It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Can we put this nonsense to bed as you are not even going to accept what Pye says about a human mother. If we could bring this poor individuals parents back to life and they said they did it I am sure you would say 'not according to Pye and anyhow the parents were both alien.'
This skull is 900 years old. This individual lived around the time of William the Conqueror. The Roman Empire had risen and fallen as had many others.
Even if itsthetruth is correct the skull has nothing to say about the origins of man and the same goes for Pye. In fact if itsthetruth is correct it has nothing to do with man at all.
So again Pye comes under suspicion claiming origins with a skull that has nothing whatever to do with it even if he could show it was not fully human.
EDITED. Another question. Someone posted that the whole skeleton is/was available so why has that not been looked at? I would think there would be major differences there too or do the rest of the bones show the lie?
I don't want be accused of putting words in your mouth.
Why do evolutionist have a problem clearly stating their beliefs ?
Why should I google anything ?
Don't you know the facts in what you believe ?
If my questions are so simple why can't you answer them ?
Originally posted by seeker1963
reply to post by colin42
Well, I am not anti evolution, but I might be convinced if I saw a monkey or ape turn into a human being. I find much more believable proof in the fact that aliens altered DNA to create what we call humans....
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
Where are these official studys ????????????
Originally posted by OLD HIPPY DUDE
reply to post by MrXYZ
I don't want be accused of putting words in your mouth.
Why do evolutionist have a problem clearly stating their beliefs ?
Why should I google anything ?
Don't you know the facts in what you believe ?
If my questions are so simple why can't you answer them ?
Originally posted by micmerci
I have a question for the pro evolutionist. I think that mathematically speaking, the population of the earth would be far greater than 7 billion if man has been here reproducing as long as the theory of evolution claims we have. Can someone validate/refute this mathematically?
If you actively apply something it can't be wrong anymore. So if the theory's being used to develop medicine that works, then the theory's correct
Then you must have gone to the school of hard knocks.
Because your school obviously failed at teaching you basic biology and geology
You can watch his videos a million times, it won't change the fact that his study hasn't been published and he's merely making random claims that have been shown to be untrue by official studies
It would appear that you have no clue what a zygote is and how it requires 2 non related mothers to happen.
I watched the video YOU linked to. Pye said mtDNA clearly showed a HUMAN MOTHER but hey you have been told this over and over so believe whatever you want
Originally posted by itsthetooth
It would appear that you have no clue what a zygote is and how it requires 2 non related mothers to happen.
We know one mother was human, its the other mother thats not, this is what proves intervention.
Yes but the child will have the mtDNA of the surrogate.
You appear to be in a primary misunderstanding. I zygote is simply a mother's egg. It is nothing more, especially not a case of two mothers.
Read this about implanting a zygote in another's womb. It results in the carrying mother having no genetic relation to the child she bears:
No two aliens planted there baby into a human. The baby will have human mtDNA.
The mother was human, because the mtDNA was human. There is no evidence for a second mother. You might argue that the father was non-human, but the supplication of the Y chromosome cancels that out, doesn't it? Or do aliens now have X and Y chromosomes too?
I don't think thats always true, relegion is applied.
Then you must have gone to the school of hard knocks.
Well I think he is still trying to lean as much as he can before he publishes. One thing is for sure, one mother was human, the other was alien and the father was alien.
Yes but the child will have the mtDNA of the surrogate.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Yes but the child will have the mtDNA of the surrogate.
Originally posted by MrXYZAnd just to be perfectly clear, if male alien sperm fertilizes an alien egg, and that egg is then implaned in a human surrogate...then THERE WON'T BE ANY HUMAN DNA IN THE BABY!!! You are talking out of your ass and clearly don't know anything about medicine and biology...which isn't surprising if you get your "information" from pseudo-scientists like Pye