It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by iterationzero
reply to post by itsthetooth
Oh so your trying to say that evolution is a PROVEN theory? Can you give us a link that doesn't include statements like "in debate' or "inconclusive?" Cause no one on here has yet.
Please learn to read before you post. In the very post of mine that you quoted I said the following:
If you're referring to the theory of evolution when you say "it" in this context, then I'd agree with the first part of your statement -- it will never be a proven fact. No scientific theory will ever be a proven fact. Facts and theories don't occupy different levels on some hierarchy of information, they serve two totally different purposes and are two totally different constructs.
Did you somehow miss the part in my post, the post that you quoted in your reply, where I said the no scientific theory will ever be a proven fact?
Further, in a reply your earlier post where you made the exact same ridiculous claim, I gave you a link that explained the difference between the observable fact of evolution and the scientific theory of evolution. Here's a link to my reply to your post, and here's another link to the article I mention in that post:
Evolution is a fact and a theory.
You have now been provided twice with a link explaining why evolution is both a fact and a theory. I'm betting you won't read it this time either.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by bottleslingguy
They didn't say they threw gold in the air they said they needed it in their upper atmosphere to stay suspended as we all know today is fact.
What are you talking about??? There's no gold suspended, and it most certainly isn't a requirement. You might wanna read up on weather manipulation
Ok I read them.
I'm just a little stumped on how we evolved from slim in the short life span of this planet.
Can you explaind that to me?
And why our mtDNA is showing that we came into life all of a sudden about 200,000 years ago.
One of the misconceptions of mitochondrial Eve is that since all women alive today descended in a direct unbroken female line from her that she was the only woman alive at the time. Nuclear DNA studies indicate that the size of the ancient human population never dropped below tens of thousands. There may have been many other women alive at Eve's time with descendants alive today, but sometime in the past, those lines of descent included at least one male, who do not pass on their mother's mitochondrial DNA, thereby breaking the line of descent. By contrast, Eve's lines of descent to each person alive today includes precisely one purely matrilineal line.
Originally posted by Varemia
reply to post by itsthetooth
All of the problems you cite are extremely recent changes in humans that have taken place over the last 10,000 years as agriculture allowed us to settle down in one place and develop civilization. It has basically zero to do with evolution.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by steveknows
Look at how much and how well we have evolved...
We went from swinging on trees and throwing poo at each other to jobs, fast cars and child support.
So well that we learned that seperating parents leaves the child stuck with mostly one parent.
If things were evolving so well, we wouldn't have the tem, "life is hard" would we? We wouldn't have things like abortions, that I just read about in another forum. You wouldn't read about people struggling with weight and diet issues because we evolved.
You might think that happened because we did it to ourselves by bringing in processed food. It's a good point but you have to realize there is a greater question behind that too. Why did we start making processed food to begin with.
It's because there are things that are lacking in our INTENDED diet. Probably not on this planet, and we are trying to substituit them with what we do have. But remember we are evolving right?
We aren't evolving here people. We are rejecting, and trying to adapt because we are failing at evolving. I know I have brought some of this up in the past, but I think some people still missed it.
Look at how we wear shoes and socks. If we had evolved, our feet would have morphed into accepting the terrain so that walking barefoot would have been normal.
However we failed to evolve so we had to adapt by making shoes and socks.
Social stigmas influence our parenting roles which I think is evil. Kids can be seperated from one parent which is unfair to the child. We failed to evolve so we adopted these social issues as the only way to adapt.
If we had actually evolved we would have morphed into a marsupial to make sure our kids are taken care of they way they need to be, instead we harvested a gross amount of laws and rules to work around the kids. We had to adapt and had no choice because that pouch or leash was never going to evolve into existance.
Our diet is so out of hand.
Some might think its because of all the poor choices that are being made. I agree both in the creation of most foods and user error. The problem that might be missed here is why this all happened to begin with. We have become so fasinated with adapting because its all that we do here, so we do it to our food too.
So think about this the next time your faced with a problem, do you just sit there and accept it the way it is and hope that evolution will kick in on a molecular level, or do you adapt to overcome the problem?
No one to this day has explained to me why we are the only species here on earth that wears clothing. I know in the bible it was first mentioned when Adam and Eve first appear naked and were asked do they not feel ashamed. It was a social cue being intorduced to the aleged first people here. Which makes no sense. This means that Adam and Eve Were NOT the first ever because they should have never have anything to be ashamed of.
There was life before Adam and Eve which once again suggests we aren't from here, Or they mixed with an existing species. Evolution is never mentioned in the bible, and if evolution is so possible why was it never brought up in biblical times. Why was there never a bible written for evolution. Why does it seem like we are missing trillions of years of changes required to make it possible. Honestly I don't see us being able to evolve to what we are today from primates in less than 4 billion years.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Originally posted by steveknows
Originally posted by TheBar
I like to use the evidence i have at hand(literally) that helps back up and prove the primate theory.
Simply move your hand down your back until you reach a bone just just above and between your buttocks. You should be able to feel the Coccyx.
Evolution debunkers care to explain this to me ?edit on 9-11-2011 by TheBar because: (no reason given)
And saying that. Those who don't believe we're a primate might want to feel that coccyx with their opposable thumb. Opposable thumbs are a signature feature of the primate family ->
In all honesty, not that I buy this but these two examples have to be by far the best I have ever read. Kudos to you man, and if our DNA wasnt so hacked up right now, I would be totally stumped and have to agree with you. Not so much on the opposable thumb but on the missing tail.
Evolutionists really win on the tail, not that Im convinced. I wonder if in our intended design maybe we actually have tails. I do remember seeing something on TV saying that in our early stage of development, we actually have a tail that can be seen.edit on 9-11-2011 by itsthetooth because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MentorsRiddle
Barcs.... Wow you respond like a child.
Please read my words. I said I beleive, which implies that I am not certain. When I read something of interest I do not jot down where I read it.
Like I said it was years ago, not hours. Please be more intelligent when you post, and do not post like a little boy.
Get over yourself - people like you make this community a bad place to talk. I was not talking to you, but replying to another person.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Your not undersatnding.
It makes no sense that we are evolving to get worse.
Is evolving to get worse or get better, or does it not matter.
What I read and understood from wikipedia is that changes would happen as needed.
Why are we needing to further ourselves from being cohabitants of this planet?
Originally posted by Varemia
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Your not undersatnding.
It makes no sense that we are evolving to get worse.
Is evolving to get worse or get better, or does it not matter.
What I read and understood from wikipedia is that changes would happen as needed.
Why are we needing to further ourselves from being cohabitants of this planet?
Are you serious? 90% of all species that have ever existed on the planet are extinct. Evolution is not about getting better. It is simply gene frequency changes over time. If we change in a way that is detrimental to our survival, then we will die. At the moment, we reproduce fast enough with enough health to get over 7 billion strong. I'd say that's a successful species if there ever was one.
I think that's the biggest misconception about evolution. It does not mean better. It means changed.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Originally posted by Varemia
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Your not undersatnding.
It makes no sense that we are evolving to get worse.
Is evolving to get worse or get better, or does it not matter.
What I read and understood from wikipedia is that changes would happen as needed.
Why are we needing to further ourselves from being cohabitants of this planet?
Are you serious? 90% of all species that have ever existed on the planet are extinct. Evolution is not about getting better. It is simply gene frequency changes over time. If we change in a way that is detrimental to our survival, then we will die. At the moment, we reproduce fast enough with enough health to get over 7 billion strong. I'd say that's a successful species if there ever was one.
I think that's the biggest misconception about evolution. It does not mean better. It means changed.
If that were true we would see early signs of molecular change happening in at least one of the 5 million species here on earth, and we don't.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Originally posted by Varemia
reply to post by itsthetooth
I do not count the Bible as a source. It is no more an authority than a modern day fairy tale or fantasy novel. It is a collection of different beliefs construed to appear as if it were one. It also has no bearing on science, as has been proven in the past as the church has vigorously defended the Bible science, only to be proven wrong, time and time again.
If you think the whole idea of us having disabled powers sounds weird, here is a list of good reasons why...
There are seven reasons that suggest we have disabled powers.
1. In my over thirty years studying the supernatural and paranormal, I always thought it was odd that reports about other life that visits us, seems to always have special powers, and we don’t. Looking at this from the commonality of life, we appear to be missing some abilities.
2. There are multiple suggestions in the bible that also concur with us having ability’s removed from us, as a form of punishment. One of which is telepathy, and another called perceive. There might be others missing as well.
3. Vestigial organs are present in the human species, and could be part of some or our disabled ability’s.
4. Only using 10% of our brain, or at least 10% of it’s capability, means we are missing 90% of it’s function.
5. The size of our head is not average by comparison to other life here on earth. In comparison to our body size, our head exceeds the compared percentage by anything else here on earth.
6. Lloyd Pye reveals DNA findings that could also support the idea of us having disabled powers. The first is that our DNA has been tampered with, and the second is the inverted sections, the third is the dormant unrecognizable sections.
7. Heightened remaining senses. We are the only species that has sex for enjoyment, as just an example. There are many things about are existing senses that could be overly sensitive as a result of missing ability’s.
While I have no proof that this is exactly what has happened, I also can't prove that monkeys can't fly. If some or all of these sound a little to hard to swallow I guess we can all just agree that they are one big fat coincedence.
Originally posted by Varemia
You still haven't answered me. I was asking where this translation came from, and if anyone else has translated it that way. If only one man sees it as such, then perhaps there is another, more logical explanation?
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by bottleslingguy
Of course there's particles in the air, but nothing suggests gold is in any way crucial for life as we know it. And as has been mentioned multiple times before, there's tons of places in the universe with more abundant gold deposits. Lastly, it's of course silly to claim humans were made to dig for gold by an alien race that's advanced enough to travel soooooooooooo many light years. It's a complete nonsense hypothesis that has ZERO rationality or logic behind it.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by itsthetooth
Humans have evolved just like all life forms...but of course there's always a struggle against nature. Overall, nature's stronger and it's a constant battle for survival. Just look at all the viruses and bacteria that are deadly to us.
Also, since the environment is constantly changing, so do life forms. The problem is, that evolution lags behind environmental change. It's not as if temperatures rises 15 degree Celcius, the very next generation of animals suddenly features less fur
That's why there's always a struggle. It doesn't invalidate evolution, it just means there's a lag between environmental changes and the evolution of life forms. And given the complexity of evolution, that shouldn't really come as a surprise.