It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by iterationzero
I'll be awaiting your example of a theory that became a law.
Originally posted by rhinoceros
Originally posted by iterationzero
I'll be awaiting your example of a theory that became a law.
In science, theory is greater than a law.
Law: A statement of an order or relation of phenomena which is (so far as is known) invariable under given conditions.
• Example: Newton’s law of gravity.
• We don’t know how it works but we know that it works.
Theory: a conception, proposition or formula relating to the nature, action, cause or origin of a phenomenon,
• formed by deduction and generalisation from a set of facts.
• Thus is a fact-based, mechanistic explanation for the observed phenomenon.
• Not just an idea, notion or hypothesis.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by Barcs
Or maybe if a purple unicorn flew by.
You might get to witness the beginning of speciation in humans if some natural disaster happens and the environment suddenly changes.
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Originally posted by rhinoceros
Originally posted by iterationzero
I'll be awaiting your example of a theory that became a law.
In science, theory is greater than a law.
Law: A statement of an order or relation of phenomena which is (so far as is known) invariable under given conditions.
• Example: Newton’s law of gravity.
• We don’t know how it works but we know that it works.
Theory: a conception, proposition or formula relating to the nature, action, cause or origin of a phenomenon,
• formed by deduction and generalisation from a set of facts.
• Thus is a fact-based, mechanistic explanation for the observed phenomenon.
• Not just an idea, notion or hypothesis.
He doesn't want to understand it, he just wants to argue. It's easier to treat obnoxious children as obnoxious children then to try to reason with them
When he attacks you for trying to simplify it for him, especially the part about not knowing how it works for the laws (mathematically proven), you'll see. It's easier to just shut him down and move on.
I had to learn the hard way, but it doesn't mean everyone has to
Originally posted by Barcs
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Originally posted by rhinoceros
Originally posted by iterationzero
I'll be awaiting your example of a theory that became a law.
In science, theory is greater than a law.
Law: A statement of an order or relation of phenomena which is (so far as is known) invariable under given conditions.
• Example: Newton’s law of gravity.
• We don’t know how it works but we know that it works.
Theory: a conception, proposition or formula relating to the nature, action, cause or origin of a phenomenon,
• formed by deduction and generalisation from a set of facts.
• Thus is a fact-based, mechanistic explanation for the observed phenomenon.
• Not just an idea, notion or hypothesis.
He doesn't want to understand it, he just wants to argue. It's easier to treat obnoxious children as obnoxious children then to try to reason with them
When he attacks you for trying to simplify it for him, especially the part about not knowing how it works for the laws (mathematically proven), you'll see. It's easier to just shut him down and move on.
I had to learn the hard way, but it doesn't mean everyone has to
No offense, but you were confusing scientific terminology in your posts, then when it was corrected, you acted like you knew that all along and that you were telling us something we don't know. Most of the scientific heads on here are pretty technical about things like that, and have been dealing with Tooth for the past 200 pages, which is why you got piled on.edit on 14-5-2012 by Barcs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
I was trying to simplify it for someone who didn't appear to know much, then got slammed out of the blue is what happened... I've learned to not over simply anything without clearly stating that I'm doing so. Apparently quotation marks aren't enough :/
Originally posted by Barcs
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
I was trying to simplify it for someone who didn't appear to know much, then got slammed out of the blue is what happened... I've learned to not over simply anything without clearly stating that I'm doing so. Apparently quotation marks aren't enough :/
I think you'd understand the reaction if you read the last 10 pages or so of Tooth's posts. Yeah, generalizations probably aren't the best thing to make when describing science. People make a lot of topics here using catch phrases like "blind chance events" and all kinds of things that generalize and misunderstand science to the point its ridiculous. Science is very specific, so when explaining it, it's best to be specific unless you're trying to teach children.
Ya but does theory mean that all the connecting parts to a theory are fact or does it mean that it could contain factual parts?
In science, theory is greater than a law.
Law: A statement of an order or relation of phenomena which is (so far as is known) invariable under given conditions.
• Example: Newton’s law of gravity.
• We don’t know how it works but we know that it works.
Theory: a conception, proposition or formula relating to the nature, action, cause or origin of a phenomenon,
• formed by deduction and generalisation from a set of facts.
• Thus is a fact-based, mechanistic explanation for the observed phenomenon.
• Not just an idea, notion or hypothesis.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by Barcs
Good point Barc. Here is a specific you should try to explain. In our DNA scientists have discovered a chain of DNA that doens't match with anything else they have ever seen before. In other words we are the only ones here on earth that got this strand. It's called HAR1. They are also saying there is no way we could have evolved into having this as no one else here has it. Any clues?
Nope, you've twisted it and distorted it and I'm not playing with you.
Post.
You don't have to agree with other theories that are brought up, and you can put all your support into the one you like best and some theories are better than others, but they are still theories. They may even become "Laws" some day with enough proof, but for now, they're theories, that is, a set of possibilities supported by whatever data is pesented to support them but not proven beyond absolution.
No, you did twist and turn and you have been extremely obnoxious, childish, quarrelsome, belligerent and unwilling to listen to any explanation other than what you already have your mind set on. You are an egotistical child who just wants to argue, not discuss, not debate, not learn, not teach, just downright argue and I find you extremely offensive and irritating.
I've worked with people like you before and know there is no satiating your ego or your attitude.
I can guarantee you have a million "horror stories" of how you were soooo mistreated in school by your "evil teachers" for not giving in to your tunnel visioned whims and allowing you to monopolize all of the classtime available to satisfy your desire to hear your own voice instead of sitting down and listening for 5 minutes instead of talking.
Originally posted by iterationzero
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Great, so we agree -- scientific theories never become scientific laws because they've accumulated a particular degree of evidence. You were wrong to make that statement and you've since reversed ... oops, sorry ... corrected yourself. Glad we could get past that. I'm looking forward to your more substantive posts in this thread!