It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What are you talking about, wow, calling me delusional. No one has ever explained flagellum. It's not explainable by evolutionists.
I see you are still deep in your delusion that you have somehow scared everyone away. You had flagellum explained to you pages back and several ways including links and you decided to remain ignorant as usual.
The only ignorance again is no one being able to explain flagellum.
No one has run away, everyone has turned away which is very different because to be honest you are a complete waste of bandwidth.
This latest post is an attempt to get people posting to you again. You must be feeling lonely. In part it has worked but with me only this one time.
You have shown you wish to wallow in ignorance but I am afraid you'll have to do it alone.
The only ignorance again is no one being able to explain flagellum.
Sure because you think motors can evolve. Please people give it up.
Not sure why you bring up the flagellum. But if you're implying that scientists can't explain something in regards to it, and that's somehow proof of some bat# crazy alien intervention or ID hypothesis, then you're yet again presenting a prime example of an argument from ignorance
By the way, Google is your friend: LINK
I know you don't really care about facts or real research...but still...at least make a bit of an effort
Originally posted by itsthetooth
Sure because you think motors can evolve. Please people give it up.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
Sure because you think motors can evolve. Please people give it up.
Not sure why you bring up the flagellum. But if you're implying that scientists can't explain something in regards to it, and that's somehow proof of some bat# crazy alien intervention or ID hypothesis, then you're yet again presenting a prime example of an argument from ignorance
By the way, Google is your friend: LINK
I know you don't really care about facts or real research...but still...at least make a bit of an effort
At least one of us admits when we have been wrong.
And you trot out the "profiling" deflection once again. You get things wrong, I point it out, and I'm the bad guy. Try having some self-awareness and sense of accountability. Face it, you have a track record of misinterpreting artistic representations as being literal. It's no wonder you think the Bible is a scientific reference book. You saw a computer animation of DNA that happened to have the color blue assigned to the backbone of the polymer and then spent over 100 pages of another thread arguing that DNA had a "blue laminate". Later, you admitted that you must have been wrong about this. Now you've taken an artist's rendition of the structure of a flagellum and are claiming that it must have been designed based on a pretty picture. Not on a microscopic image, not a molecular analysis of the parts that go into it, but based on a pretty picture that someone else drew. Wonder how many pages of arguing it'll take you to figure out that you're wrong about this as well
Well I'll admit that I don't probably have the time into research that you guys do, but I find myself stopping on the links when they openly address the material as postulated theorys.
All you have to do is actually do some proper research for once. But once again, you simply ignore the link proving you wrong and continue to spread your hogwash.
Well I'll admit that I don't probably have the time into research that you guys do,
but I find myself stopping on the links when they openly address the material as postulated theorys.
Speaking of not doing research, right here on ATS right now is a forum about people getting sick from raw milk.
Just look at how well we have evolved. NOT!
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
Well I'll admit that I don't probably have the time into research that you guys do, but I find myself stopping on the links when they openly address the material as postulated theorys.
All you have to do is actually do some proper research for once. But once again, you simply ignore the link proving you wrong and continue to spread your hogwash.
Speaking of not doing research, right here on ATS right now is a forum about people getting sick from raw milk.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Just look at how well we have evolved. NOT!edit on 4-2-2012 by itsthetooth because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by MrXYZ
There is no evidence that man evolved from monkeys/apes. Both man and monkeys/apes could have evolved from the same creature and any missing link could be used to prove either theory. There are so many variables that can't be definitely proven that it seems researching exactly what happened or arguing over it is just a waste of time. I don't know why man likes to debate things like that, must be some sort of ancient conditioning to steer us away from seeing important things.
And its evident that you once again totally missed the point. We aren't suppose to be drinking it to begin with.
Speaking of not doing research, it's obvious that you haven't looked into this enough to understand why people are getting sick from the milk ...
And you missed yet another point... It's obvious that we aren't evolving. Had we of evolved, we first of all wouldn't be getting sick from the milk and second we wouldn't have had to be drinking it in the first place.
... because if you did, you'd understand that it has nothing to do with evolution. This statement clearly shows that you still don't understand the basics of evolution. I doubt you ever will.
Just becuase I choose not to buy into postulated, hypothetical theorys, doesn't mean I'm failing.
Are you talking about iterationzero here? I have called you out numerous times on being blatantly wrong and you always come up for some excuse for why you will not admit that you are wrong. I have provided you with links that provide you with proof that you are wrong and you always come back with "Well..." followed by the most unscientific drivel I have ever heard just so you don't have to admit you're wrong. As iterationzero said learn to take accountability for your failings.
Well its complicated, but first of all I was told that evolutionists believe that our ability to adapt is a form of evolution. In other words we adapted in our needs of calcium by drinking cows milk.
How exactly are milk allergies debunking evolution? It makes perfect sense to be honest. Humans haven't used cattle for milk production for that long. So since homo sapiens evolved, most of the milk we drank was human milk as babies...and then none. Only since farming started did the larger population start to drink milk...so some of them are allergic.
Animals have allergies too. And illnesses. It's normal, it's how biology works.
Had we of evolved correctly, which according to wiki is on the molecular level, we would have adjusted with our needs in calcium and would have no longer had the demand.
And its evident that you once again totally missed the point. We aren't suppose to be drinking it to begin with.
And you missed yet another point... It's obvious that we aren't evolving. Had we of evolved, we first of all wouldn't be getting sick from the milk and second we wouldn't have had to be drinking it in the first place.
Your so far behind understanding whats going on with all this that your actually tripping over the problems.