It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Ya it was so massive that we seem to be missing all of the massive amounts of proof, like bones and fossils. WHERE ARE THE BODYS ?????????????????
We can't even link what few finds of aleged transistion. Something is not working here. Not to mention that our overall presence here on earth went from living harmoniously in the wild to simply not fitting in.
Again, if we evolved, we DE-EVOLVED. We were better off as primates for sure. Look at how sickly we are. We can't even live past puberty without medical intervention, but we evolved right.
Honestly the ONLY positive think I can thing of thats come out of our aleged evolving is we are no longer part of any food chain. In fact we aren't part of anything.
Get a clue people, just like it says in Hebrews in the bible "Earth is not our home"...
gspcsermons.blogspot.com...edit on 8-11-2011 by itsthetooth because: k
Originally posted by MentorsRiddle
reply to post by Nosred
To compare gravity and evolution is silly....
These are both two different concepts.
We can see the effects of gravity in our life - feel it, measure it....
You can not see this with evolution - and I will argue every point you bring forward.
"Evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts do not go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's, but apples did not suspend themselves in mid-air, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape-like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
Ya it was so massive that we seem to be missing all of the massive amounts of proof, like bones and fossils. WHERE ARE THE BODYS ?????????????????
Originally posted by TamtammyMacx
Parts of the evolution theory seem credible like mutations , heredity, within a species. One species evolving into another seems unlikely without intervention. Also, how does evolution describe the split between animal organisms and plant life?
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
Originally posted by TamtammyMacx
Parts of the evolution theory seem credible like mutations , heredity, within a species. One species evolving into another seems unlikely without intervention. Also, how does evolution describe the split between animal organisms and plant life?
right????
there are too many important things that don't fit. Intervention is the simplest answer.
So far science says 10% of the planets we discover in other solar systems could harbor life. That translates to greater odds of us being seeded here by older, much more technologically advanced species than evolving from slime. The universe is most likely teeming with life that we have no way of detecting. poor us!!!
We know oil is a huge culprit, so why can't we focus on other forms of energy production that don't threaten disaster? Isn't science up to the challenge? How long do we have to hear that solar is too expensive compared to oil? Who has control over that? me or you? No matter how much science we use it is no match for the big oil companies. They either buy your patents or worse. Science absolutely has no conscience and apparently neither do the people who control it.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
Originally posted by TamtammyMacx
Parts of the evolution theory seem credible like mutations , heredity, within a species. One species evolving into another seems unlikely without intervention. Also, how does evolution describe the split between animal organisms and plant life?
right????
there are too many important things that don't fit. Intervention is the simplest answer.
So far science says 10% of the planets we discover in other solar systems could harbor life. That translates to greater odds of us being seeded here by older, much more technologically advanced species than evolving from slime. The universe is most likely teeming with life that we have no way of detecting. poor us!!!
Exactly right. We are so behind the times. Take a look at sodom and gamora in the bible. That was an atomic bomb. If aliens had atomic bombs back in biblical times, imagine what they have today. Occam's razor would suggest that intervention is the correct answer ... en.wikipedia.org...'s_razoredit on 8-11-2011 by itsthetooth because: (no reason given)edit on 8-11-2011 by itsthetooth because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by iterationzero
reply to post by itsthetooth
If this is true then how can you say you have proof if proof melts away like that.
I'm questioning the site you gave because they had this article next to the one you directed me too...
How to make anything invisible
Cars, buildings, spacecraft and you!
All of which I believe in, but not that we have this technology yet.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
Originally posted by TamtammyMacx
Parts of the evolution theory seem credible like mutations , heredity, within a species. One species evolving into another seems unlikely without intervention. Also, how does evolution describe the split between animal organisms and plant life?
right????
there are too many important things that don't fit. Intervention is the simplest answer.
So far science says 10% of the planets we discover in other solar systems could harbor life. That translates to greater odds of us being seeded here by older, much more technologically advanced species than evolving from slime. The universe is most likely teeming with life that we have no way of detecting. poor us!!!
Exactly right. We are so behind the times. Take a look at sodom and gamora in the bible. That was an atomic bomb. If aliens had atomic bombs back in biblical times, imagine what they have today. Occam's razor would suggest that intervention is the correct answer ... en.wikipedia.org...'s_razoredit on 8-11-2011 by itsthetooth because: (no reason given)edit on 8-11-2011 by itsthetooth because: (no reason given)
Zero proof for an atomic bomb...but let's state is as fact anyway. Who cares about facts anyway, right?
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by itsthetooth
Just to make this perfectly clear: The bible is only proof of what people believed in hundreds of years ago given their limited amount of knowledge. It doesn't represent reality for crying out loud
So if you post links like this, all you're showing is that your knowledge essentially stops somewhere around the 14th century...and anything beyond that is off limits if it goes against your faith. That's LUDACRIS, CRAZY, AND BEYOND IGNORANT OF FACTS.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by itsthetooth
Just to make this perfectly clear: The bible is only proof of what people believed in hundreds of years ago given their limited amount of knowledge. It doesn't represent reality for crying out loud
So if you post links like this, all you're showing is that your knowledge essentially stops somewhere around the 14th century...and anything beyond that is off limits if it goes against your faith. That's LUDACRIS, CRAZY, AND BEYOND IGNORANT OF FACTS.
Only because you think we evolved from slime.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by itsthetooth
Do you believe the bible is 100% correct? Because if you do, I can show you at least 10 things that are DEMONSTRABLY wrong...and I'm talking about major flaws, not some minor things