It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by andersensrm
what is the US vs?
Yea but that information doesn't get passed throughout civilizations because of the Us vs. Them mentality, as well as the fact that they aren't connected to each other like we are now.
Ok well we don't eat any of the same food. We don't both live underground. We don't have any matching relationships with any of the other life here on earth. We don't attend the same colleges, we both don't drink milk, we both don't have the same nesting habits, we both don't have a queen that we tend to. Does that kinda sort it out for you.
Colin I allready answered this, I told you we DONT have anything in common with ants, you missed my point alltogether.
No you actually have not answered it at all. I have shown you whether you took the time to look or not that we do have things in common with ants. You saying no we dont is not an answer. Try again.
You have not provided any links that show us to cohabitate with ants.
Proof if any more was needed that you do not read the links provided.
I seriously want to know what your on.
Another failure by you as that also does not say 'we depend on milk'.
If you knew how to read and weren't so incredulous, I would agree. Milk is an important part of our diet, summs it up for me.
I dont care what another site says. You called me a liar when I told you you were wrong in what you stated the original site info was. Your avoidance of that issue means I was right and you were again wrong.
Your never going to get apoligies when your so incredulous, but even more importantly not until one is due. You have to listen and enguage in a conversation long before any of that is going to happen.
Very small of you. You have again lived down to my expectations. Well done
Well there is nothing new about understanding that there were in fact other races here on earth.
Oldest concept in the book, the act of making some other groups of humans different somehow, and there for we are against them. Might have first started with neanderthals, but then progressed as humans became more complex with religions, then it was if you aren't in our religion your a them, and your not us, so therefore we are against you.
Think about it, how many times would evolution have had to occur "naturally" in the same exact order each time, to produce just one breeding pair of complex life? Now how many times would this have had to happen for us to see the abundance and diversity of life all around us? And to think, some people find it difficult to believe in God.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by Quadrivium
All mammels drop eggs, its just that chicken eggs, when cooked, we eat.
Originally posted by andersensrm
reply to post by Quadrivium
Heres the problem I have with, theres no way evolution could happen because the % chance that it would happen is too small. Now lets say we're an outsider somehow looking in to a universe being created. By some miracle of events, random events lead to a universe much like our own. All the intelligent beings would come to the same conclusion that there is no way their universe came about the way it did, becasue the % chance is to small. But theres still a chance, and the reason we're talking about it, is because we fell into that tiny % that came into existence.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Let me correct that last comment, Birds which is what chickens are, Not mammels, drop eggs just like mammels do.
Does that make more sense?
Youll never convince me they do it specifically for human consumption. To answer your question, I don't have a frikken clue.
Ok tooth,
I actually raise chickens, dairy goats, and I am an active bee keeper.
Bees make excess honey, the only thing that limits a strong hive is the amount of space they have and nectar flow.
Well that was the whole thing I was trying to say, but screwed it up. In a sense they drop eggs all year round, just like most mammels that have a cycle. Only difference is the egg is large, and edible. But I don't think they were specifically for human consumption.
Prehaps you can explain why chickens lay eggs year round even if there are no roosters in the yard. No chance of fertilization yet they still lay.
There is no doubt that usage or manipulation can alter the production, even in humans.
Or why dairy goats and cows continue to lactate as long as their being milked.
Quad
I watched my youngest come out, and thought I would get sick and faint but I was ok. It was weird to say the least.
On a side note and completly off topic:
My three boys actually got to watch three kids being born yesterday.
The miracle of life is AWSOME.
Youll never convince me
Oh Quad, there are a lot of things we can steal and benefit from. The bottom line is that it wasn't meant for us to begin with.
And it's just coincidence that man benifits from all this excess?
This form of manipulation confuses people, and for some reason makes them believe that the animals are helping us because they want to. I assure you, it's only manipulation. We are forcing the world around us to fit our needs.
I do not harm my animals, we have a working relationship. I provide them with food, shelter and safety. They provide nourishment for my family and I.
No I think earth is not our home because the bible says so, lack of any target food, Sitchen, Pye, Dietary issues, health issues, redundant adaptation, forced processing of water and food, and a plethora of other things all tell us its so.
You think we do not belong on earth because we do not have a direct food source.
It can become confusing as there were things brought to earth to feed us, as in the bible. But it also states that non of them are from our home. So once again, they actually weren't specifically made for our consumption. We are scavengars, its a fact that requires very little thought to realize. We can eat almost anything, and basically do.
Try looking at the bigger picture. Our food is given to us. We do not "steal" it, we may have to work for it, but then so do all animals in one way or another.
I do so because I'm a skeptic, and want anyone to produce a single shred of evidence that I'm wrong. There is nothing happy about what I believe happened to us, so I'm not believing for self gradification.
If your mind is already made up and you do not want to learn anything new, then why do you continue coming back to this thread?
I'm a firm believer in opening the mind, but I also agree that its probably best to not open it so much that your brain could fall out.
When you start a post with:
Youll never convince me
It kinda puts a wall up and closes you off from the discussion.
Try opening that mind of yours, you might be surprised at what will happen.
Quad
Up until now I would just take this as another attempt at not answering the points I made. But now I see you really believe HUMANS LAY EGGS and it was not a typo. What a total plank, no wonder everything you are shown goes over your head. When did you hatch BTW? Must have come out of an egg with a pretty thick shell and used your head to break out which explains the obvious damage.
Ok well we don't eat any of the same food. We don't both live underground. We don't have any matching relationships with any of the other life here on earth. We don't attend the same colleges, we both don't drink milk, we both don't have the same nesting habits, we both don't have a queen that we tend to. Does that kinda sort it out for you.
Call for your nurse. Urgently
You have not provided any links that show us to cohabitate with ants.
Another drug reference. You are flirting with the mods now as well for a second time
I seriously want to know what your on.
Coming from you, a science major and discoverer of an arcane virus, your opinion means nothing at all
If you knew how to read and weren't so incredulous, I would agree. Milk is an important part of our diet, summs it up for me.
did not really expect you to be big enough to admit error as you have proved yourself to be a very small person in every aspect of your character. I suggest you go lay a clutch of eggs and hatch out a few friends to talk too
Your never going to get apoligies when your so incredulous, but even more importantly not until one is due. You have to listen and enguage in a conversation long before any of that is going to happen.
Isnt LUCA a theoretical organism?
This is where evolution gets fuzzy to me.
LUCA had to come from somewhere and there had to be a lot of them if evolution is true. So as I said, think of how many times it would of had to occur in order to get the right combination for breeding.
I may have misunderstood your original point and went back to far but simple life to complex life is no different than what I described in my last post
Think about it, how many times would evolution have had to occur "naturally" in the same exact order each time, to produce just one breeding pair of complex life?
Despite this. there only needed to be one that had the ability to multiply. I am sure you know that so this cannot be what you are asking/fuzzy about.
You have made the 200 + pages worth the pain because I have also learned a few things from our chat that I never realised before but probably should have.
Colin,
I now think I am beginning to understand. But it is hard to wrap my head around.
You have to understand that for years I have been told that evolution proves there is no God. Many atheist even seem to take enjoyment in TRYING to prove Creation wrong using evolution.
Why do you think so many do this if evolution actually has nothing to say about the beginning?
Also,
Hopefully we have plenty of time to learn from each other but.
Maybe I gave you the wrong impression but I in no way, shape or form accept that all diversity of life came from just one that had the ability to multiply. That leads us back to mammals turning into fish again.
Originally posted by metalholic
Blonde hair is key! A little ff ever saw a monkey with white skin? How about blue eyes?
Originally posted by Quadrivium
reply to post by Barcs
Lol ok barcs. You used "order" in your response, I used "group" in my definition to mean the same as "order".
My way:
There are many differnt species in the "group" know as flys.
Your way:
There are many differnt species in the "order" know as Diptera.
I will admit that most times I post from memory without using links as I use my phone to post here on ATS and it has limited capabilities. Even so, I do not see my definition as being philosophical.
I did not get the definition from the site in your above post. That definition is my own, put in my own words from many things I have read in the past and I have read alot so I can not possibly find a link.
I also apologize if the link I provided was "philosophical".
Many, many times I try to avoid those sites while posting because some people dismiss them out of hand. I find it much better to use strictly scientific sites, that way there is less argument.
If memory serves me right (as I said, limited capabilities on my phone), I posted the link in question to our discussion on fossils. Once again I apologize for not vetting it further than I did .
Quad