It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by colin42
reply to post by Connector
I'm not sure If I have not blown my mind and completely lost the plot. I am now wondering if because ants have a queen just like the English, if the English are not from here. I mean we only appeared after the last ice age and the queen likes gold
Originally posted by colin42
reply to post by Connector
Well I have only one piece of the puzzle left to answer. I have read that there are several races of aliens. one is the INSECTOIDS.
Does anyone know if their size has ever been given? Have our ant masters been watching us from the garden all these years? Should we replace our dogs with anteaters the new saviours of humanity
Those were one in the same, I only went to one about DNA.
No, you claimed that was a totally different seminar and had nothing to do with a "blue laminate". You claimed that the man holding the seminar said that DNA was in the shape of a cross or that the shape of the cross was present in DNA.
Now you want me to believe that we started drinking milk by accident. I don't know man, I think there was more to it than that.
I already explained this. Our decision to drink milk didn't extend past, "Hey, babies drink milk. Those cows we've domesticated produce milk. Let's drink it." The first people to drink cow's milk had no concept of nutritional science. They were simply looking for food and drink to stay alive. It just so happens that milk is a great source of calcium. However, as I have pointed out numerous times now many items we would have foraged during our hunter-gatherer days would have also contained calcium. In fact we're finding now that these things are better at increasing bone density than cow's milk despite having less calcium. That's why calcium intake needs to increase as you're getting older. Your bones are becoming more frail. However, as I have also pointed out already, when humans first started drinking cow's milk they weren't living to the point where bone density began to decrease. That didn't occur until the past century or two.
No what was done to us, as mentioned in the bible, wouldn't work like that. If your 30, then you could say you look how you would look if you were 300. Our rapid ageing process is very unfair. Of course most people say heck I wouldn't want to live that long. Providing the gross defects we have in our genes, I agree. But those aren't suppose to be there either.
AH, but Xcalibur, you forget -- itsthetooth is a Biblical literalist. He believes that people used to live to be 1000 years old, so they would have been well past the prime age for decreasing bone density.
Your on the wrong channel for apologies. The only thing I have gotten from this thread is people pushing horrible links on me that always warn me first off to be either a hypothetical or postulated theory.
Evolution was an accepted fact LOOOOOOOOOOONg before Darwin. I even posted a slightly off topic "short history of evolution" a few pages back. Darwin didnt discover evolution. Darwin recognised the mechanism for evolution which he called "natural selection", he even published a book called "origin of the species" or "Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life", you may have heard of it, it had pictures in it.(these were drawn by Darwin in black and white, so you could colour them in.)
Natural selection as Darwin understood it has been revised many times but still hold more or less accurate. The current model of the mechanism for evolution is call "neo-darwinian synthesis".
In summary, your statement above is false, I will accept a tacit apology.
tacit - adjective
1.
understood without being openly expressed; implied: tacit approval.
You want me to believe that birds latate? Do they even have nipples, I don't think so. I'm thinking of Meet the Faukers. You have to be kidding me. As far as cats stealing, it doesn't shock me. Do they depend on it like we do?
We're not. Adult cows and sheep continue to drink milk into adulthood, its called "cross suckling". This is when an adult identifies a lactating mother and drinks the milk to the detriment of the calf/lamb.
But they're the same species, so how about cats stealing milk from the teat of nursing elephant seals. (as well as a plethora of birds)
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by idmonster
You want me to believe that birds latate? Do they even have nipples, I don't think so. I'm thinking of Meet the Faukers. You have to be kidding me. As far as cats stealing, it doesn't shock me. Do they depend on it like we do?
We're not. Adult cows and sheep continue to drink milk into adulthood, its called "cross suckling". This is when an adult identifies a lactating mother and drinks the milk to the detriment of the calf/lamb.
But they're the same species, so how about cats stealing milk from the teat of nursing elephant seals. (as well as a plethora of birds)
It’s moderately well known that several families of birds (pigeons and doves, flamingos, and penguins) secrete a kind of milk (called “crop milk”, though penguins don’t have crops) for their young. This is real milk, secreted by a special gland – not regurgitated, half-digested food from the parent’s stomach. (Regurgitators put their bills into the chick’s mouth to deliver food, whereas in milk-providing species the chicks put their bills inside the parent’s mouth to nurse. ) The three families evolved this capacity independently, for three different reasons. With penguins it seems to be an emergency food substitute in case the feeding parent (usually the female) doesn’t return to the nesting parent in time. With flamingos it’s apparently because the chicks aren’t able to handle normal food, and perhaps because the flamingo’s bill makes the regurgitation method awkward. In the case of pigeons, it allows them to raise several small broods per season (only one or two eggs each), since their well-fed squabs grow extraordinarily quickly. (This is probably also why squabs are so fat, juicy and tasty.)edit on 5-2-2012 by Connector because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by Connector
If they have to go down there throat to get it, its not going to be stolen then.
You guys are using one extreme of an example that has nothing to do with where I stand on this.
They don't depend on it, if they are able to steal any at all.
Your comparing this to what we do which has evolved ( no pun intended ) into a friken industry. There is no comparison.edit on 5-2-2012 by itsthetooth because: (no reason given)
itsthetooth
You want me to believe that birds latate? Do they even have nipples, I don't think so.
Originally posted by OhZone
There is No Proof! There will never be proof.
Some scientists are now thinking that maybe the apes evolved from humans.
anthropology.net...
A Human Ancestor for the Apes?
Nature cares not about intelligence.
Its primary objective is Survival!
And so all life develps to live in its environment.
Apes/monkeys are much better adapted to this world than we humans.
For one, They developed a very useful Thumb on their feet.
Human arrogance does not make them the highest life form on this planet.
Its a good reply it just doesn't compare to what we are doing in growing, harvesting, processing, shipping, and storing with cows milk.
I addressed your assertion that birds don't lactate and provided a link that not only birds lactate, but so do fish, and reptiles I.E. Create a secretion ( milk mucous) that their offspring utilize for sustenance. You said birds don't lactate illustrated by your quote above.
Also, what's response on ant's not from here as they also farm milk(mucous)?
Don't be so obtuse to save face......be honest.
Unless less you can answer this post with verifiable facts, don't bother answering
It is also not uniquely human. Ants farm and 'milk' aphids even though they do not need too to survive. It may not be milk but it is a secretion from another animal. Ants even take aphid eggs to their nest during the winter and place them back on selected plants later. Thus farming in every sense of the word.
They also farm certain fungus as we grow certain plants. This leads me to believe that ants do not know their target food as they also are not from this planet. Of course this means the anteater who knows he belongs because he eats ants is completely wrong and in fact as he is so reliant on ants he must also not be from here.
I have asked tooth to explain this anomaly with his theory and he refuses. I dont know why?
Edit
After further thought. Ants like humans build their own homes (nests) very unnatural if you ask me. The nests even have certain rooms for certain activities just like humans. Oh and a queen just like the English.
Ants are either definitely not from earth or humans definitely are from earth and the anteater is the key ironically because tooth says the anteater knows he is from here because he eats ants. The anteater therefore proves humans are from this planet. Who would have guessed.
I see above you do indeed intend not to discuss my post.
Its a good reply it just doesn't compare to what we are doing in growing, harvesting, processing, shipping, and storing with cows milk.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by Connector
Its a good reply it just doesn't compare to what we are doing in growing, harvesting, processing, shipping, and storing with cows milk.
I addressed your assertion that birds don't lactate and provided a link that not only birds lactate, but so do fish, and reptiles I.E. Create a secretion ( milk mucous) that their offspring utilize for sustenance. You said birds don't lactate illustrated by your quote above.
Also, what's response on ant's not from here as they also farm milk(mucous)?
Don't be so obtuse to save face......be honest.
Unless less you can answer this post with verifiable facts, don't bother answering
If evolutionism was real, we would be cramming it down every kids throat in school.
There is a very good reason why you never say or refer to the missing link but choose to use the term common ancestor.