand years and pull out my Harry Potter series, eh? It stands as proof that there are wizards among us. It's true because it says it is.
With one vital difference, it's not listed in the non fiction section.
Are you sure your not confusing the term fairy tale with something that your just not comprehending correctly. I just have to ask because when I read the bible as a supernatural message, just like it is introduced to be, it totally makes sense.
I think your confusing supernatural with magic and imaginary friends. Of course if you don't know anything about the supernatural, you wont understand it. I'll give you a good hint however. Listen to katy perrys song called ET, that sends a pretty clear definition of whats going on.