It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Everything I read made it clear that when speciation occurs, the species dies quick. I consider death a failed attempt at this mode working.
What might these magical elements be? If you're talking about conserved motifs, well those are basically the same in everything from bacteria to humans, and it looks to me like they didn't prevent speciation. Remember, that in the end species is an artificial concept created by man, that we apply to a population that shows a characteristic frequency of alleles that is -in the long run- wide open to change.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
What constitutes a large jump? It's looking more and more with each conversation that there is some type of intelligence behind evolution.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Everything I read made it clear that when speciation occurs, the species dies quick. I consider death a failed attempt at this mode working.
Originally posted by rhinoceros
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by Varemia
There are elements in our genes that don't want our species to drift out of what it is, just like there is gametic isolation that prevents other species from breeding with each other.
What do you mean by "allowed?" What limiting force is there within animals that would prevent them from continuously changing forever?
What might these magical elements be? If you're talking about conserved motifs, well those are basically the same in everything from bacteria to humans, and it looks to me like they didn't prevent speciation. Remember, that in the end species is an artificial concept created by man, that we apply to a population that shows a characteristic frequency of alleles that is -in the long run- wide open to change.edit on 24-2-2012 by rhinoceros because: (no reason given)
So there should be bones, lots of bones proving all of this speciation over millions of years. Why is it that they can't find any bones that they can identify as being a speciation of apes of humans?
You're reading wrong. When talking about speciation of sexually reproducing organisms, we're in general talking about a process that happens over 0.1-1k thousands of years. There's no such thing as 'quick' in such cases..
Ya but what I'm saying is whats making that change, and knowing how to make the changes, in addition to executing it, sounds to me like there is intelligence behind it.
There's no intelligence needed. It's simple freaking logic. If the chromosomal genes change too much to blend with another set from someone within your species, then they will not blend. If the change is small, however, then the genes will blend and continue spreading. Multiply this occurrence by a few hundred thousand alterations, and the genes will be significantly different from where they started during an arbitrary observation.
Stop making up imaginary limitations.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by rhinoceros
So there should be bones, lots of bones proving all of this speciation over millions of years. Why is it that they can't find any bones that they can identify as being a speciation of apes of humans?
You're reading wrong. When talking about speciation of sexually reproducing organisms, we're in general talking about a process that happens over 0.1-1k thousands of years. There's no such thing as 'quick' in such cases..
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by Varemia
Ya but what I'm saying is whats making that change, and knowing how to make the changes, in addition to executing it, sounds to me like there is intelligence behind it.
There's no intelligence needed. It's simple freaking logic. If the chromosomal genes change too much to blend with another set from someone within your species, then they will not blend. If the change is small, however, then the genes will blend and continue spreading. Multiply this occurrence by a few hundred thousand alterations, and the genes will be significantly different from where they started during an arbitrary observation.
Stop making up imaginary limitations.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by rhinoceros
So there should be bones, lots of bones proving all of this speciation over millions of years. Why is it that they can't find any bones that they can identify as being a speciation of apes of humans?
You're reading wrong. When talking about speciation of sexually reproducing organisms, we're in general talking about a process that happens over 0.1-1k thousands of years. There's no such thing as 'quick' in such cases..
"Evolution" mixes two things together, one real, one imaginary.
Variation (microevolution) is the real part. The types of bird beaks, the colors of moths, leg sizes, etc. are variation. Each type and length of beak a finch can have is already in the gene pool and adaptive mechanisms of finches.
Creationists have always agreed that there is variation within species.
What evolutionists do not want you to know is that there are strict limits to variation that are never crossed, something every breeder of animals or plants is aware of.
A complex arrangement of live backed with intelligence.
When someone chooses vanilla instead of chocolate, what outside intelligence is influencing them to pick one?
But me point here is that none of these that aren't human, have been linked to humans.
but they can
for humans look e.g. www.theistic-evolution.com... (yes the url is stupid, but skulls depicted in the pic are very much real, A is modern chimp, G is modern human, the rest are skulls from our lineage with oldest being B..)
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by andersensrm
A complex arrangement of live backed with intelligence.
When someone chooses vanilla instead of chocolate, what outside intelligence is influencing them to pick one?
Then let me rephrase my comment.
In summary;
with how rare the process of fossilisation is, I’ll leave it to the undedicated and ignorant to wonder why we don’t have “bones all over the place”, I’ll simply marvel that we have any fossils at all.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by idmonster
Then let me rephrase my comment.
In summary;
with how rare the process of fossilisation is, I’ll leave it to the undedicated and ignorant to wonder why we don’t have “bones all over the place”, I’ll simply marvel that we have any fossils at all.
How is it that in over 150 years, archeologists have managed to find over 2.5 million bones, and not a one of them connects us to any other life?
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by idmonster
Then let me rephrase my comment.
In summary;
with how rare the process of fossilisation is, I’ll leave it to the undedicated and ignorant to wonder why we don’t have “bones all over the place”, I’ll simply marvel that we have any fossils at all.
How is it that in over 150 years, archeologists have managed to find over 2.5 million bones, and not a one of them connects us to any other life?
What world do you live in? Bones get eaten by many animals and spread around as well.
Well bones don't typically get eaten.
Why have you started talking like a pirate? They have all been linked to humans, obviously
But me point here is that none of these that aren't human, have been linked to humans.
They have but like ants, wolves, sparrows, balanced eco systems you have chosen to ignore the evidence to hold onto your childish nonsense that has none
Then let me rephrase my comment.
How is it that in over 150 years, archeologists have managed to find over 2.5 million bones, and not a one of them connects us to any other life?