It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The environment may move towards a balance but can never reach it.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by mastermindkar
Have things on this planet ever been in a "correct balance?" If so, when? If we wipe out all life on the planet, we would still have inflicted a fraction of the extinctions that have occured naturally.
Every planet is suppose to be in a good balance. When you see extinctions, its a real good indication that things are really screwed up. At one time long ago, earth was in balance, and it was probably way back when the diansours roamed the earth. It's open for debate I guess but it would appear that someone has eraticated a lot of life on this planet for unknown reasons, just to colonize this planet. Thats what it looks like.
Stil doesn't explain why you choose to ignore my definitions.
So you ignored the post from mindkar. You cannot give a definition for a word already defined such as natural. To think that you can means you are more foolish and poorly educated than you appear.
Oh well then here it is again.
Don’t play that game with me. You never supplied the link you supposedly quoted from. You have demonstrated that you know full well how to do it and why.
Why do you lie so much, I have done nothing for about 300 pages but cram definitions on the thread, just for you to say not accepted.
More dishonesty from old wooden headed Pinocchio. You were asked many times to supply the definitions. You refused. You were invited to debate their use. You refused. You had your chances, in fact excessive chances but you chose to be dishonest even pretending you did not make them up. Your terms are not accepted on this thread.
Well if that isn't the pot calling the kettle black.
Sadder still to see how deceitful you are prepared to be to defend your homemade religion to people who don’t give a hoot about it. Never will.
No actually the google search offers an edited version at first, and thats what I copied.
Ah so you have forgotten how to link again. Supplied a link to google again. So you lied about quoting from the link. You cherry picked from it at best. So supplying a link to google is failing 4 times. Pathetic Pinocchio
As I explained, I'm on the fence about it. When you see animals engaging in such desperate activity, its suspicious at least. There is no proof that he should not be a preditor, he is equiped to do so, so odds are against me as he appears to be in his line of work It's the desperation part that strikes up a red flag, but I could be wrong like I said.
You never answered again. You must have more than just your opinion on why you think a lion whether created or evolved are 'not' meant to be predators
What about the tape worm?
No one mentioned lice. We were talking about the tape worm not you
Other people have tried, you just seem to be inept.
No one has come up with a unicorn either because its a nonsense just like your term. Telling me to show you a target food to prove you wrong is like asking me to provide a unicorn to show they do not exist.
You are completely gone mate. You need to go get some help and you will not get it here
Exactly, and being in our 6th largest extinction right now is why. The planet can't reach a balance when its so far off.
The environment may move towards a balance but can never reach it.
It was a matter of semantics and wording, and I know it doesn't cause chaos, but it also depends on how you look at the overall picture, to call it that.
You have been shown this, had this explained and been given the links. Your only answer has been your opinion and exposed that you think theories like the chaos theory causes chaos.
That is becasue it is a crude example of a balanced globe. As you should understand, many things are depending on many other things, so its almost impossible to make a balanced globe out of just a few species. It was the example howeer that I think you totally missed. The example was supppose to explain how things are in a delicate balance, it doesn't matter that you were able to find out they are actually in more of a delicate balance then the globe protected, the end result was the same, you understood that the shrimp was tortured as a result of missing other things. So a man made balanced globe is close to impossible, but this one is just for novelty purposes.
Oh and who can forget what you claimed to be a fish and a plant in a sealed Globe as an example of a balanced system that turned out to be a red Hawaiian shrimp and algae. The sealed globe is a torture chamber for the shrimp which has a life expectancy of 25 years reduced to 18 months to 2 years where it is poisoned by its own waste and consumes its own body from hunger.
Thats a crock and you know it. The fact is if evolution were identifiable we would be hearing things from scientists where they would be able to tell us that so and so used to be this species and we confirmed that he evolved into this species, or that they isolated the gene sequence that allowed evolution to take place. The only thing evolution has is conjecture. Speciation has been witnesses in limited situations but that in itself is not proof that these changes are happening becasue of evolution. Again we would be hearing from scientists that evolution was witnessed today, and we never hear that.
The fact that after all that you still blindly accept something that only can exist in a hypothetical world but reject evolution that has overwhelming evidence, is observable and repeatable in this world says all I need to know about you. A deluded fantasist
Thats very sweet.
Your bible say's let he without sin throw the first stone. You have not got the stones to win here either. Do you really want to enter that again?
Because target food disproves evolution in case you have missed that tid bit.
Why are we still discussing "target food", a word tooth MADE UP and a word that has NOTHING to do with evolution?
Because target food disproves evolution in case you have missed that tid bit.
Target food is an ideal theory, and it doesn't need a plethora of supporting theories like evolution does.
Made up words with a made up arbitrary definition you pulled out of your ass can't disprove evolution...or any other scientific theory in general
Are all your replies going to be this pathetic? What am I saying; they have all been so far so why change.
Stil doesn't explain why you choose to ignore my definitions.
Why you think giving me a link to google is clever I don’t know. Are you that proud of your dishonesty you want to advertise it further?
Oh well then here it is again.
I have never seen a definition from you Pinocchio by I have seen hundreds of lies. Your reply above just adds to that total.
Why do you lie so much, I have done nothing for about 300 pages but cram definitions on the thread, just for you to say not accepted.
You failed to supply the link to your source 7 times now what are you hiding?
No actually the google search offers an edited version at first, and thats what I copied.
Oh you are hiding the fact you cherry picked what supported you and try to suppressed what did not. Guess what that is. DISHONESTY. Your one and only answer.
And even if I did cherry pick from a definition, its still part of the definition. You just like stretching things on your side a tad to much.
So as usual you make a really stupid statement based on the complete reverse of not only what we can observe in nature but also the whole cat family just to support your infantile fantasy. Jeeze you need help.
As I explained, I'm on the fence about it. When you see animals engaging in such desperate activity, its suspicious at least. There is no proof that he should not be a preditor, he is equiped to do so, so odds are against me as he appears to be in his line of work It's the desperation part that strikes up a red flag, but I could be wrong like I said.
What other people have tried? How is that an asnwer to my point. Try again;
Other people have tried, you just seem to be inept.
No one is able to still come up with target food for humans, but I'm trashed, OK.
What do you mean by exactly? What followed has nothing to do with the point I made as usual and as usual is based on your opinion which is worse than basing something on nothing.
Exactly, and being in our 6th largest extinction right now is why. The planet can't reach a balance when its so far off.
Nope. Its a torture chamber for the shrimp.
That is becasue it is a crude example of a balanced globe.
Strangely you argued for pages that is was a balanced system. Does this mean you actually learnt something
As you should understand, many things are depending on many other things, so its almost impossible to make a balanced globe out of just a few species.
An example of what? Torture
It was the example howeer that I think you totally missed.
Silly me. I thought you had finally tried honesty then I read the above .
The example was supppose to explain how things are in a delicate balance, it doesn't matter that you were able to find out they are actually in more of a delicate balance then the globe protected, the end result was the same, you understood that the shrimp was tortured as a result of missing other things. So a man made balanced globe is close to impossible, but this one is just for novelty purposes.
Knock Knock ......... Any one there?
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
Target food is an ideal theory, and it doesn't need a plethora of supporting theories like evolution does.
Made up words with a made up arbitrary definition you pulled out of your ass can't disprove evolution...or any other scientific theory in general
The best part is that its everywhere all around us and is easily provable unlike evolution.
In addition it puts evolution in its place. Evolution can't exist if we are all suppose to have target food, its just not possible. And to think that its ok for a new species to not have anything to eat is BAT CRAZY.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
Target food is an ideal theory, and it doesn't need a plethora of supporting theories like evolution does.
Made up words with a made up arbitrary definition you pulled out of your ass can't disprove evolution...or any other scientific theory in general
The best part is that its everywhere all around us and is easily provable unlike evolution.
In addition it puts evolution in its place. Evolution can't exist if we are all suppose to have target food, its just not possible. And to think that its ok for a new species to not have anything to eat is BAT CRAZY.
What has been so far, what are you talking about? Your replies? Pathetic yes.
Are all your replies going to be this pathetic? What am I saying; they have all been so far so why change.
I gave a link to a google definition.
Why you think giving me a link to google is clever I don’t know. Are you that proud of your dishonesty you want to advertise it further?
Now I know your lying because I purposly posted one in an external quote and you acknowledged it.
I have never seen a definition from you Pinocchio by I have seen hundreds of lies. Your reply above just adds to that total.
You failed to supply the link to your source 7 times now what are you hiding?
What are you talking about, what did I cherry pick?
Oh you are hiding the fact you cherry picked what supported you and try to suppressed what did not. Guess what that is. DISHONESTY. Your one and only answer.
Which is why I said I'm on the fence about it.
So as usual you make a really stupid statement based on the complete reverse of not only what we can observe in nature but also the whole cat family just to support your infantile fantasy. Jeeze you need help.
At least other people on this thread have tried to come up with target food.
What other people have tried? How is that an asnwer to my point. Try again;
I wasn't asking about unicorns and there is no comparison, Target food is very real.
No one has come up with a unicorn either because its a nonsense just like your term. Telling me to show you a target food to prove you wrong is like asking me to provide a unicorn to show they do not exist.
I don't know what to tell you man, I'm just commenting on your reply.
What do you mean by exactly? What followed has nothing to do with the point I made as usual and as usual is based on your opinion which is worse than basing something on nothing.
This is a perfect example of how your living in your deluded mind. I doubt very seriously if they intentionally created a torture chamber for shrimp. It makes me wonder, what was the purpose? Oh ya to create a sealed eco system.
Nope. Its a torture chamber for the shrimp.
You mean learned, and throwing in the word eco only means that it's ecological or enviromental, which it is. DUH!
Strangely you argued for pages that is was a balanced system. Does this mean you actually learnt something
They aren't advertised or explained as torture chambers, they are in fact sold as balanced eco systems. So your wrong, you always were wrond, get over it and move on.
An example of what? Torture
And they are still selling them as such, which again means your wrong, in addition to the fact that people buy them as such, so your wrong, move on get over it.
Silly me. I thought you had finally tried honesty then I read the above .
How fake are you? You offered the 'fish and plant in a sealed globe' as an example of a balanced system. Maintained the proof was the manufacturer said so. I spent pages showing you how wrong you were and now you try that full on lie above. You have no pride, self respect or any concept of honesty.
What followed was your usual trash opinion no reason to reply.
You must be seriously lacking some deduction skills as its been made clear that I have been in college. Now you can't get into college unless you complete school, so this should seriously be a no brainer. However it doesn't shock me, and if you used the same common sense with evolution, I can totally see how you buy into it.
Tooth, I have to ask...did you finish high school? I'm not asking this as an attack, but if your argument is that it's perfectly ok to make up random words and definitions, then I seriously question your education level. If you don't see that making up random words is laughable, I'm not sure people should take you seriously.
You're essentially doing this:
Gravity is wrong!!! It's wrong because of pixie dust. If gravity were real, there would be glowing pixie dust, but there is none!!
Oh come on! I think you can give tooth a little more credit.
He would try to make it sound like he actually knows what he's talking about.
Example:
Gravity is wrong!!! If gravity were real, we would see redundant anti gravity.
This has given the false idea that gravity is normal, when its NOT.
I see so because ATS wont allow the reposting of the google links, I'm lying or hiding something.
All you have done is supply more lies, another link to google front page (8 times now) and denial to avoid answering.
You and your post have been dismissed as you desreve to be.
Nope. Your avoiding answering. Your usual tactic.
I don't know what to tell you man, I'm just commenting on your reply.
(you’re not your) How come all your perfect examples are based on nothing but your deluded, simple minded opinions?
This is a perfect example of how your living in your deluded mind. I doubt very seriously if they intentionally created a torture chamber for shrimp.
(Yes not ya)I notice you have missed out balanced. You claimed it to be an example of a balanced eco system.
It makes me wonder, what was the purpose? Oh ya to create a sealed eco system.
no I meant Learnt
You mean learned,
Told you before if you are going to pull someone on spelling or grammar you had best get it right. Your face must be really red.
verb
a simple past tense and past participle of learn.
( Wrong not wrond)Nope. You’re wrong. I proved with supporting evidence the sealed globe was far from a balanced eco system.
They aren't advertised or explained as torture chambers, they are in fact sold as balanced eco systems. So your wrong, you always were wrond, get over it and move on
(You’re not your) We went through this before. People sell lots of things they should not. Gullible people like you believe them.
And they are still selling them as such, which again means your wrong, in addition to the fact that people buy them as such, so your wrong, move on get over it.
(You’re not your and wrong not wrond)With the one you should be answering:
They aren't advertised or explained as torture chambers, they are in fact sold as balanced eco systems. So your wrong, you always were wrond, get over it and move on
(Suppose not supppose) Here you maintain a man made balanced globe is impossible. You also imply it was to show me that a balanced eco system in a sealed globe was impossible.
The example was supppose to explain how things are in a delicate balance, it doesn't matter that you were able to find out they are actually in more of a delicate balance then the globe protected, the end result was the same, you understood that the shrimp was tortured as a result of missing other things. So a man made balanced globe is close to impossible, but this one is just for novelty purposes.
(Deserve not desereve and probably not proably)Nope I just expect you to be honest. Well I used too. I know accept you never will be. ATS is not blocking, you are to avoid showing YOUR lie.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by colin42
I see so because ATS wont allow the reposting of the google links, I'm lying or hiding something.
All you have done is supply more lies, another link to google front page (8 times now) and denial to avoid answering.
You and your post have been dismissed as you desreve to be.
If you spent the same quality analysis on evolution, you would proably pick a different religion.