It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'll guarantee the people who claim to have debunked Sitchin either never read anything he's written or have read the material and are now in some existentialistic panic because their whole conceptual framework is a joke, so they do everything in their power to discredit him.
They even slander him posthumously.
I got to you with that "wasted life" thing didn't I?
IZ the evidence is all around you.
I'm not the one with rational myopathy.
Wasted because it hasn't helped bring the human condition to any better state than we were in during the dark ages.
We might be a little cleaner hygienically but even that is most likely causing us more harm than good.
Why hasn't science led to more peace and prosperity for people globally?
You'll blame it on the people wielding the political power who use the most cutting edge science and if you do you'll be making my point for me.
Science is only as good as the people who control it.
Science as a pursuit of knowledge is fine but surely you're not proud of the feeble accomplishments from the last hundred years or so are you?
What if Tesla's work wasn't confiscated and hoarded by the American govt? Or squelched and stolen by greedy bastards like Edison and Westinghaus?
You can't tell me (well you can but if you do you are pretty dumb) that science has hit a brick wall and can't give us better than what we got. You shouldn't be so proud
This is not a game of chess or a chemistry experiment.
Science is at a wall right now.
Where can it go from here?
Physics is at the point (well it has been for a while now) where it can't really explain a lot of the things that are happening in reality with the OBJECTIVE PROOF seal of approval.
So its got to jump off the page at some point and the resistance is about as annoying as the moron who can't decide whether or not to jump in the pool because it might be cold.
Bottom line the people controlling it (ie paying the bills) are only sharing a sample with everyday you and me.
Well it DOES work to your benefit and I would add you have a motive for bias against things outside the main stream cadre.
Don't patronize me about how rapidly science is advancing.
I don't doubt for one minute there are people who benefit very nicely about keeping the level of publicly available technology low. They throw out bones compared to the potential.
I wouldn't consider anything that science develops that doesn't have to do with keeping the planet clean and making people healthier and happier to be anything worthy of scientific pursuit. Why is science so toxic and anti life?
What good is science if all its byproducts are harmful?
The Annunaki seem like some pretty cool dudes all except for the making us fight over their silly feuds stuff.
I'd like to get a little of that non-polluting zero-point energy technology and see where science can go. I don't get the reluctance.
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
It appears that there is some kind of mechanism going on within the various species but how one crosses over into the other is not clear. My bringing the Sumerians up has to do with my thoughts on where modern humans come from and why we so apparently don't fit in any niche ( it also answers the riddles posed by the global megalithic creations). The Sumerians talk about tampering with dna and just because they used names like "celestial abode" does not mean they were talking about illusions. I'll guarantee the people who claim to have debunked Sitchin either never read anything he's written or have read the material and are now in some existentialistic panic because their whole conceptual framework is a joke, so they do everything in their power to discredit him. They even slander him posthumously.
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
reply to post by itsthetooth
My god doesn't believe in punishment
Why is science so toxic and anti life?
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
reply to post by iterationzero
Well it DOES work to your benefit and I would add you have a motive for bias against things outside the main stream cadre. Don't patronize me about how rapidly science is advancing. I don't doubt for one minute there are people who benefit very nicely about keeping the level of publicly available technology low. They throw out bones compared to the potential. I wouldn't consider anything that science develops that doesn't have to do with keeping the planet clean and making people healthier and happier to be anything worthy of scientific pursuit. Why is science so toxic and anti life? What good is science if all its byproducts are harmful?
The Annunaki seem like some pretty cool dudes all except for the making us fight over their silly feuds stuff. I'd like to get a little of that non-polluting zero-point energy technology and see where science can go. I don't get the reluctance.
Not me, all the authors I refer to are listed as NON FICTION writers.
So I'm not sure what your trying to get at when all I'm able to find on evolution is either in debate or inconclusive. I would seriously love to see anything about evolution that does not have the words in debate, inconclusive, unsure, etc….
Originally posted by BlackSatinDancer
can anyone name another animal that turned into a completely different species?
why can't some consider, just for a moment, how crazy that actually is.
Originally posted by colin42
Originally posted by BlackSatinDancer
can anyone name another animal that turned into a completely different species?
why can't some consider, just for a moment, how crazy that actually is.
What do you mean by one animal that turned into another?