It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No they are still right, you just now have to add another step.
I'm sorry but believing we bottlenecked though one life is just idiotic, especially since the assam tribune clearly points out we never dropped below tens of thousands. So where are the bones ????????
I never did believe in it, I was just giving you the benefit of the doubt to see if the steps would work.
Not sure if you wanted authors or website, how about both. Remember the one I plagerized.... www.newgeology.us... It's the non scientific read which makes it a tad easier to hold.
Whenever variation is pushed to extremes by selective breeding (to get the most milk from cows, sugar from beets, bristles on fruit flies, or any other characteristic), the line becomes sterile and dies out. And as one characteristic increases, others diminish.
Actually we didn't diverge, we actaully crossbreeded, which is also in the bible. Now its another subject that goes against my belief and understanding but it might just be possible that specific humanoid species are cross breedable.
Not including primates however, LOL.
Well maybe in your opinion, but IMO I have yet to see a strand of evolution work that sounds plausable.
True, not anymore than it proves evolution.
When I look at these I see the possibility of other life from the cosmos that were visitors at one point. If they were human, then they are human. If they were another species, then they were another species. It once again proves that we are not alone in the universe.
So people move around. I guess I don't see the connection. I'm in the united states, we are a melting pot of life from all over the globe.
Just because its down to sections of our life does not account for all of our life. It's like you found one bone of a transgressed primate so you call that proof.
Of course we can predict. And its easy to accept knowing we will never be around to see the affects of it.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
So let me get this straight. You think we evolved from apes or something else in 15 million years. Now we can find bones to diansours that were here way back before that, but we can't find any bones to prove transgression.
It "only" took 15m years as we now know
Let me break this down for you so its easier to see how impossible evolution is.
1st. you have to have mutations typically from radiation, to cause the types of changes we are talking about. But lets agree for the argument this actually happened. Now typically you will end up with mass defects along these stages, making it more than obvious, radiation played a part in this. Of course this species also dies out very quickly. But lets ignore that step even though its a vital one.
2nd you have to have the same mutation happen to mass amounts of people at the same time, and in the same way.
The reason is because if you don't, then you would be left with only one or two people to produce offspring which would be incest, and the race would die out quick and in a cruel way. But lest assume we made it past this part too.
3rd Stages 1 and 2 would have to happen to mass amounts of people in the same way, over the course of millions of years. There of course would be mass amounts of bones left behind to prove this step, its vital to identify, and there is simply no excuse for us not having this proof.
4th stage. Lets assume we still made it over all these hurdles, we should have mass variable stages of evolution with all 5 million species. Keep in mind we have NONE. It's a cold dose of reality that makes me wonder how you guys can belive in such nonsense. Any claim to be found are quickly debunked, and I for one would have no problem accepting one, as long as it can be proven its good proof. I would have no problem believing in this crap if there was some substance to it.
5th stage. Our DNA would have to play hide and seek with us hiding the real truth which is telling us that we are 200,000 years old. It makes no sense to have 200,000 year old DNA if we evolved millions of years ago, unless the DNA changes the way evolutionists think. If it does, then DNA is completly useless in pathlogy.
6th stage. All and any proof of evolution would have to dissapear off the face of the earth, only leaving behind what we have today. In addition all evolution would also have to stop at this point otherwise we would be able to trace it.
Depends on how you look at it.
So they're still right, even though you admitted to making the first one up and that the second one was wrong?
So this is sticking to one of my steps.
We didn't bottleneck through one organism. If you're seriously making this claim, then you clearly don't understand how mtDNA is passed down. Your "where are the bones" question has been answered repeatedly. Go back and look at the replies to your posts.
Because they were all ludicris but I pretended for the moment they were possible.
How were you giving me the benefit of the doubt when they were your steps?
Originally posted by itsthetooth
I'm assuming your referring to the bible. Not sure which book. Anyhow, how do you know its a storybook. I have never read anything in it or the preface that indicates that it is or isn't anything specific. Of course without supernatural understanding, I can see why you might look at it like that. Current belief and religion are just all wrong, so if thats what your basing your attituide on your feelings are understandable.
Trillions of years is what it would take for us to have evolved from slime, the way that evolutionists think we have. The problem here is there has never been a confirmed case of anything evolving from anything. Now we have over 5 million species on our planet alone but we can't find anything that has left any trace evidence of evolving from anything else.
I'm going to go with the numbers. IMO 5 million is a lot and says your wrong.
the problem here is there has never been a confirmed case of anything evolving from anything.
If you have to ask, your not from here. If you have to think about it, your not from here, if you have to question it, your not from here.
but we can't find any bones to prove transgression.
you have to have the same mutation happen to mass amounts of people at the same time, and in the same way. The reason is because if you don't, then you would be left with only one or two people to produce offspring which would be incest, and the race would die out quick and in a cruel way. But lest assume we made it past this part too.
There of course would be mass amounts of bones left behind to prove this step, its vital to identify, and there is simply no excuse for us not having this proof.
Another lie. We have millions of fossils. Where do you come up with all this unsourced nonsense?
we should have mass variable stages of evolution with all 5 million species. Keep in mind we have NONE.
and I for one would have no problem accepting one, as long as it can be proven its good proof. I would have no problem believing in this crap if there was some substance to it.
Our DNA would have to play hide and seek with us hiding the real truth which is telling us that we are 200,000 years old. It makes no sense to have 200,000 year old DNA if we evolved millions of years ago, unless the DNA changes the way evolutionists think. If it does, then DNA is completly useless in pathlogy.
All and any proof of evolution would have to dissapear off the face of the earth, only leaving behind what we have today. In addition all evolution would also have to stop at this point otherwise we would be able to trace it.
And how does your answer explain that you know none of it happened?
You aren't reading the posts or have very poor reading comprehension. I was responding to your question asking what if the book contained scientific facts instead of stories. I'm not referring to any specific book, just answering your question. I know the bible is a story because... wait for it... it is full of stories! Amazing isn't it?
No I comprehend it, its just that the changes needed would require stages, which would require some time. Now if you believe otherwise, the changes would be to fast and to severe and cause the species to die out.
I asked where you got the trillions of years figure from. You are just assuming it would take forever since you can't comprehend it.
Ignoring what I present does not mean I haven't presented anything plausible. I'm not ignoring evidence, I'm ignoring theory.
No. The problem here is that you have ignored every piece of evidence presented to you that shows exactly that. There are thousands of fossils. You need to stop making stuff up. That is 100% false. Your reasoning is illogical and you haven't presented any objective evidence yet.
Well we could in fact be related to him, as much as its also possible he isn't from earth either. There is no evidence however that we completly originated from his species. This is why you guys are so gullible. Do you realize that the events that needed to take place to connect us to primates, could just as much connect us to anything else?
So since some humans ask the question, it automatically means we're not from here? Really? Where do you come up with this stuff? Science has been trying to solve the mystery for centuries, and it's solved. We evolved from homo habilis. All the evidence proves this.
How does 5 million species on planet earth say that evolution is wrong? Keep making things up and repeating yourself. It won't make it true.
Well science has only been blind to this because there are still a vast majority that refuses to believe in the supernatural. 5 million species are working against your theory because you claim we have found fossils, yet we see no other life that has evolved, or is in the stages of evolution. You have to be so naive to believe this stuff.
So since some humans ask the question, it automatically means we're not from here? Really? Where do you come up with this stuff? Science has been trying to solve the mystery for centuries, and it's solved. We evolved from homo habilis. All the evidence proves this.
How does 5 million species on planet earth say that evolution is wrong? Keep making things up and repeating yourself. It won't make it true.
The links you provide only shows what they think we evolved from. I want to see something we KNOW we evolved from.
Another lie. We've posted the fossil evidence like 10 times. Ignorance is bliss I guess.
No I haven't ignored it, I have made it clear that small changes are acceptable, and large ones would cause the species to die out. So I go back to saying that it would take trillions of years. It's not that your thinking outside the box here, its more like your thinking outside the building.
Wrong. Small mutations are bred into the species over time. They don't suddenly become a new species because of tiny change. They pass the change on to their offspring. This has also been addressed, and you choose to ignore the facts yet again.
I think this excuse is about as lame as why we have no proof of aliens. We do have proof but people turn their heads. I'm sorry why you think we need to pretend fossilication is needed to locate these bones when we seem to be able to find dinasour bones and they are much older.
Fossils have been found, but they aren't abundant because fossilization is rare. Another point that's already been debunked.
Not fossils of transisition we dont. It would simply be another species.
Another lie. We have millions of fossils. Where do you come up with all this unsourced nonsense?
I'm ranking your theory right up there with president Regans trickle down theory. Give all the money to the big businesses and the money will trickle down to all the employees. Of course it never worked. The reason is simple. If there is no rule that says they had to share money with the employees, why should they. Evolution is sort of the same w
I'm sorry,man, but you keep spitting out lie after lie. It's been proven in this thread that you will not accept good proof or even consider it.
Evolution is sort of the same way, we have yet to determine the mechanisim that forced this. Now again I understand there are theorys that make this work, and it seems to be theory, based on theory, based on theory, based on wait for it..... nothing.
I'm sorry,man, but you keep spitting out lie after lie. It's been proven in this thread that you will not accept good proof or even consider it.
If you seriously believe in this, why is it a fact that we were better off back then?
You need to read a book on evolution, even a grammar school level book explains this clearly. You have absolutely no clue about what you're saying. Homo sapiens emerged from homo habilis or antecessor around 200,000 years ago. The ancestor we share with chimps and bonobos goes back millions of years. It's all just different branches of the same tree, splitting at different times. Humans didn't just appear 200,000 years ago. They changed enough to make it noticeable on the fossil record. There isn't a set date where all humans were suddenly humans. You can still see the differences in the various human races today, something that you have ignored at least 3 times when I asked. Explain the various races of human without evolution.
Well its very kind of you to share your time for sure.
Normally I'd ignore you, but I'm bored at work today, so you're getting the full treatment. You seem to enjoy being dishonest. There is TONS of proof of evolution. What makes you think it stopped? Again, the races of human PROVE evolution is still active today. 200,000 years it takes to divide humans into several races. Not trillions, 200,000.
Well it was a crash course statement that I feel has a lot of truth behind it. It's not that simple untill many things are summed up. I think if we have to dig up bones to try to find proof, something is wrong. Why was this knowledge not shared? Why was there no records kept? Why are we not seeing ourselves evolve now? After all your admitting we are 200,000 years old. I will never believe we evolved into an unhealthier species, which is exactly what has happened. Oh sure primates get sick, but not like us. They don't have doctors in the wild, they don't have pharmacys, they don't have medications, and they don't require intervention to make it past puberty.
I guess a bunch of others already debunked this but you keep making stuff up and thinking its true. I posted the free evolution DVD resources earlier in the thread. They are free, including shipping, so please watch them, and then come back and ask any questions you have about evolution. The failure to learn is on you. I'd love to learn more about the facts behind your theory, but your strongest argument is "we don't fit in, and we ask why, therefor we aren't from here". Try using science to come to that conclusion and see what happens.
the funniest thing i find about an evolutionist is the fact that probably 80% of the people who believe it dont actually grasp the material.
After all your admitting we are 200,000 years old. I will never believe we evolved into an unhealthier species, which is exactly what has happened.
Your serious ??? You actually believe that huh? Tell me about a primate that needs medical attention to live past puberty because if we don't get our shots, we die. Tell me about a primate that has to frequent doctors and medication like we do. Tell me about a primate in the wild that has to get booster shots. Seriously dude your making me laugh.
And just like the rest of your posts, that's 100% nonsense
We aren't unhealthier, hell, thanks to evolution, we actually evolved to the point where we are now 100% resistant to disease we weren't resistant to just a few 100 years ago. Disease that instantly kill a monkey for example.
So your argument that we've become less healthy is nonsense. That is, unless you take into consideration the unhealthy food we now eat...but that's got nothing to do with evolution, it's a product of our economic system
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Your serious ??? You actually believe that huh? Tell me about a primate that needs medical attention to live past puberty because if we don't get our shots, we die. Tell me about a primate that has to frequent doctors and medication like we do. Tell me about a primate in the wild that has to get booster shots. Seriously dude your making me laugh.
And just like the rest of your posts, that's 100% nonsense
We aren't unhealthier, hell, thanks to evolution, we actually evolved to the point where we are now 100% resistant to disease we weren't resistant to just a few 100 years ago. Disease that instantly kill a monkey for example.
So your argument that we've become less healthy is nonsense. That is, unless you take into consideration the unhealthy food we now eat...but that's got nothing to do with evolution, it's a product of our economic system
If you think we evolved, we DE-EVOLVED.
And btw the reason we are eating unhealthy food is because WE MADE the food. The question here is if your smart enough to understand why we made the food. Its because something we are seeking in our INTENDED diet is NOT HERE.edit on 22-11-2011 by itsthetooth because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by RebelRouser
im just happy to hear that all of you are smarter than Einstein..
Originally posted by RebelRouser
im just happy to hear that all of you are smarter than Einstein..
Originally posted by Nosred
Originally posted by RebelRouser
im just happy to hear that all of you are smarter than Einstein..
When did Einstein ever say he didn't believe in evolution? He certainly didn't believe the Earth was only 6,000 years old.
Not to mention that he was a physicist and not a biologist, so he's hardly an authority on the subject of evolution.
Originally posted by RebelRouser
reply to post by Nosred
dont you think its hypocritical to say i dont understand evolution when you clearly dont understand christianity. maybe its you that needs to be doing the reading..
25 Myths About Christianity.. (to name a few)
2. A Christian must attend church every week or else!
11. Christianity is really only a crutch.
13. Christianity is just like all the other faiths in the world. They are all equally correct.
17. Christians aren’t allowed to think for themselves.
22. Christians must believe that the world was created 6000-10000 years ago in six 24-hour days.