It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
back in the definition you need to add a number four, which would be the food needs to be natural. Meaning no un natural processes.
This means the leaf cutter ant has no target food. It cuts leaves, they cannot digest cellulose. Transports them back to the nest. The ant then plants, tends and grows a fungus on the leaf cuttings. Using antibiotics to control a pest that attacks its crop. The fungus is the ants source of food.
And I'm sure the ant does all this without even thinking. After all how much thought process can one ant be responsible for to begin with?
The fungus has to be grown as it is not abundant everywhere. The processes involved in growing the fungus from cutting and tansporting the leaves onwards is processing the food.
Only if its a main staple and he relys on it..
The diet of leaf-cutter ants can sometimes include seeds, fruit and cereals so making the fugus the staple diet but not the 'target food'
Which is possible that they were borth brought here, just harder to believe. Ants do share a lot of things with nature so it does make it harder to believe.
The leaf cutter ant therefore fails your target food test and so must not be from here. If the leaf cutter ant is not from here neither are all the other types of ant. Which means the anteater is not from here or of course it could mean your target food being proof of native to earth is as stupid as it sounds.
What a coincidence, the bible indicates that a lot of things were brought to earth .
Clearly, ants aren't "natural" on earth, just like humans aren't. So now we have ants and humans...I wonder how many other species are "not from earth"
I wasn't aware they had any problems finding food.
Shall we go with the honey bee.
It eats pollen but also uses pollen to produce honey that it uses as an all year round food source. It processes its food and produces honey and bees wax. that it makes honey containers with the wax we call honey combs. Not forgetting it has gathered and transported the pollen. It gathers pollen from many/any flowering plant.
Bee's also genetically manipulate their population using royal jelly as the agent.
Bees also clearly fail the target food test
With unlimited resources, unlimited money, and unlimited transport, and unlimited processing you are correct to a degree.
That's complete nonsense. You have everything on earth to eat healthy. I eat healthy and have no issues whatsoever.
Oh I totally agree, but your once again missing the point. How much additional trouble did they have to go through to feed themselves, and how much was there health compramised as a result of not having the correct food. Your totally missing the point. Again we can eat toothpaste and toilet paper but that doesn't mean it was meant for us.
The most evident proof for your argument being hogwash is that homo sapiens (and its ancestors) survived on food provided by earth just fine for 200,000 years
Well that could be a stretch but still in the correct direction. I would say the food was not up to par for sure.
You're essentially stating "we have survived 200,000 years as a species...but the food we eat isn't good for us". That's comical and crazy!!!
You had your chance to make sure your definition was correct. That you now add another clause is not a surprise but shows your dishonesty. Anyhow adding more makes little difference it fails on the original definition even if you now define what natural and unnatural food is.
back in the definition you need to add a number four, which would be the food needs to be natural. Meaning no un natural processes.
Exactly right. Not being able to digest cellulose and having to process the leaves to grow fungus means it fails your requirements automatically on two counts. It also eats other foods so it fails on ALL three counts.
The only problem with missidentifying the ants process, is that it is still natural, so its accepted. The antibiotics are not made by the ant to use. Not being able to digest cellulose simply means its not his food.
See your definition. Whether the ant thinks or not has nothing to do with your requirements.
And I'm sure the ant does all this without even thinking. After all how much thought process can one ant be responsible for to begin with?
You fail again. If the ants crops fail it lives on pretty well eating other foods as listed. It may not live in such great numbers but then neither would humans if our crops failed.
Only if its a main staple and he relys on it..
If ants were brought here so was the anteater. You see its not about belief in the end, its about proof, evidence. You have none.
Which is possible that they were borth brought here, just harder to believe. Ants do share a lot of things with nature so it does make it harder to believe.
Wasnt you? Oh well another thing the rest of the world knows that you dont. Back to the point. What do you think the Bee's target food is then?
I wasn't aware they had any problems finding food.
It was allready a definition point that was brought up before so its not like I'm just pulling it out.
You had your chance to make sure your definition was correct. That you now add another clause is not a surprise but shows your dishonesty. Anyhow adding more makes little difference it fails on the original definition even if you now define what natural and unnatural food is.
Well then its probably not a target food. And just because a species eats some off things doesn't mean I was implying they would only ever eat a target food. Your obviously missing the definition again.
Exactly right. Not being able to digest cellulose and having to process the leaves to grow fungus means it fails your requirements automatically on two counts. It also eats other foods so it fails on ALL three counts.
And its all done through natural process. Your trying to compare this with say our process of chemicals and pasturizing and fortifying of milk. I'm sorry but there is no comparison.
Your only hope now is to define unnatural food or of course you can run from the truth as usual.
Of course the ant produces the antibiotic and uses it to kill infections of its crop. Your answer is senseless drivel
Which is obviously why your failing at understanding the definition. Redundant adaptation is not natural.
See your definition. Whether the ant thinks or not has nothing to do with your requirements.
So then your example was simply not a target food.
You fail again. If the ants crops fail it lives on pretty well eating other foods as listed. It may not live in such great numbers but then neither would humans if our crops failed.
I can't think of a single reason to believe that.
If ants were brought here so was the anteater. You see its not about belief in the end, its about proof, evidence. You have none.
I haven't studied them in depth enough to make any claims but will say that I haven't heard of them having any food problems.
Wasnt you? Oh well another thing the rest of the world knows that you dont. Back to the point. What do you think the Bee's target food is then?
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
What a coincidence, the bible indicates that a lot of things were brought to earth .
Clearly, ants aren't "natural" on earth, just like humans aren't. So now we have ants and humans...I wonder how many other species are "not from earth"
Again we can eat toothpaste and toilet paper but that doesn't mean it was meant for us.
'Target food' is your invention. Are you telling me you did not know enough about it when I listed the points and asked if this is the correct definition that you forgot 'unnatural food' another invented term by you?
It was allready a definition point that was brought up before so its not like I'm just pulling it out.
If an animal did not eat its target food and ate other food then surely this is unnatural food which means they are not from here.
Well then its probably not a target food. And just because a species eats some off things doesn't mean I was implying they would only ever eat a target food. Your obviously missing the definition again.
I am not surprised you cannot define unnatural food because it does not exist. The above you gave is not a description. If I cook an apple pie it is done through natural processes. i.e. I do not make it by magic. I mix ingredients, add heat and I get an apple pie. All natural processes.
And its all done through natural process. Your trying to compare this with say our process of chemicals and pasturizing and fortifying of milk. I'm sorry but there is no comparison.
Not included in your definition or your revised definition. Stay focused as you are loosing badly.
Which is obviously why your failing at understanding the definition. Redundant adaptation is not natural.
So the leaf cutter ant has no target food. By your own requirements it is not from here. So neither are any ants which by default means the anteater is not from here.
So then your example was simply not a target food.
Again it is not about belief it is about proof. I have shown you again that the ant fails to pass your test to be considered of this planet. I see little way other than a blatent lie that you can deny this and hold your fantasy to be true.
I can't think of a single reason to believe that.
Still should not prevent you from identifying their target food as you have stated many times. Animals with target food know what it is because it is obvious.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by colin42
I haven't studied them in depth enough to make any claims but will say that I haven't heard of them having any food problems.
Wasnt you? Oh well another thing the rest of the world knows that you dont. Back to the point. What do you think the Bee's target food is then?
You do not want to believe in a God because then you might have to change your lifestyle and
follow the Creator's rules and most don't accept that at their own peril IMO.
I honestly don't know enough about them.
Still should not prevent you from identifying their target food as you have stated many times. Animals with target food know what it is because it is obvious.
What is the honey bee's target food?
Really? the hint is in the name? It is also a well covered topic with many articles and information with a simple google search.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by colin42
I honestly don't know enough about them.
Still should not prevent you from identifying their target food as you have stated many times. Animals with target food know what it is because it is obvious.
What is the honey bee's target food?
And still after all your yapping you still can't produce one target food for humans.
Clearly that's proof the bible is 100% true (even though it really isn't) and snakes can really talk. Quick, call "Science" and tell them you have an article for them
Of all my years on ATS, the "target food" argument has to be the dumbest and most ridiculous argument I ever heard. It's so easy to disprove, it's not even a real argument. The only reason you continue to believe in that nonsense is that in your mind it fits your belief...a belief not based on any logic and rationality, just like every other religion
So then what your saying by your own admission is you rely on mans ingredients lable, rather than some natural food that we should have plenty of.
And again you bring up that silly argument. Only a moron would eat toothpaste and toilet paper (or a psychologically impaired person of course). Why? Because it doesn't contain any nutrients and isn't natural food. It's not made from anything we can use as food...compared to bananas, which are prefect natural food. Some people having allergies isn't evidence that overall food on earth isn't meant for us
And still with all the ignorance, you can't produce a single target food for humans.
Look, I really don't know what to say. A child would understand that your argument is laughably flawed. Your own ignorance overrides your bain and disables your ability to think rationally and logically. It's like talking to a religious fundamentalist...no amount of logic convinces those people, they are shining beacons of ignorance
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by flyingfish
WTF does any of this have to do with us living on another planet, or learning about such an idea?
Sorry, no excuses for ignorant megalomania.
The best samples we have are from the moon the LCROSS lunar impact mission conferms a billion gallons of water ice in the floor of a crater near the moon's south pole.
Opportunity landed in Eagle Crater on Mars on Jan. 25, 2004, three weeks after its rover twin, Spirit, landed halfway around the planet. Opportunity found evidence of an ancient wet environment.
Curiosity, is slated to land on Mars on Aug. 6, 2012. Unlike earlier rovers, Curiosity carries equipment to gather samples of rocks and soil to process them.
Personally, I want to go back to Titan and Dione. Cassini detected oxygen ions in Dione's atmosphere, it begs the question, whats under that layer of water ice.
Strangely neither can you for ants. I wonder why that is?
And still after all your yapping you still can't produce one target food for humans.
Again neither can you provide one for ants or honey bee's and I note you have by-passed my post concerning ants and target food. Are you running again?
And still with all the ignorance, you can't produce a single target food for humans.
It slipped my mind, what can I say I'm not perfect. However you know I'm not making it up as I had already mentioned it.
'Target food' is your invention. Are you telling me you did not know enough about it when I listed the points and asked if this is the correct definition that you forgot 'unnatural food' another invented term by you?
Does not matter anyhow as I have said because if 'target food' needs to be all of the requirements or just one most life on this planet would have no target food.
Wrong, you pulled that out of your ass and it has nothing to do with unnatural food.
If an animal did not eat its target food and ate other food then surely this is unnatural food which means they are not from here.
Foods that are redundantly processed are not natural. If an ant for example does use chemicals, he is still doing it with a natural process, we are not.
I am not surprised you cannot define unnatural food because it does not exist. The above you gave is not a description. If I cook an apple pie it is done through natural processes. i.e. I do not make it by magic. I mix ingredients, add heat and I get an apple pie. All natural processes
It's assumed and I though you understood whats going on here.
Not included in your definition or your revised definition. Stay focused as you are loosing badly.
I don't know enough about the ant to make that assesment.
So the leaf cutter ant has no target food. By your own requirements it is not from here. So neither are any ants which by default means the anteater is not from here.
Ok I can't think of a single thing that proves that.
Again it is not about belief it is about proof. I have shown you again that the ant fails to pass your test to be considered of this planet. I see little way other than a blatent lie that you can deny this and hold your fantasy to be true.
And still after all your yapping you still can't produce one target food for humans.
So then what your saying by your own admission is you rely on mans ingredients lable, rather than some natural food that we should have plenty of.
And still with all the ignorance, you can't produce a single target food for humans.