It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I would agree with you except for the part that no one is fronting any missed words.
If sometimes is an answer to you being a speed reader then you need to stop. Speed reading does not mean skip text and pick out words that suit your agenda
Still funny how no one can answer them.
Well thanks for at least admitting 'target food ' is an invention by you. Now dont speed read this.
No one gives you the answer you ask for with regards to 'target food' because it is a nonsense invention that does not exist just like your version of 'natural and unnatural'. I know you use these nonsense terms to hide behind but all you do is make yourself the fool everyone has come to recognise.
True but they may not have telepathic powers still, your assuming, something you like to do a lot of.
No he quite clearly said it 'COULD' be the brain being effected by the earths magnetic field and both humans and animals have brains.
The findings are published in the NIH database you dim wit.
You say he 'Published' his article. You do know, you being a science major that is not the same as publishing his findings to the scientific community dont you?
I'll reply to parts of your post as others have ripped it apart already. It's only a trick question if it fools others. No one accepts your made up 'target food' so the only one being fooled is you, by yourself.
We have no food we could call necessity It was a trick question Only understandable if you realize the food here is not our food.
How much does the video cost?
And you notice from the title of the book it has nothing to do with human genetics, that is a separate video which has nothing to do with that book.
There are a hell of a lot of forces explained by evolution and they are backed up by evidence and the DNA/Fossil records. Why do you choose the bible and try to maintain it is not a belief?
There are forces at work in the bible that are a hell of a lot harder to believe than purple unicorns, so every time you say that, I just sort of go along with it cause its lame.
I'll repeat this as it is an important point
Of course things can be debunked, but merely claiming so doesn't automatically debunk things.
So now stop merely claiming evolution is false and back it up with evidence
Of course things can be debunked, but merely claiming so doesn't automatically debunk things.
Like I have pointed out before. Unless these people show up here they dont exist. They are more rubbish you have made up in a desperate attempt to cling onto your fantasy.
Every one I have asked, agrees we have no target food here. Colin is convinced we are home, but he also can't produce any target food.
You must be speed writing now as that above makes no sense whatsoever
I would agree with you except for the part that no one is fronting any missed words.
You find it funny, I find you pathetic. Again target food is your invention so you define its meaning.
Still funny how no one can answer them.
You are assuming that what he presented for discussion is fact which is something you do ALL the time
True but they may not have telepathic powers still, your assuming, something you like to do a lot of.
Link
The findings are published in the NIH database you dim wit.
And I allready told you the findings are public record and can be searched through NIH's data base, your a real clown.
And you're falling for Pye's nonsense again
His research hasn't been peer reviewed, and isn't listed. Don't believe me? Everyone can search the database, it's public...here's the link searching it for Lloyd Pye: LINK
It's incredibly that you so blindly believe whatever that clown says...even though it takes less than 3min to debunk his claims
Well it fooled you too Colin because I didn't see you speaking up about how its a trick question, I also didn't see you trying to come up with any target food. You got fooled twice on it.
I'll reply to parts of your post as others have ripped it apart already. It's only a trick question if it fools others. No one accepts your made up 'target food' so the only one being fooled is you, by yourself.
The video is free, just google human genetics by lloyd pye.
How much does the video cost?
I totally agree with you on this one here. There is a hell of a lot of foces explained by evoloution but I'm looking for ones that prove evolution. I think there is a difference.
There are a hell of a lot of forces explained by evolution and they are backed up by evidence and the DNA/Fossil records. Why do you choose the bible and try to maintain it is not a belief?
geez, where to start, well you could google speciation and read up on that. It clearly points out that speciation has only been witnessed in some aquatic life and viruses and bacteria, as well as some small insects. Humans are NOT part of the list, as is the rest of the planet. So people are making an assumable leap here with no evidence. Just assume assume , assume.
So now stop merely claiming evolution is false and back it up with evidence
Are you referring to yourself in the thrid person?
Like I have pointed out before. Unless these people show up here they dont exist. They are more rubbish you have made up in a desperate attempt to cling onto your fantasy.
Its quite simple actually, a target food would be plentiful no matter where we live. Would not have to be processed so it is natural, and we would depend on it to a large degree.. Like ants are to the ant eater is probably a good example.
Something you have also refused to do is provide a definition for you lame brained, made up term. At least provide that. It should be simple as it is your invention.
No one is pointing out any words I have missed from speed reading.
You must be speed writing now as that above makes no sense whatsoever
I was being sarcastic, I actually find it pathetic as well, pathetic that you aren't able to see that you lost this debate and I left you speechless with no target ideas to produce.
You find it funny, I find you pathetic. Again target food is your invention so you define its meaning.
You have it backwards but yes grass could be a target food for cows, what we don't know is if grass was brought here as well. It's a valid point, for once.
I could claim cows eat grass because their target food is not on this planet. Now provide proof that it is.
Well it is true that the title which matches with over a dozen other sites does indicate he is claiming it to be a fact.
You are assuming that what he presented for discussion is fact which is something you do ALL the time
Lnk
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
And I allready told you the findings are public record and can be searched through NIH's data base, your a real clown.
And you're falling for Pye's nonsense again
His research hasn't been peer reviewed, and isn't listed. Don't believe me? Everyone can search the database, it's public...here's the link searching it for Lloyd Pye: LINK
It's incredibly that you so blindly believe whatever that clown says...even though it takes less than 3min to debunk his claims
Yet again you delude yourself as I have always told you there is no such thing as target food as everyone else here has also. But seeing as though you now claim this to be a trick question you not only admit you have continuously lied your arguments based on target food now become defunct
Well it fooled you too Colin because I didn't see you speaking up about how its a trick question, I also didn't see you trying to come up with any target food. You got fooled twice on it.
You mean his U tube rubbish. Seen them, laughed and moved on other than that all I see on his site are books for sale including one on the star child
The video is free, just google human genetics by lloyd pye.
You dont look for the ones that prove Pye or the bible. Seems like a one sided and closed minded search but hey you are tooth.
I totally agree with you on this one here. There is a hell of a lot of foces explained by evoloution but I'm looking for ones that prove evolution. I think there is a difference.
Do you copy and paste all your responses? Dont bother of course you do as you only have a couple that you recycle over and over again but you are answering my challenge to stop merely claiming evolution is false and back it up with evidence so your answer yet again does nut cut it.
geez, where to start, well you could google speciation and read up on that. It clearly points out that speciation has only been witnessed in some aquatic life and viruses and bacteria, as well as some small insects. Humans are NOT part of the list, as is the rest of the planet. So people are making an assumable leap here with no evidence. Just assume assume , assume.
Again stop claiming and start providing evidence
Of course things can be debunked, but merely claiming so doesn't automatically debunk things.
Again a meaningless answer. Were you trying to be funny or just showing more stupidity?
Are you referring to yourself in the thrid person?
You had best avoid the ants. Whoops you have done many times. So if it is plentiful then it is target food. Then by your definition all our food is target food. We may make apple pies because we can but we can and do eat them right off the tree and there are plenty of apples. There is an almost endless list so again your, as you admit trick question has been debunked. You had better offer a better definition.
Its quite simple actually, a target food would be plentiful no matter where we live. Would not have to be processed so it is natural, and we would depend on it to a large degree.. Like ants are to the ant eater is probably a good example.
OMG you can't be that dim witted. Pye is not discovering any facts, hes just revealing whats in all of our DNA. This is why this whole argument of him not revealing his sources is so stupid.
Did you click the link? It links directly to the NIH search database...and yes, it's public. Problem is, if you search for Pye, nothing pops up!! Tons of other respectable authors though
It's a public domain you idiot, why are you guys so dim witted about this, I don't get it.
Ironic you're calling me a clown asking me to search the very database I linked in my post
Are you completely delusional? Everyone including me has told you over and over on every page that you have very poor reading skills and read only what you want to see at best.
No one is pointing out any words I have missed from speed reading.
Your correct in one thing. Until you give a definition of so called 'target food' I have nothing to say about a fools misconception
I was being sarcastic, I actually find it pathetic as well, pathetic that you aren't able to see that you lost this debate and I left you speechless with no target ideas to produce.
No you are avoiding the issue yet again. I posed to you cows target food is not from here. So now prove grass is their target food. It should be easy for you so saying grass may not be from here is just more nonsense.
You have it backwards but yes grass could be a target food for cows, what we don't know is if grass was brought here as well. It's a valid point, for once.
And you accept it without question. Chalk up another thing you take on faith.
Well it is true that the title which matches with over a dozen other sites does indicate he is claiming it to be a fact.
I asked for a link not an excuse. Try again. Provide a link where it gives the evidence for telepathy being a fact.
The findings are published in the NIH database you dim wit.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
OMG you can't be that dim witted. Pye is not discovering any facts, hes just revealing whats in all of our DNA. This is why this whole argument of him not revealing his sources is so stupid.
Did you click the link? It links directly to the NIH search database...and yes, it's public. Problem is, if you search for Pye, nothing pops up!! Tons of other respectable authors though
It's a public domain you idiot, why are you guys so dim witted about this, I don't get it.
Ironic you're calling me a clown asking me to search the very database I linked in my post
Well you are correct again, there is no such thing as target food for humans, and that is the whole point, one that I was worried you weren't getting.
Yet again you delude yourself as I have always told you there is no such thing as target food as everyone else here has also. But seeing as though you now claim this to be a trick question you not only admit you have continuously lied your arguments based on target food now become defunct
That would be because I found Pyes video from a link and other site, searching for aliens tampering with our DNA. So it was in total hindsight.The reason I was searching for this to begin with was a long process of trying to figure out how it was that god laid out his punishments on us. The best way was to put myself in his shoes and ask how I would do it. DNA seemed like the only plausible way, and there were hints of DNA issues in the bible to start with. As an example where the four headed creature of lion ox eagle and man appear in the bible. It was obviously the work of someone that plays with DNA.
You dont look for the ones that prove Pye or the bible. Seems like a one sided and closed minded search but hey you are tooth
Do you copy and paste all your responses? Dont bother of course you do as you only have a couple that you recycle over and over again but you are answering my challenge to stop merely claiming evolution is false and back it up with evidence so your answer yet again does nut cut it.
sure.
Again stop claiming and start providing evidence
You were commenting about "him" while I was referring to you.
Again a meaningless answer. Were you trying to be funny or just showing more stupidity?
Well the mere fact that a food is in abundance is not making it a target food alone. Mlk is in abundance but it really wasn't meant for us to drink right.
You had best avoid the ants. Whoops you have done many times. So if it is plentiful then it is target food. Then by your definition all our food is target food.
Well the apple is a good example, at least of one that you could say is closer to being a target food. However you have to break it down. Is it a necessary food, and no its not.
We may make apple pies because we can but we can and do eat them right off the tree and there are plenty of apples. There is an almost endless list so again your, as you admit trick question has been debunked. You had better offer a better definition.
Well the apple is a good example, at least of one that you could say is closer to being a target food. However you have to break it down. Is it a necessary food, and no its not.
Thats cute but shakes are not target food either as there is process.
What do you mean with "break it down"??? In that mind of yours, is it only target food if it's in shake form?
They are the closest to a target food but still far from it. We surly don't rely on them for a main part of our diet and they can't be found everywhere.
Look, apples provide necessary nutrients, we can eat them, they are natural...ergo they are our natural target food. Compared to let's say...wood...or moss. Fish is target meat too. Everything you eat on a daily basis is food coming from nature...ergo natural.
Pye doesn't discuss target food.
Your entire argument is so illogical I'm still not sure whether you're joking or simply that blinded by Pye's nonsense that you can't accept reality anymore.
Originally posted by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to post by idmonster
Where are you guys getting this idea that I have live in some fantasy world where I am infallible? I reiterated over and over again that our understanding, as a species, is quite fallible. Did you think that I consider myself part of a different species or something? All I ask from the trolls in this thread is that they respond to me in a concise and orderly manner (as I have attempted to do, but gave up after a certain point). I really don't care whether I'm right or not (all part of the learning process). If I'm wrong on a point, I don't just get all pi$sy and reactionary like some people I know. I also don't really get why people who don't like my demeanor bother to respond. It should be pretty obvious by now, that questioning my method of delivery, rather than the content, is absolutely pointless, except to make me mad (takes alot, believe it or not) I just consider it a learning experience. No offense, but some of you ATSers can be unbelievably dense sometimes. Also, yes, I was aware that anger is an emotion. It is one that I am intimately aware of. Way to push the density factor up to 11, sir.edit on 30/3/2012 by xXxinfidelxXx because: (no reason given)