It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Dont forget that while all that is going on, we had to of also been getting a lot of other changes as well. For example the changes in our hair, our tail bone, our skin and features, four times the brain matter, .
Thanks Bunny That's pretty interesting actually. So the only part Tooth was actually right about was that this was discovered. Finally somebody has given evidence of a part of the human that has rapidly evolved. I've been looking for that for the longest time. So by rapidly, how rapidly are we talking, the 7 or so million years since we split from Chimps, or is this a more recent change effecting just the homo genus? I couldn't find that info in any of abstracts I was reading
Yes I have multiple times. I keep saying that it could have just as easily of been a creator that explains diversity, from using recycled parts.
Agreed. Yeah it seems like the topic change is what killed this thread. Perhaps it may be best to create another one with the actual intended title, because all this thread does is attract the extreme folks and bible literalists, rather than anybody coming up with an alternative to evolution. Instead it's just people going back and forth over terminology and technicalities and people trying to post anti-evolution rhetoric, which isn't even the purpose. That tooth guy has been going for 200 pages on intervention theory, but hasn't once actually addressed the topic. Ah well, it was entertaining while it lasted
You obviously missed some pages. The parts I'm referring to is to many to list but for starters, you could understand that most of genesis is an ideal example of an abduction taking place. The Ezekiel chapter clearly explains a UFO falling from the sky as god is about to visit. Hebrews clearly states that EART IS NOT OUR HOME multiple times, and goes as far as talking about other planets and aliens.
Show me. And by show me, I mean this, exactly:
1- Please write what parts of the Bible you are referring to.
2- Please explain why those parts have anything to do with intervention.
3- Please explain what you mean by "clear documentation."
4- Please, tell us
Ya so what about it? there is nothing spectacular here that a creator couldn't create.
Animals / Humans USE OXYGEN, and PRODUCE Carbon Dioxide.
Plants USE Carbon Dioxide, and PRODUCE OXYGEN.
Well quite simply that there is no way we could share a common ancestor with apes if we aren't from here. This is what I have been going on about over 300 pages, things that prove we aren't from here, and there is just evidence hand over fist about it. Much of the unbelievable parts of the bible could be explained from Extra Terrestrial intervention. Not that its just easy to say that aliens are to blame but from what little we do know about them, they are like crazy ahead of us in the technology and science fields.
I understand and agree that if reading the Bible, it completely sounds like God = Aliens (or Alien), literally.
A while ago I read parts of the Bible, just to research Creationist claims. I thought I was reading science fiction, as early on it became extremely apparent that "God" = "Alien" (or specifically, someone not of this Earth..
Not of this Earth
Yet, what proof does this highly edited collection of ancient books written by unknown authors carry towards Evolution?
No we are surviving. When we stop doing that for any reason we become extinct.
We are not in evolution. We are in extinction.
Of course when you see a species disapear thats extinction
When you reduce 70 phyla to 30, that is extinction.
When you see species disappearing around you in real time, that is extinction.
Why? The number of species is was and will be limited by the number of niches available. More variety within the species? You dont think we see massive diversity? You have not even explained the diversity we see how do you explain the lack of what you think should be more?
Evolution would be the opposite. More phyla evolving. More varieties in species. More because evolution depends on time, and time provides more possibilities.
You know your list is way too low. Your assumption that they were fit to survive is obviously flawed as they did not. You also make no mention of all the animals that took their place.
Evolution depends on survival of the fittest. 40 phyla that do not exist today were totally fit to survive.
I see another 'lets hate the human' club member
They did it for millions of years. Something eliminated them. Based on what I see today, it probably had something to do with the advent of human beings.
Yep, definitely an anti human club member. Many things could have happened. Earth quakes, tsunami's, disease, starvation. Why have you lept on killed by the bigger boys?
When you look at the fossil record, you see varieties of human beings that no longer exist; e.g., the "hobbit" people. Why are they gone? Likely larger humans killed them.
And this means?
Where is the dodo bird? The carrier pidgeon? Killed by humans.
No one has ever called it evolution and yes lots of varieties are extinct, more than what survive today. Please explain that without refering to evolution.
Call it evolution all you want, but they are gone. There were a lot of different varieties of life on this planet. Gone.
That is not evolution. That, my friend, is extinction.
Now, about the Japanese nuclear reactor that could kill all life on Earth....is that evolution, too?
What tosh. Evolution explains extinction and diversity and how life evolves. The model more than fits.
Evolution is wrong because it does not fit the model of what has happened on Earth. Extinction does.
Go look at all the other posts where this is shown to be hogwash not a site promoting it.
Explain out of place artifacts (google OOPARTS). Explain human and dinosaur footprints. Explain human footprints over 2 million years old. Evolution does not fit the model, folks. Don't drink that KoolAid.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by Barcs
What in the world could evolution possibly claim about extinctions?
FYI, extinction is one of the biggest parts of evolution.
I think only man would have a system that suceeds, by failing.
Creatures that can't survive, and have less favorable mutations in their genes die out. Without extinction, evolution is moot. What exactly do you think natural selection is? Creatures compete and the better adapted ones survive while the others either move to a new environment or die out. The fact that humans have caused extinctions shows humans are the most well adapted creatures on the planet. Do you realize that humans are not the only ones to cause other creatures extinctions? That's the way the world has worked for billions of years. It's survival of the fittest and humans are by far, the smartest which makes them the most fit for our environment