It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by flyingfish
Well excuse me flying #, I wasn't aware you have traveled to other planets to sample the accomidations. My bad.
Originally posted by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to post by flyingfish
You know what I mean. When a majority of individuals come to accept a theory as false it is considered "proven" wrong. I was using the term in a different context in the two sentences. You are aware that every word in the english language can be used in multiple contexts eh? I forgot to add the quotations around the second one. Sue me.
Ya but with trick question I mean there is no answer for humans, as its a legit find, not that its a trick question just to trick you.
Again you decide to answer a point made without addressing the point. I said there is not such thing as target food never mentioned animals, humans, fish or plants. You even agreed as you now claim 'target food' is something you made up (what a surprise) as a trick question.
Yes I have and in fact you have allready commented on it.
Again you are not providing a definition of this moronical term 'target food' as you have been asked.
It was a long shot and even funnier how Pye is not revealing those findings for the same reason that I was looking for them.
So you admit you were looking for information to confirm your belief. Very scientific.
Well it was quite simple actually as I have studied these things for over thirty years.
You put yourself in gods shoes? who could you do that of someone your book says is the ulimate force. More importantly does god not belong if he has to wear shoes?
Well I wasn't looking for my words to cut it, I was looking for Wiki's words to cut it.
So you copy and paste the same stuff. The answer still does not cut it. You maintain that. Your words
I would ask the same of you.
Start explaining stop claiming
Your wrong because wiki would have listed speciation with animals and humans if that were the case, but rather they specifically identified what few life forms it does apply to. See your making assumptions that taking you off the deep end and its no longer making any sense. If wiki wanted this to apply to human, they would have indicated so.
It explains it happening in animals. We are animals. It expects a level of intelligence to understand it, you fall way below that level.
Actually it was my reply to your post.
My post you are responding too
Its just recently back.
Wheres the 'him'? Your reading skills have let you down again.
I have allready issued you a thourough definition, and you have allready commented on that.
Jeeze do you need a definition of what a definition is? I asked for a definition of your made up totally wrong term 'Target food' not a repeat of some meaningless drivel you have repeated time and again
Either a main staple or one that we greatly depend on.
Again the halfwits guide to life the universe and everything drawn from tooths guide to the galaxy.
So now target food has to be necessary food.? define that as well please
If this were true then our target food would still be available and scientists would know without a doubt what food is good for us without thinking about it. But they don't, and it depends on each persons needs. Diet needs vary so much from person to person that there is even a custom dietary lab program where they fit you with a specific diet.
No, it didn't go extinct (at least most of it didn't...can't speak for the Dodo though) we just need more of it because of our drastic population growth.
Well again, it would still be here if this were true, and you would have no problem producing examples of target food, which you can't.
Whereas in the past it was "ok" if some crops died a hundred years ago, given today's demand, we need to increase efficiency of food production. Pesticides are a way of doing that because less of the crops will die...and turning it into powder (like mashed potatoes) makes it easier to transport. We're doing all that because of population growth, not because the food isn't eatable in the first place :@@
Humans have been known to eat just about anything, which doesn't mean that anything is good for us.
Well, given people have been eating apples for centuries...yeah, kinda
What do you mean with "our food to begin with"??? Homo sapiens has been eating buffalos for centuries, and it's a perfectly fine food source that suits us well....how on earth is that not suitable food???
And your totally missing the fact that we rely on science to tell us what is good for us and what is not, rather than instinct which would have been the norm for choosing a target food.
I'd kinda expect you doing that...but someone LOGICAL would realize that none of those items carry any nutrients compared to food you find naturally on our planet like chickens or apples. That food is meant for us because it provides us with nutrients...whereas your stupid tooth paste doesn't.
It doesn't, and I never said that it did. What I am saying is that its obviously not OUR food.
How on earth do food allergies and diseases prove all the NATURAL food on this planet isn't natural???
Sure but what your over looking in all of this is that if we did have our correct food to begin with, it still wouldn't be a problem.
A ton of those diseases come from psychological reasons or sheer stupidity. If you eat toilet paper, you have a mental problem. If you grow fat because you eat 2 pizzas, a steak, 2 boxes of Yums, 5 Snickers, 2 loafs of bred and a supersized portion of friend KFC every single day...well...you have an eating disorder and will become fat because your calories intake is too high. Again, it's a psychological problem. Animals have allergies too, which once again provides evidence for common ancestry.
Over eating is just one stem of the problem. What do you expect you body to do when your not getting the right nutrients? Your going to overeat trying to fill that need.
Plus, you are forgetting that a lot of the issues stem from quantity rather than the food product itself. You can eat a Snickers no problem, but if you eat 10 every day you have issues This doesn't mean chocolate and caramel aren't target food, it just means you're a moron and gulping down too many Snickers every single day.
That is correct again, and its all from poor diet. I guess your still missing the point here. Our diet is suffering because the correct food is simply not there. We created a lot of processed food in an effort to fill a need for the desire of missing food. Again we are trying to fill a need though process. It's redundant adaptation.
Allergies and those diseases are perfectly explained through science, we KNOW why people get gall stones for example
WTF does any of this have to do with us living on another planet, or learning about such an idea?
Sorry, no excuses for ignorant megalomania.
The best samples we have are from the moon the LCROSS lunar impact mission conferms a billion gallons of water ice in the floor of a crater near the moon's south pole.
Opportunity landed in Eagle Crater on Mars on Jan. 25, 2004, three weeks after its rover twin, Spirit, landed halfway around the planet. Opportunity found evidence of an ancient wet environment.
Curiosity, is slated to land on Mars on Aug. 6, 2012. Unlike earlier rovers, Curiosity carries equipment to gather samples of rocks and soil to process them.
Personally, I want to go back to Titan and Dione. Cassini detected oxygen ions in Dione's atmosphere, it begs the question, whats under that layer of water ice.
Thanks so this definition is close enough
Looks close enough.
This means the leaf cutter ant has no target food. It cuts leaves, they cannot digest cellulose. Transports them back to the nest. The ant then plants, tends and grows a fungus on the leaf cuttings. Using antibiotics to control a pest that attacks its crop. The fungus is the ants source of food.
1. Abundant everywhere
2. cannot be processed in any way
3. must be essential/necessary
Tooth. Is this the complete definition of you poorly constructed term 'target food'? If not supply the 'full' definition.
Originally posted by LaborofLove
There's binary code in DNA. So many chemical elements that make up compounds, of which we are still uncovering every day. This person who runs evolution must be pretty intelligent.
Originally posted by theindependentjournal
You don't need to prove it wrong, it has never been proven correct and no evidence points to it in fact most scientists now have moved to ID.
Our diet is suffering because the correct food is simply not there.
You do not want to believe in a God because then you might have to change your lifestyle and follow the Creator's rules and most don't accept that at their own peril IMO.