It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Um, no, it didn't. You assert that the child had three parents, but all the genetic data correlates to humans. They found an X and Y chromosome, human mitochondrial DNA, a partially complete Chromosome 1 (from a human), and they still haven't mapped the rest of the genome. I and others have shown you pictures of children with hydrocephalus that have heads that look almost exactly the same as the star child.
What is the miscommunication here, and how does this have anything to do with evolution?
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by Varemia
I do, I think that its pretty complex but planets are made with life existing on them. We should have never have been brought here. Now we are suffering with little hope at this point of getting back. It even says in the bible that earth is not our home, and that nothing on earth is from our home and unlike anything from home.
This was all a way to controll us. If we want to go back, and get our abilitys back, and have all of the defects removed from our genes, we will comply with what god wanted. Which at the time was mining gold.
Jesus was brought in to tease us into servituide. Jesus was a human that was in tact without all of the punishments and abilitys removed. Jesus was not special, he was normal. We are the odd balls.
what im saying is dung beetles, ants, cockroaches, termites, etc. were specifically made for cleanup, nothing more..they werent made to make decisions that could either destroy the world or enable it to flourish is more my point. why were we granted that power?
look at the grizzly population when the settlers moved across the states. it dwindled to practically nothing. that would go for all endangered species. what would happen if we weren't told to protect them? shouldnt they evolve and not let that happen? let me guess "they were much weaker than you cause we are far superior" even though according to you we came from them.. makes no sense
well wtf is taking the siberian tiger so long to pull through by evolving? or the komodo dragon, grizzly, and blue whale? is their time just up? evolution should do something about that cause it sounds like the pressures on..
it just doesn't explain why we were monkeys. sorry..
you cant explain why everything is as diverse as it is.
like explain color
and appreciation for it or for anything for that matter.
explain love, but most of all explain why if everything else in your evolution idea, meshes together forming us into what we are. why do we not just do our one purpose like everything else and contribute?
why did we excel and everything else paled in comparison?
I see. We're making progress on getting your explanation out then. How were these planets made with the diversity of life already on them? What way was it done that is a better explanation than evolution, and is applicable in our daily lives to predict future outcomes within organisms?
We don't fit here, we wear clothing, have a complex social structure to allow us to adapt. I believe that who ever or what ever created us would have been smart enough to also make a planet thats well suited for us.
This planet sucks for us and we don't belong. Our rejection on this planet is so obvious that people do things in the realm of self abuse because they are stuck here not even realizing whats going on. Drugs, drinking, cutting, suicide, murder.
If we were home, there would be things that automatically accomodate our needs. Here we adapt and make things to accomodate us.Its all backwards and its the price to pay for being out of your element.
I'm not able to easily find anything that seems to tie us to this planet. We do breath air, and drink water but we can't even drink the water unless its processed first for safety. Ant eaters and woodchucks fit in better than we do. It's as though we have no business here. Nothing would miss us if we disapeared and we aren't part of any food chain.
A lot of people have been thrown off track simply accepting our difference as some sort of evolution from primates. The fact is we have books that are telling us we are NOT from here. Evolutionists choose to igonore this.
We might also have proof in the lack of transgression. It should be not only everywhere but should still be happening. Non of which is the case. DNA can't change or morph into another species, and thats what evolutionists think is going on.In isolated tests some very slight genetic drift was witnessed and the species would die out fast from it everytime.
For us to evolve from primates would be a hell of a lot more than a slight change.It would be many large changes that would have to have been repeated many times, by thousands to avoid incest. It's simply not possible.
I think most might feel that I want to believe ET put me here over evolution. To be honest I wish it were harder to believe in it, because I think very few understand just how screwed we are.
They were "made" for cleanup? By who? Where' s the evidence?
Apes (whom with we share a common ancestor) and humans are both modern species.
(In a letter to The Times (November 25th 1978), Dr. Halstead (who once worked in the Natural History Museum) claimed that "according to Hinton (a former Keeper of Zoology) the Piltdown man hoax was planned and executed within the Museum" and that others including Teilhard were involved. This is confirmed by the secrecy surrounding the fossil, experts only being allowed closely to examine plaster replicas. This indicates that the hoax was known at a very high level.
Let’s assume that evolution could be true. As all animals and plants could be traced back to a common ancestor, the common ancestor must be one that has to be capable in asexual reproduction. The only living things that could be found to be asexual reproduction are archaea, bacteria, protists, algae and fungi. As all these living things are either micro-organisms or the selected plants instead of any other living things, it implies the common ancestor could be either micro-organism or the selected plants.
(a) Conical and (b) pseudo-columnar ‘stromatoloids’ from the Strelley Pool Chert, Pilbara, Western Australia. (c) Stromatoloid produced by physical discontinuities between polymeric layers of different viscosities in experiments with synthetic polymers (McLoughlin et al. submitted). (d) Carbonaceous ‘wisps’ in the Apex Chert. Note also, carbonaceous matter concentrated around rhombic crystal growths. (e) Rounded grains of carbonaceous ‘fluff’ from the Buck Reef Chert, Barberton, South Africa. (f) Laminar, carbonaceous ‘fluff’ from mat fragments from the Buck Reef Chert, Barberton, South Africa. The presence of bends and rollover structures has been interpreted to represent the plasticity of early microbial mats. (g–i) Automonatages of microfossil-like artefacts from the Apex Chert. (g) Pseudo-septate and branched filamentous artefacts from vein chert generated from the growth of dendrites, polygonal crystal rims and spherulites. (h) Image of putative cyanobacterium Archaeoscillatoriopsis disciformis Holotype and (i) image of putative beggiatoan Eoleptonema apex Holotype (Schopf 1993) both here explained as a SOS structures resulting from the breaking of polygonal symmetry during crystal growth (false coloured images in h and i represent depth profiles within the thin section using Automontage software). (j) Spherulitic SOS from the Gwna Chert. (k) Abiogenic septate dendritic fringe of a spherulite mass, Apex Chert. (l) Abiogenic septate carbonaceous filament shown branching off spherulitic mass from the Apex Chert. Scale bar: 2 cm a,b; 1 mm c; 40 μm d–l.
Although I sure it made you feel warm and fuzzy inside to challenge my intelligence.